Security experts welcome adware fines

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Adware

NEWS

Security experts have welcomed a legal settlement that has held advertisers responsible for adware for the first time in the US.

Communications company Cingular Wireless and travel company Priceline agreed on Monday to pay fines of $35,000 (£18,000) each for promoting products and services through adware. Travel company Travelocity agreed to pay $30,000 (£15,000).

According to the New York Attorney General's Office, the adware — software that automatically displays adverts to a computer user — was "deceptively installed" on users' machines.

"Advertisers will now be held responsible when their ads end up on consumers' computers without full notice and consent," New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said in a statement. "Advertisers can no longer insulate themselves from liability by turning a blind eye to how their advertisements are delivered, or by placing ads through intermediaries, such as media buyers. New Yorkers have suffered enough with unwanted adware programs and this agreement goes a long way towards clamping down on this odious practice."

Priceline, Travelocity and Cingular Wireless agreed to pay the fines to the State of New York following an investigation by the New York Attorney General's Office into a company called Direct Revenue.

In a lawsuit filed in April 2006, Cuomo alleged that Direct Revenue installed adware programs onto millions of computers worldwide that delivered a steady stream of advertisements, monitored websites visited by users, and collected data typed into web forms — without adequate notice to or the consent of consumers.

In addition, the adware programs were difficult to remove, and consumers who had previously downloaded the company's programs without being given full notice and consent, known as "legacy users", continued to receive Priceline, Travelocity and Cingular ads through those programs. The Attorney General discovered that Priceline, Travelocity and Cingular, among others, spent hundreds of thousands of dollars delivering ads through Direct Revenue software.

Simon Perry, vice president of security strategy for CA, said on Wednesday that companies should be held accountable for adverts displayed through adware, as legitimate marketing spend is playing a key role in supporting the adware business.

"If you follow the money, it's legitimate marketing spend that's supporting the creation and delivery of adware to people's screens. It's an undesirable industry that's being fed. There should be accountability, through that money trail," Perry told ZDNet UK. "Adware only exists to turn a profit, and legitimate companies are feeding that model."

Perry added that adware is undesirable for businesses because third-party applications are running on machines and transporting information out of the company, which comprises a privacy breach. The applications can be difficult to remove.

Adware is also undesirable for systems administrators as it uses up bandwidth and generates helpdesk calls, and is undesirable for end users as it subverts browser sessions, records information about browsing habits, and collects information typed into web forms, which is a breach of privacy, said Perry.

Perry said that adware could also harm a brand, as ad content and the method of delivery are often not separated in people's minds.

"In the mind of the consumer there is a negative reaction to the company because of the method of delivery," said Perry. "If someone put up a billboard in front of Stonehenge, and I paid for a CA advert on it, people would have a negative reaction to CA, and regulators would hold us accountable."

Monday's agreements require that Priceline, Travelocity and Cingular Wireless deliver online ads only through companies that:

  • Provide full disclosure of the name of the applicable adware program and any bundled software
  • Brand each advertisement with a prominent and easily identifiable brand name or icon
  • Fully describe the adware and obtain consumer consent to both download and run the adware
  • Make it practicable for consumers to remove the adware from their computers
  • Obtain consent to continue serving ads to legacy users
  • Require their affiliates to meet all these same requirements

The agreements also require Priceline, Travelocity and Cingular to engage in due diligence with respect to selecting and utilising adware providers. Prior to contracting with a company to deliver their ads, and quarterly thereafter, the companies must investigate how their online ads are delivered. The companies must immediately cease using adware programs that violate the settlement agreements or their own adware policies.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

9 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

3 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

5 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

6 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

12 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

14 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

14 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

16 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

17 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

17 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

19 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

19 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

19 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

19 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions