Microsoft U-turn as WMF patch released early

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Microsoft released a fix for a serious security vulnerability in Windows on Thursday, several days before the patch's scheduled delivery.

The company is breaking with its monthly patch cycle because it completed testing of the security update earlier than it anticipated, it said in a note on its Web site. "In addition, Microsoft is releasing the update early in response to strong customer sentiment that the release should be made available as soon as possible," the company said.

Security bulletin MS06-001, originally scheduled for Tuesday, is the first security bulletin of this year and fixes a vulnerability in the way Windows renders Windows Meta File images. The bug was discovered last week and is increasingly being used in what Microsoft calls "malicious and criminal attacks on computer users."

Critics had called for Microsoft to release the patch as soon as possible. With people unable to patch their systems, the flaw could provide an opportunity for cybercriminals to launch increasingly sophisticated attacks on users, they have said.

Some security experts, in an unusual move, even recommended that users apply a third-party patch developed by European programmer Ilfak Guilfanov.

No fix for Windows 98, ME
Also on Thursday, Microsoft said that older versions of Windows are immune to the latest wave of attacks targeting the operating system.

While Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 are vulnerable, Windows 98 and Windows Millennium Edition are not exposed to the same threats that exploit the WMF flaw, according to an update to a Microsoft security advisory on the issue.

Microsoft initially also listed the older versions of the operating system as equally vulnerable, but has now backpedalled on that, giving users of older Windows versions a reprieve.

"Although Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows Millennium Edition do contain the affected component, at this point in the investigation, an exploitable attack vector has not been identified that would yield a critical severity rating for these versions," the company said in its updated advisory.

In more bad news for vulnerable PCs, Microsoft warned of another way for attackers to use the flaw--via a malicious image embedded in a Microsoft Office document. The company previously said that an attack could only occur if a user visited a Web site containing a malicious image or opened such a file attached to an e-mail.

Microsoft does not say whether the older Windows versions could be susceptible to less-serious attacks. Because the issue is not deemed critical for Windows 98 and ME, Microsoft no longer plans to issue a security fix for these OSes. "Per the support life cycle of these versions, only vulnerabilities of critical severity would receive security updates," the company said.

Talkback

M$ should be charged with criminal negligence for not issuing patches for ALL of their OS's ..I love how this flaw in their code affects all M$ platforms but when taking care of their customers..yes Mr Gates I paid for a version of your OS and now even though you claim to have extended support for me and my fellow users you abandon us (why would I even consider buying another of your crappy swiss cheese like Operating systems in the future if this is the way you treat your users?? Apple will be getting my cash from here on out).

You can't whitewash the fact that this is a CRITICAL VUNERABILITY for ALL M$ Products .. to quote your site: "Microsoft Windows 98, Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition (SE), and Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition (ME) were previously listed as affected, but are no longer listed. Why is that?
Although Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, and Windows Millennium Edition do contain the affected component, at this point in the investigation, an exploitable attack vector has not been identified that would yield a Critical severity rating for these versions. Per the support life cycle of these versions, only vulnerabilities of Critical severity would receive security updates."

via Facebook 5 January, 2006 22:11
Reply

Spent an evening installing Ubuntu Linux on my laptop a few nights back; best thing I've ever done with it. Why? For free I'm better protected from viruses and malware better than Microsoft's paid customers are.

http://www.ubuntu.com/

The only reason MS released the patch early was because someone fixed the flaw and released an unofficial patch faster than they did, and they wanted to save some face... too bad they dont realize just how many people are still using Win2K that theyre holding back on, or their other OSes that have no need to upgrade.

So you say thats because Linux is in the minority, right? Not such a big or valuable target... not that because Linux is inherently more secure.

Fact of the matter is, I dont care why anymore, I want a machine I can connect to the Internet and actually use without it imploding.

Microsoft should be called to task on this half-hearted attempt to wipe the egg from their collective face.

-- Joshua

via Facebook 5 January, 2006 22:44
Reply

Of course MS can release early, Guilfanov already did all the work!

via Facebook 6 January, 2006 12:30
Reply

Bill and MS abandoned me and my "oldies" Windows 2000 and Windows 98 still running on my HP Pavilion 366 MHz and Compaq 500 MHz Deskpro SFF PC.
I don't even bother complaining about discontinued support for the two.
I'm more than happy with my Xandros 2.0 Business Edition Linux which will celebrate it's second year of running on my ageing machines

sincerely from
Linux XandBE 2.4.24-x1 #1 SMP Fri Feb 20 16:30:52 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux

via Facebook 9 January, 2006 06:30
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

7 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

8 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

12 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

13 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

13 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

14 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

16 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

22 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

24 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

24 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?