Microsoft: Hole exploit threatens all IE versions

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

An unpatched security hole in Internet Explorer that is being exploited affects all versions of the browser, making it more serious than originally believed when it was first publicised on 10 December, Microsoft has said.

Microsoft is investigating reports of attacks against a new vulnerability in IE but said in an update to a security advisory issued late on Thursday that all versions of IE are potentially vulnerable.

The company recommends setting the internet zone security setting to 'high' and using access control lists to disable Ole32db.dll to provide the most effective protection against an attack.

"Our latest information is that there are still limited attacks seeking to load malicious software on vulnerable systems," Christopher Budd writes in the Microsoft Security Response Center blog.

Microsoft has seen several hundred detections of exploits from around the globe, though the sites taking advantage of the vulnerability appear to be hosted on Chinese domains, Microsoft said in a Microsoft Malware Protection Center blog.

"The exploit sites we've seen so far drop a wide variety of malware — most commonly password stealers like new variants of game password stealers like Win32/OnLineGames, and Win32/Lolyda; keyloggers like Win32/Lmir; Trojan horse applications like Win32/Helpud along with some previously unseen malware which we generically detect as Win32/SystemHijack," the Malware Protection Center blog said. "We fully expect the variety of malware being dropped by this exploit to broaden as the exploit code starts to circulate around the internet underground," it added.

People visiting trusted sites could also be affected from sites targeted by SQL injection attacks through which malicious code is injected into sites, Microsoft says.

A Microsoft spokesman said he could not say when a fix would come. The next Patch Tuesday is scheduled for 13 January.

Microsoft's updated advisory lists a number of mitigating factors: Protected Mode in IE7 and IE8 in Windows Vista limits the impact of the vulnerability; IE on Windows Server 2003 and 2008 runs in a restricted mode known as Enhanced Security Configuration that sets the security level for the internet to high; the attacker could only gain the same user rights as the local user; known attacks can not exploit the issue automatically through email.

Talkback

I have removed the IE icon from my desktop, and threatened my grandkids
with expulsion if I catch them using IE. IE has always been an accident waiting to happen. One would think Redmond would have rebuilt this POS a long time ago. They are only helping Firefox,and other browsers.

ator1940 15 December, 2008 13:42
Reply

Ator, for the first time that I can recall, I disagree with you. IE is not an accident waiting to happen, it has already happened, over and over and over again, and it continues to do so.

I have a standard question that I ask of people when this kind of issue comes up. Would you accept this sort of behavior from anything else that you own? What if your TV turned itself off every once in a while, or changed stations at random? Or your car? What if you had a home security system, and it just didn't work sometimes, so people could occasionally, but not always, walk into your house at will, or it needlessly sounded alarms at the police station.

Of course they wouldn't. But we are all supposed to be in awe of Bill Gates, and Microsoft, and this wonderful thing that they have created that is far beyond the ability of mere mortals like us to comprehend, so if there are occasional "glitches", that is supposed to be perfectly acceptable.

jw

J.A. Watson 15 December, 2008 14:53
Reply

I stand corrected, Mr Watson. You are quite right in that this quality of merchandise would not be acceptable in any other industry. I have always said the manufacturer of a product should be held responsible for any defects, and this includes software. Also, forcing consumers to pay for this software, pre-installed on a new computer, should be illegal, and refundable, if the consumer doesn't want it. If someone steals your identity by breaking into a bank's system, the software manufacturer should be held liable, but no, it is blamed on the IT department. Microsoft security is a contradiction in terms.

ator1940 16 December, 2008 13:48
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

This is the second time in 18 months that Microsoft has gone out of band to release an emergency patch (last time being October for the RPC issue) for the Internet Explorer, which is being actively exploited right now. There has been Proof of Concept (POC) code for the exploit available since December 11th. Coming just the week before christmas and given the wide use of IE within business enterprises and severity of the vulnerability, clearly IT professionals need to patch this vulnerability as soon as business conditions permit. There were over 100 websites on the Dec 11th hosting some type of malware associated with this vulnerability. Today, that has grown to thousands of sites now hosting the malware.

Microsoft felt this issue warranted an out of band patch due to the underlying exploit being actively used in the wild and damage was mounting. Their are reports of up to 6000 compromised web sites hosting web pages that take advantage of the vulnerability.

A recent study titled “Understanding the Web browser Threat: Examination of Vulnerable Online Web browser Populations and the Insecurity Iceberg" found that 57% of IE users were not running the most current version that’s patched. This will be a wake up call to IT professionals to make sure to patch their browsers. This speaks volumes to the underlying problem with web-borne malware. We as a community are constantly trying to outsmart the bad guys on their delivery method. However, it is not necessarily a delivery / obfuscation issue – the underlying issue is a failure to patch, including their browsers. A recent Verizon study showed that over 70% the exploits used in web-borne malware had vendor patches available for up to a year and less then 1% had patches available within a 30 day window. The web-borne malware issue is a patch management issue and can be simply fixed by patching in a timely fashion according to industry best practices.

lumension 18 December, 2008 19:46
Reply

...it is still there on more than half the Microsoft PCs out there.

PeterJudge 19 December, 2008 09:55
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

8 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

16 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

18 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

18 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

20 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

22 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

23 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

24 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

24 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint