Firewalls: Your first line of defence

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

COMMENT

As a systems administrator for an ISP , my primary function is to support several thousand customers by ensuring that equipment and services are operating correctly. Depending on the customer, this job can include maintaining on-site routing and firewall equipment, which can vary depending on the specific needs of the customer.

When it comes to supplying Internet access, ISPs provision a single IP address or a subnet for their customers. Either way, I always suggest that anyone accessing the Internet protect systems with either a hardware or software firewall.

Of course, IT pros know that a firewall is anything that protects a computer or network from the ravages of the Internet. But when talking to end users, I try to describe the level of questionable activity on the Internet in terms of worldwide accessibility.

Because public Internet addresses are readily accessible from anywhere in the world, even a simple dial-up Internet connection with a public IP address exposes your computer to the rest of the world while you're connected. This means anyone on the Internet can identify your computer—and perhaps scan it to see whether it's running vulnerable software or services. That's why you need to implement a firewall to try to protect it.

Hardware vs. software firewalls
As I tell my customers, deciding which type of firewall to use depends on what you're trying to protect. If you're just worried about a single computer system with Internet access, ZoneAlarm software works well enough for most people.

ZoneAlarm not only alerts you when someone tries to access your computer, but it alerts you when a program on your computer attempts unauthorised access to the Internet. If the access is valid, you can instruct ZoneAlarm to remember the program and allow access in the future without alerts. Although it's not an antivirus program, ZoneAlarm can also detect Trojan horse and spyware programs.

However, sometimes a software firewall just won't cut it. I suggest using a hardware firewall in these situations:

  • A customer needs Internet access on more than one computer.
  • A customer needs a secure connection to a main office.
  • The client is a branch office.
  • A company needs to host email and Web servers.

Even though it's possible to share an Internet connection and firewall software using one computer as the router, I think it's a bad idea to use a workstation in this manner. Everyone on the network becomes dependent on the reliability of someone else's computer.

If a computer locks up or reboots, it cuts off Internet access. Then people call the ISP to complain, even when it's not the source of the problem.

Hardware firewalls don't have to be expensive. For instance, Netgear and Linksys models sport sufficient features for a reasonable cost.

Do you need advanced firewall features?
If clients telecommute or are setting up a branch office of a larger corporation, they probably need to use VPN features. Clients may also need NAT when there are multiple internal computers and only one public IP address.

If customers need a subnet to support public Internet servers, I recommend using port forwarding and "hiding" the real service behind the firewall. No matter which advanced features your clients need, they should choose a hardware firewall that supports these advanced features.

Another thing to keep in mind when dealing with telecommuters or branch offices is to always check with the company's IT department before buying anything. I can't tell you how many times I've needed to replace equipment and fix VPN settings because branch offices and telecommuters didn't check with their IT department before buying equipment.

Regardless of your clients' specific needs, using a firewall does improve security. Anything they can do to "hide" their computer systems and services from the public Internet reduces risk.

My personal preference is to always use hardware firewalls, but software programs such as ZoneAlarm are better than nothing at all. However, firewalls can't prevent a virus or worm from taking over your computer—that's typically the job of antivirus software.

That's why it's important to remember that effective Internet security involves several layers. Consider a firewall system to be the first layer of your clients' security needs.

Talkback

I have to disagree, the first line of defence is NOT a firewall. First, you ditch, that fragment of excrement, known as windows and deploy Linux. Then, you can deploy a firewall for peace of mind. It would appear that securing windows is an impossibility.

via Facebook 1 March, 2006 13:44
Reply

Lets have a balanced discussion, not a Fanboy scrap!

via Facebook 10 March, 2006 13:17
Reply

Unfortunately for the Windows "fanboys", the first poster is correct. Windows is inherently less secure than Linux/Unix/MacOS. This is because the default user generally runs as the administrator, indeed, many Windows programs require the user to be logged in as an administrator. Nearly all of the *nixes (I'm not counting Lindows/Linspire here) have the user running as a user, with further password access required for administrator access.

Count the number of viruses out there for Microsoft programs, then count the number of viruses for *nix and Mac OS. If it was purely related to the popularity of the OS, then I would expect there to be 1 linux virus for every 10-20 Windows viruses, but there aren't.

Draw your own conclusions...

via Facebook 14 March, 2006 09:19
Reply

everyone mentions zonealarm however if it goes wrong support for it is useless, i use omniquad free firewall from download.com, yeas microsoft is seriously flawed but whoever thinks using linux is safer is an idiot..linux has many flaws too its just u dont get attacked as much yet but in reallity any hacker can access a pc using linux, also make sure windows xp firewalls on also.

via Facebook 13 April, 2006 16:54
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

21 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

3 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

5 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

7 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

12 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

14 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

15 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

16 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

17 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

17 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

19 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

19 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

19 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

20 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions