Many UK companies are failing to comply with regulations governing the sending of unsolicited emails, according to a survey released by a direct marketing services vendor.
The survey, published by CDMS this week, claims that 31 percent of UK companies do not comply with the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, which bans UK companies from spamming private individuals.
However, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), which is the watchdog responsible for enforcing the privacy and electronic communications regulations (PECR), has claimed that the results of the survey do not match its own experience.
The regulations say companies should only send unsolicited sales messages via email to non-customers if they have actively agreed that they want to receive them. In practice, this means that whenever someone's details are recorded — for instance, as part of a money-off promotion or competition — they must be asked whether they want to receive subsequent sales marketing e-messages from that company or any other third party.
CDMS claims that offering someone the opportunity to opt out of receiving unsolicited emails or pre-ticking an opt-in box does not comply with the regulations. Instead, customers must actively agree to receive such messages.
Companies in different sectors, including banking, insurance, retail, and telecoms, were asked whether they consistently offered non-customers the opportunity to actively consent to further marketing emails when their details were recorded as the result of a promotion or enquiry.
Only 69 percent of the companies polled said they did offer non-customers the opportunity to opt-in to further promotions before sending mail.
While the ICO stopped short of actively disagreeing with the results of the survey, it said it hadn't seen evidence that large numbers of UK companies were flouting the law.
"It doesn't really chime with the ICO's experience," said an ICO spokeswoman. "We've had a fairly low number of complaints over a three-year period."
The ICO tends to pursue enforcement actions when it receives complaints about unsolicited junk email. Since the regulations came into force in UK law in 2004, the ICO has received only three complaints about insurance marketing, 14 about travel marketing, 10 about telecoms and five about lenders.
However, the ICO admitted that the number of complaints it has received may not reflect the number of instances of unsolicited email sent by UK companies.
"Mainly we act when we receive complaints, but because of the number of UK companies it's difficult for us to know when they are complying with the directive," said the ICO spokeswoman.
Talkback
It seems that no matter what the law or how sophisticated our spam filters we still end up with unsolicited mail. The fact that so few are complaining makes me think maybe I should have a moan to ICO the next time I am hit with SPAM from a UK business.
Also the opt-in/opt-out tick boxes on some sites are sometimes cunningly displayed in a way to increase the number of people "agreeing" to mail.
They may phrase the question in a strange way which makes you think ticking the box means opt-out when it really is opt-in. Or they have a list of tick boxes that need to be ticked to continue such as "I agree to terms" and "I confirm that this is my address" and then the mail opt-in comes straight after so the unwary tick all boxes and continue.
Despite this amount and type of spam I get from UK businesses do not annoy me - they are usually easy to opt out of and sometimes have serices or products that I may actually be interested in. It's the US junk that comes through, every few minutes it seems, that I can't stand. Even if the spam laws are obeyed here it won't make too much difference to my mailbox while other contries are free to waste my bandwidth, time and test my patience.