Making sense of remote access

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
Setting up remote access servers and connections in Windows can be somewhat overwhelming and confusing if you don't understand the protocol configuration options involved. You have a number of remote access protocol options to choose from, and deciding which ones to use will depend on the functionality you need, your system configuration, and your hardware and communications capabilities. To help make sense of all these options, we'll take a look at the categories of protocols and the advantages and disadvantages of the various protocols within each one. Categories and choices
First, you need to consider two distinct methods of remote access, each of which uses different protocols:
  • Dial-up
  • Virtual private networking (VPN)
Within each method, there are three basic categories for protocols:
  • Connectivity
  • Authentication
  • Data encryption
In making decisions about which protocol to use, you must remember two things. First, you want the best security you can provide for the remote session. You want authentication to be encrypted so that someone who is snooping cannot see it, and you want the data that is passed in the remote session to be encrypted for the same reason. Second, older systems and their associated protocols are less capable in terms of encryption than newer systems, so you need to be aware of when you may have to use the older protocols and what you're giving up when you do. Let's take a look at the protocols for dial-up connectivity, authentication, and encryption. Then, we will do the same for VPN remote access. Dialing up a connection
Dial-up involves one modem connecting with another over the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), creating a temporary, dedicated WAN link. There are three possible protocols for making the initial connection: Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP), Serial Line Internet Protocol (SLIP), and Asynchronous NetBEUI (AsyBEUI). Table A explains their differences. Table A

DIAL-UP CONNECTIVITY

PROTOCOL

WHEN USED

NOTES

Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)

PPP is almost always the protocol of choice for both server and client.  It is required
if encryption is to be used in the dial-up session.

Supports TCP/IP as well as other LAN protocols such as IPX/SPX, AppleTalk, and DECnet.

Serial Line Internet Protocol (SLIP)

SLIP is used as a client in NT or Win2K only when necessary to connect to an older server that is not supporting PPP.

Allows TCP/IP connections only and does not support WINS or DHCP.

Asynchronous NetBEUI (AsyBEUI)

This is a Microsoft proprietary remote access protocol used only for legacy systems such as early versions of Windows NT, Windows for Workgroups, or DOS.

Supports only the NetBEUI LAN protocol.

Authenticating the user
Part of the dial-up process involves authentication, usually by providing a password. Since that password can be intercepted and used to gain unauthorized access, it should be encrypted using the strongest possible method that is supported by both the server and the client. It's important to remember that PPP is the only dial-up protocol that supports encryption. If you must use SLIP or AsyBEUI, the only authentication protocol you can use is PAP. Table B outlines the differences between the available authentication protocols. Table B

DIAL-UP AUTHENTICATION

PROTOCOL

WHEN USED

NOTES

Password Authentication Protocol (PAP)

Used only when the server requires a plaintext password.

This protocol passes the password without encryption and so is not secure.

Shiva Password Authentication Protocol (SPAP)

Developed as an improvement to PAP for use with Shiva LAN Rover products.

Uses a very weak encryption scheme.

Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)

Probably the most commonly used dial-up protocol for authentication.

Uses reversibly encrypted passwords for greater security.  However, the passwords are stored on the RAS server in plaintext.

Microsoft Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (MS-CHAP) Version 1

As a Microsoft proprietary protocol, MS-CHAP was developed for use with the Windows operating system.

Similar to CHAP but allows storage of passwords on the server in encrypted format.

Microsoft Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (MS-CHAP) Version 2

As a Microsoft proprietary protocol, MS-CHAP was developed for use with the Windows operating system.

Similar to MS-CHAP Version 1 but requires mutual authentication and different encryption keys when sending and receiving, and so is more secure than MS-CHAP v. 1.

Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)

EAP was designed as an extension to PPP to be able to use newer authentication methods such as one-time passwords, smart cards, or biometric techniques.

There are two different types of EAP, and both the server and client must be using the same type:
·  

EAP-MD5 CHAP Used primarily for password-based security
·  

EAP-TLS Used primarily for certificate-based security.

Talkback

Can I use my home printer when using remote access?

via Facebook 16 March, 2005 10:27
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

5 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

7 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

8 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

9 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

10 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

10 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

10 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

11 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

11 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

12 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

12 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

12 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

15 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

16 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

16 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

17 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

18 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

20 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility