McAfee: Businesses 'leery' of Vista

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Vista uptake is unlikely to increase dramatically during 2008, according to security vendor McAfee, who said that businesses are "leery" of upgrading from current Microsoft operating systems.

One reason businesses have not been keen to upgrade to Vista is the hardware that is needed to handle the resource-hungry operating system, David Marcus, security research manager for McAfee Avert Labs, told ZDNet.co.uk on Friday.

"In 2007 there has been less than 10 percent market penetration for Vista," said Marcus. "There hasn't been a huge adoption. Most people haven't upgraded because of the hardware upgrade needed."

There is not enough of a security case for upgrading to Vista, Marcus added. While the 64-bit version of Vista has more security features than Windows XP, XP running Service Pack 2 with security products was adequate for most businesses needs, he said.

"XP is still robust, and is sound with SP2. Most businesses are looking at it from the point of view of, 'Why change out for some nice graphics when XP does what we need?'," Marcus said. "People are leery of upgrading."

There was, however, a security bonus, Marcus said. Vista would be unlikely to become an interesting target for malware writers until it achieved 20 to 30 percent market share — a figure that is still some way off.

"Once Vista gets the numbers it'll become interesting to the bad guys, who'll find ways to circumvent it like anything," said Marcus.

Vista 64-bit security features, such as Kernel Patch Protection, which blocks attempts to modify the core operating system, would not be effective against certain types of malware, Marcus warned.

"If you look at Trojans and bots, the majority just sit on the machine and do what they do — they don't have to root the operating system," said Marcus. Social engineering attacks that attempt to dupe the user will also continue to be a problem on Vista, he warned.

Vista Upgrade Blog

Vista Upgrade Blog
Grappling with the OS

How is the switch to Vista affecting your workplace? Take a look at our new group blog and share your pain and praise.

Read more +

Forrester research suggests that most businesses are keen to stay with XP until at least 2010. In a report, How Windows Vista will shake up the state of the enterprise operating system, Forrester analyst Benjamin Gray wrote that while Vista uptake is currently at two percent, XP is at 84 percent.

"There it is. Two percent! The era of Windows Vista within enterprises has officially started, with a whimper," wrote Gray. "Standardisation on the Windows XP platform has continued unabated, going from 67 percent of PCs last year to 84 percent of PCs this year. And this happened across the board."

Gray said that the majority of businesses will move to Vista only when forced to, by Microsoft ceasing to support XP. The current road map for XP Professional states that extended support will end in April 2014.

"For [mainstream adopters], the justification [to move to Vista] is simply that they want to stay current with Microsoft's support lifecycle," wrote Gray. "Many will move to Windows Vista simply because they don't want to go down the path of supporting a system that doesn't receive security patches on a regular basis."

Just over half of enterprises have no current plans to deploy Windows Vista, according to the research.

Microsoft had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.

Talkback

I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that security support for XP will end shortly. Here's the official policy, from http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy.

"Microsoft will also provide Extended Support for the 5 years following Mainstream support or for 2 years after the second successor product (N+2) is released, whichever is longer."

Extended support follows mainstream support and does not include hotfixes and service packs, but it does include security updates, paid support incidents and, if you sign an extended hotfix agreement, which a lot of large customers do, pretty well any kind of support you'd like, including hotfixes.

According to the MS lifecycle, XP will be in mainstream support until April 2009 (probably within a year of the release of Vista's successor), and in Extended Support, WITH security updates, until April 2014. That's assuming that the replacement for Vista (the N+2 version of Windows) is released before 2012. If they take longer, XP support will last longer.

See http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?LN=en-us&x=10&y=14&p1=3223 for the dates.

Al cook

Al S Cook 19 November, 2007 19:32
Reply

Thank you for taking the time to post a talkback, Al. Your comments on the Microsoft Support Lifecycle are helpful, and go into good depth.

However, you seem to be under the impression that we didn't include that Microsoft plans to support XP until 2014.

From the article:

"The current road map for XP Professional states that extended support will end in April 2014."

Best wishes,

Tom

Tom Espiner 20 November, 2007 12:27
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

33 minutes ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

42 minutes ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

1 hour ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I've also seen that Mac OS X for Intel machines is supposed to run in VirtualBox, which would also be a nice solution. I've never tried it though.

3 hours ago by apexwm on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
dave heasman

What I wonder is why when companies are caught bang to rights in not providing contracted services, people bend over to smear the customers? Surely...

4 hours ago by dave heasman on Virgin throttles broadband for high-speed customers
pjc158

Strange statement from HP regarding Mike Lynch and not capable of scaling a company. Autonomy was a $7bn purchase which started as a small company...

4 hours ago by pjc158 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
lojolondon

Or - possibly, they will destroy business by ensuring people do not invest where there is no return. Another socialist idea, well beyond it's...

7 hours ago by lojolondon on Open Data Institute will act as biz incubator
J.A. Watson

Good stuff Jake, very interesting. Thanks. jw

8 hours ago by J.A. Watson on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
openhgs

"the cost of a second LCD screen is about the same as one day of an office worker's time, so this should soon be recouped in extra productivity."...

9 hours ago by openhgs on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Thomas Gellhaus

I also installed the KDE version; I also will probably try out razorqt since I really haven't had a chance to before. I'm looking forward to the...

19 hours ago by Thomas Gellhaus via Facebook on Mageia 2 Released
francisabigail

Acquiring when reinvention/cannibalization is too challenging for a large organization can be an excellent strategy- still, so many mergers stumble...

22 hours ago by francisabigail on Ariba buy parks SAP on Oracle's cloud turf
apexwm

All of the feedback regarding using a touch monitor for a desktop PC is right on. Several months ago, we installed a "demo" multitouch all-in-one...

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
191706

anyone wanting to triple boot *their* own Mac

1 day ago by 191706 on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
SoapyTablet

Cont.. Biggest Bugbear: Win7's stop-animate-go approach to work, you develop a staggered (not in the above alchohol sense of the word) approach to...

1 day ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
SoapyTablet

Ah the joys of Windows 8 Consumer Preview... If Windows 7 was 'Vista with Lipstick', whats Windows 8? Vista with Lipstick, the morning after?...

1 day ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
daveveej

Though the metro look is quite cool on the windows mobile platform I think that think that microsoft ARE MESSING THINGS UP because what has they...

1 day ago by daveveej on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Custonian

I agree, we have a few touch screen monitors in work but as Windows7 and the applications we use are not touch screen friendly (the size of the...

1 day ago by Custonian on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
archerthom

I find it amusing that Microsoft added the mouse, which was deemed awkward, but people were forced to use it so it stuck, and now they're saying,...

1 day ago by archerthom on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
BrownieBoy

Agree with other comments. Nobody's going to start reaching out to start tapping their desktop monitors with their fingers. Their arms would tire...

2 days ago by BrownieBoy on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Random_Error

The only way a touch monitor would be any good is if it were horizontal on the desk, with a virtual keyboard so you could do away with that as well...

2 days ago by Random_Error on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake