A former Intel contractor has seen his conviction for hacking into the company's systems expunged, after a battle lasting more than a decade.
Randall Schwartz had his arrest and conviction for bypassing Intel security systems "set aside" at the beginning of February, legally giving him a clean slate.
Schwartz was arrested in 1993 after using a program called "Crack" to find out the passwords of various former colleagues in the Intel Supercomputer Systems Division (SSD). Schwartz had left SSD under a cloud, and told the court he decided to crack the Intel passwords to show that SSD's security had gone downhill since he had left, and to reestablish respect he said he had lost when he left SSD.
In late 1995 Schwartz was convicted of three counts of computer crime, and ordered to pay Intel $68,000 (£35,000) restitution. His sentence also included five years of probation, 480 hours of community service, and 90 days of deferred (cancellable) jail time. His legal bill exceeded $170,000 by the end of 1995.
Schwartz has argued that his conviction was unfair, as he had not intended to cause any malicious damage. After an appeal, the restitution was dropped in 1999.
In October 2006 Schwartz appealed for clemency from a Democrat Governor who "had already granted a few pardons", Schwartz explained on the Yahoo Tech Groups site. At the beginning of February 2007 an Oregon court ordered an expungement of his conviction.
Schwartz said that it will take a while for the result to "sink in".
"Even a few weeks later, I'm still in a bit of shock that I've reached this point in this over-13-year journey," Schwartz said. "It probably won't fully sink in until the first time I travel freely into Canada, or fill out an contractor form that asks the question about criminal history, or apply for a Small Business Administration programme that was formerly unavailable to me."
Talkback
$5K of $67K was appealed, but the appeals court referred it back, and the trial court continued the same opinion, so there was no change. Please read the legal documents that you link a little more closely next time.
-- Randal Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com
Expungement is a local matter, from the local district attorney's office to a local judge. It doesn't involve anything like a pardon from the governor's office, and does not speak to the merit of the prosecution, merely that enough time has passed.