Home Office proclaims security of ID cards scheme

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

The National Identity Register will have tight access controls, stringent security and no risk of "discs flying around", MPs have been told.

Home Office minister Meg Hillier defended the government's plans for its National Identity Scheme, as she faced questions about data security from a committee of MPs.

Hillier, who has responsibility for ID cards, said it was important to win public confidence in the scheme, particularly following a number of recent cases in which the government has misplaced or lost confidential data.

The biggest loss was at HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). It lost two discs containing the details of 25 million families when they were sent to the National Audit Office by courier.

"From the point of view of the National Identity Register, there would not be discs flying around in that way. Anything that was ever downloaded would be encrypted. There would be severe access controls," said Hillier.

Hillier said that human error was involved in the HMRC data loss, whereas fewer than 100 people will have access to the National Identity Register.

Committee member Bob Russell said that this was a case of the government putting "all its eggs in one basket". But Hillier said there would actually be two "baskets": one database for biometrics, such as fingerprints and facial records, and another for biographical information.

The government will also create an "identity custodian", to whom members of the public could apply about any accesses to their ID records.

Dr Duncan Hine, director of National Identity Scheme integrity for the Identity and Passport Service, told the committee that the biometric data will be held at a higher level of security than the biographical information. He said that the vast majority of accesses will be initiated by the individual concerned, for example when they buy a house and need to prove their identity.

In rare cases the security services will be able to access the database, but not the NHS or police, the committee heard.

James Clappison MP expressed concern that European institutions will have access to ID card data. He asked exactly which bodies would be allowed access and in what circumstances. Hillier said that the number of institutions was too many to list, but any organisation requesting access would have to prove it needed the information as part of an ongoing investigation.

The National Identity Register will be very similar to the passport database and Hillier said: "The passport database is certainly a very secure database. The average man and woman in the street are not worried about it."

Asked if the government had gauged public opinion on identity cards, Hillier said the latest official findings were that 60 percent of citizens were in favour.

Committee member Martin Salter warned that, if the security of the National Identity Register was breached, "it could be catastrophic for the individuals concerned".

Philippe Martin, senior analyst at Kable, said: "The government appears to be moving the debate about identity away from ID cards and towards a National Identity Register."

"This could indicate a postponement of ID cards for UK nationals, as the government changes the direction of the scheme away from providing a card to facilitate access to services and towards collecting information about citizens," said Martin.

Talkback

If, as the government say, fewer than 100 people will have access to the data in it, what is it going to be used for?

Is it simply gathering personal information for the sake of holding that information with no clear purpose in mind?

After all, if it cannot be accessed by the police, as the government have said, then it will be no use for verifying identity during spot checks.

They suggest it will need to be accessed to prove one's identity for buying a house. Pointless - everyone will simply buy houses through companies or trusts who do not require identity cards.

But this implies individuals will need to prove their identity by means of access to the national identity database. Which less than 100 people have access to. Does this suggest a bottleneck to anyone else?

Or is the plan to start with under 100 people having access, then once the data is collected, expand it so that pretty much anyone can access it.

The awful thing about data theft is that it only has to happen once. Once the data is stolen, the theft cannot be reversed. There is no point in acting after the event to beef up security - the data is now no longer secure, since it has been stolen and the stolen copy is no longer controlled by the authorities.

With this in mind, there needs to be a really good reason for putting all this personal identity data about UK residents in a central database.

mmfb123 28 February, 2008 13:53
Reply

"Hillier said that human error was involved in the HMRC data loss, whereas fewer than 100 people will have access to the National Identity Register."

.. but she can't even keep the story straight within the same interview ...

"James Clappison MP [..] asked exactly which bodies would be allowed access and in what circumstances. Hillier said that the number of institutions was too many to list .."

So which is it?

Unless this is a revelation that this Government Minister can't count up to 100, there does seem to be a fairly large discontinuity here.

You know what; I don't think they're even really trying any more .. least ways I hope they're not .. if this is them actually trying, then we've got bigger problems than the NIR.

Andrew Meredith 28 February, 2008 14:31
Reply

"Asked if the government had gauged public opinion on identity cards, Hillier said the latest official findings were that 60 percent of citizens were in favour."

However, the link under this text goes to an article that says:

"According to an ICM poll, 25 percent of those surveyed thought it was a "very bad" idea [..] 50 percent said the cards were a bad idea in the ICM poll, 47 percent of those questioned still thought they were a good idea. And 12 percent of that group thought they were a "very good" idea."

Either the author is pointing out that she got her maths wrong .. "no = 50%" + "yes = 60%" equates to "110% of those polled expressed an opinion" ... the author has linked to an article about a different survey ... or the article linked to has the ICM numbers wrong.

Inquiring minds etc .... :)

Andrew Meredith 28 February, 2008 14:42
Reply

Andrew

Thanks for your talkback. As this story is taken from a partner network, we don't have access to all the resources they used to create this story.

This meant that we didn't actually have a story on our site about the latest government figures so opted to link through to the next most relevant content.

As you know statistics - especially in the hands of the government - are fluid at best hence the reason for the 10 percent difference.

thanks

andrewdonoghue 28 February, 2008 15:32
Reply

Fair comment.

Does anyone happen to know what survey she is actually referring to. We all accept, of course, the "lies, damned lies & statistics" effect, particularly in the hands of skilled spin-masters, but there is usually a grain of something on which to base said spin.

Andrew Meredith 28 February, 2008 16:23
Reply

I would just to say 'Hear Hear'

BUT I would like to mention one of my greatest concerns about this and nearly everything else put out by anyone in in any kind of authority these days.

Just how much, or how little, should we actually believe or is it all just dissembling.

I fear that the health of a (our) nation is seriously undermined by the normality of the routine untruthfulness of its leaders. I couldn't fit the word 'integrety' into that sentence but, actually, integrity is fast becoming a dim and distant concept, disappearing in the mists of time.

Moley 28 February, 2008 21:14
Reply

That's

I would just like to say 'Hear Hear'

....................

Moley 28 February, 2008 21:16
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. OK, I acknowledge that 'most' was a gratuitous throwaway comment as an afterthought and too presumptuous. As to proof, as you...

3 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Jack Schofield

@BrownieBoy > Works really well for thieves.... >> Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally >> irrelevant, even...

5 hours ago by Jack Schofield on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
raskolnikof

fantastic that the so called piracy bills have been withdrawn. however, these anti-democracy supporters are still in the shadows so lets be alert...

5 hours ago by raskolnikof on SOPA, Protect IP support wavers in face of online protest
Tony Douglas

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

8 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.
BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

22 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

1 day ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 day ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

3 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

3 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany