Cut out the risks of Web services

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
IT executives spend a lot of time these days thinking about how to lower costs, improve security, and deliver IT as a business service. New development tools and infrastructure technologies that can help fulfill these goals are in high demand in spite of the current recession. But what should IT do when a technology innovation helps improve some goals while it hinders others? CIOs are struggling with this paradox with a very visible new IT technology -- Web services. First, let's examine the positives. Web services are flexible and reusable -- attributes that help IT develop applications quickly while simultaneously reducing costs. In a software development project using Web services, Motorola Corporation reduced its development project cycle and costs by 30 percent. Those are metrics that every CIO wants to achieve. Now let's review the downside. Web services-specific security is nonexistent. Standards bodies like the W3C and OASIS are working diligently toward a solution, but Web services on the Internet today are completely defenseless against cyberterrorists and hackers. This level of exposure is far too risky for most IT executives. Do the current risks of Web services outweigh the benefits? Should CIOs eschew Web services until hardened security technologies and standards arise? No! As the Motorola example illustrates, Web services offer benefits today regardless of their security profile. What's more, IT shops that delay Web services development today will face skills deficits and steep learning curves as security matures. A plan is needed
CIOs need a plan that promotes Web services benefits while minimising security risks. Smart IT executives will take an aggressive but pragmatic approach to Web services by adhering to the following policies: Policy #1
Start Web services efforts on corporate projects. The best place to begin Web services is within IT itself. Choose a project, such as integrating management tool data, that will result in an immediate payback and give the staff a chance to learn Web services technology in their own backyard. Once IT gets the hang of Web services project subtleties, move on to business requirements, such as improving business processes or sharing data between groups. These internal Web services efforts provide a low-risk classroom for IT to enhance its proficiency, accelerate projects, and decrease costs. Policy #2
Prepare internal systems. To ease future application development efforts, CIOs should look at their existing applications inventory and decide how to expose it to Web services development. Packaged applications from vendors such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Seibel already support Web services interfaces, while software infrastructure providers such as Iona, Tibco, and Vitria are adding new Web services features to ease application integration. Homegrown applications should also be added to the list. Once you understand how to extend applications with Web services, determine which ones should come first. This planning effort will help IT set priorities so it can get the highest return on Web services and also determine how much work to anticipate over the long-term. The IT staff can also begin to explore creative ways to exploit Web services to drive new revenue, automate business processes, and cut costs. Policy #3
Keep the security group involved. Rather than deal with Web services security in isolation, IT managers must keep the security team informed about Web services applications, security standards progress, known bugs, and future plans. The security team can then assess whether Web services projects meet with business requirements, government regulations, and its own technology agenda. Open communication and collaboration with the security team will ensure that Web services applications will be included in the enterprise security plan and minimise any future surprises. Policy #4
Get involved with Web services security standards. Security-conscious CIOs should have their developers and security managers review security standards proposals to see if they meet their business requirements. Will the XML Key Management Specification (XKMS) scale to meet the volume needs of the financial services industry? How will XML encryption be implemented? What's included in WS-Security? Make sure to receive regular reports from IT staff and technology vendors. If you're not satisfied, push on partners such as IBM, Microsoft, and Sun to advance your cause. They, too, have a vested interest in getting Web services security right -- as soon as possible. Policy #5
Cooperate with outsiders. Just as developers should share their Web services plans with the security and business teams, make sure that your company is sharing its Web services plans with trusted business partners, suppliers, and large customers. Be cautious and keep this number small and selected to minimise your own security risk. Find out what types of applications would be most beneficial to them. Which of their systems will they enable with Web services interfaces? What are their security requirements? Collaborative planning with external constituencies will help set budget requirements, project schedules, and overall goals, and will also reveal opportunities where Web services can accelerate business processes, improve customer service, or cut costs. Remember that you can always secure Web services to a partner through existing network security technologies such as VPNs, PKI, and digital certificates. Policy #6
Anticipate management and operations needs. As development and security matures, Web services will become mission-critical applications with extensive management and operations requirements. Will Web services require sophisticated management tools from vendors such as BMC, Dirig, or HP? (The answer is probably yes.) Will you need specific processes and procedures to deal with Web services that touch your business partners' systems? (The answer here is probably also yes.) To anticipate these needs, add management and operations to your planning now. The bottom line
IT executives need to ignore all the hype to get moving ahead on Web services. The Internet technology boom is dead and gone, and Web services won't do a thing to change this fact. But don't make the mistake of dismissing Web services outright because of immature security. By taking a pragmatic approach, CIOs can benefit from Web services, lower costs, and minimise risk. Now, that ought to keep the CEO and CFO happy.
Have your say instantly in the Tech Update forum. Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our Guided Tour. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

4 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

5 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

6 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

7 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

7 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

7 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

8 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

8 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

9 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

9 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

9 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

12 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

13 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

13 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

15 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

16 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

17 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility