Building secure foundations for e-Conveyancing

ANALYSIS
A paperless system could save as much as £30 million per annum in reduced administration, according to some estimates. The Land Registry's consultation is just the first step in a huge project to reconstruct a 140 year-old system of land registration. Its aim is to have a pilot e-conveyancing system in place by late 2005 or early 2006. Legal and practical context A legal framework is now in place which allows -- in theory -- for paperless transactions in the property context. The Electronic Communications Act 2000 gives Ministers the power to update the statute book to permit the use of e-communications in specific contexts. Such a draft order relating to e-conveyancing was issued for consultation last year. When enacted, this will disapply paper -based requirements for contracts for sale of land, mortgages, and other property documentation under existing legislation. The Land Registration Act 2002 which reached the statute book earlier this year and which will come into force in 2003, sets out a broad legal framework for establishing a system of electronic conveyancing. The next step is therefore to devise an electronic network linking conveyancers, lenders and other property professionals with the Land Registry and the Inland Revenue to enable every stage of the process -- from investigation of title, exchange of contracts, and payment, through to completion and registration -- to be carried out online. Key issues The wide-ranging and lengthy consultation document flags a great number of issues for consideration. In particular, it highlights the following key requirements of an e-conveyancing system: it will be paperless; there should be no gap between completion of a transaction and updating of the Land Register, it should allow for "chain transparency" -- thereby making chain transactions less stressful for those involved; it should involve a permanent connection between property practitioners and the Land Registry; it should be more secure and fraud-resistant than the present system; and it should allow for simultaneous money transfers. The IT dimension IT suppliers, as well as lenders and conveyancers, could stand to gain from a fully electronic network. One of the next steps in the process will be for the Land Registry to find private sector partners to work on the design and creation of the new system. From a technical perspective, the proposals raise a number of interesting issues which include:
  • Interoperability: interoperability issues will need to be addressed to ensure that users are able to connect to the central system from a range of different software platforms;
  • Network access agreements: agreements will need to be put in place for those accessing the system in order to ensure appropriate levels of security.
  • Security issues: as so much is at stake and because the conveyancing process has always been a target for fraud, security will be paramount. Safeguards will need to be built in to prevent unauthorised access -- and to ensure that any breaches are detected rapidly -- and to ensure that those with access use the system only for properly authorised purposes. The technology will need to provide a clear audit trail to make it clear who does what, and when. Filters and firewalls will be needed to prevent hacking as far as possible. Users of the system, e.g. conveyancing firms, will need to follow appropriate security procedures.
  • Electronic signatures and digital certificates: electronic signatures and digital certificates are among the options considered to make electronic documents secure. At this stage it is envisaged that secure e-signatures based on public key infrastructure (PKI) will be used, however the consultation seeks views on suitable alternatives. The document also seeks views on the use of certification to ensure authenticity of e-conveyancing documents. Online conveyancing offers a significant opportunity to boost the more widespread use of e-signatures.
  • Electronic funds transfer: speeding up the transfer of funds is an important element of the proposed new system. The consultation considers the scope of such a system (i.e. whether it should be capable of dealing with all the payments which change hands during the course of a conveyancing transaction, including stamp duty, land registry fees and solicitors' fees) or simply the transfer of the mortgage/sale proceeds from lender to buyer and then to the seller. It also looks at the options for electronic funds transfer based on systems already in existence such as CHAPS and CREST. Timescale
The deadline for responses to the current consultation is 30th August. A series of more detailed discussions or consultations commencing in 2003 will then focus on specific areas, including detailed systems design, the use of e-signatures, and drafting network access agreements. The IT procurement stage is expected to take about two years, with a working system being built during 2004/2005. The aim is to launch a pilot by late 2005/ early 2006 and to roll out a voluntary system during 2006. By the Government's own acknowledgement, this is not a system which will appear overnight. If you would like more details about the IT implications of the proposals, please contact Marc Dautlich
Have your say instantly in the Tech Update forum. Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our Guided Tour. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

4 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

4 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

5 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

7 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

7 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

7 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

7 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

10 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

12 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

12 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

13 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

14 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

15 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

23 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility