Why not consolidate Intel servers onto the mainframe?

With a mainframe, the servers-per-head ratio is inverted, and several staff members may be required per server. But this ratio has to be balanced against the mission-critical nature of the applications being run. Two other factors have to play a part in this equation. One is the reliability of the servers in a production environment. The other is processor utilisation. When it comes to reliability, mainframes have a well-established track record. There are also some cost factors that are not always immediately obvious when reliability is considered, since more than just the cost of maintenance is involved. These days, even planned maintenance downtime affects an enterprise operating continuously, where multiple Intel-based servers must be set against one mainframe. The total cost of downtime has to include the cost to the business of not having the server(s) available in the production environment. This will include estimating the number of staff affected, multiplied by the average salary, including benefits. This leads to a real, direct, cost per minute of downtime for the business. In addition, you must factor in the cost to the enterprise of possible lost business while servers (and services) are unavailable. Processor utilisation is the amount of time the server processor actually spends performing useful work. With Intel-based servers, IBM estimates this to be normally between three and seven percent, although it can rise to as much as 30 percent for considerable periods of time with some applications. This means, of course, that even with compute-intensive applications, the processor spends more time inactive than actually working. With a mainframe, processor utilisation is significantly higher. The price of software Software pricing is also an important issue, particularly where users have, or are considering, Intel as a server platform throughout the enterprise. This is also an area where mainframe systems have traditionally been at a disadvantage. However, the pricing models now available to applications vendors in the Intel server market could actually make software more costly for Intel systems than for mainframes. For example, some applications in the Intel sector are priced per processor, while some are priced per processor engine. This is an increasingly important difference, which can be demonstrated by the following example. Take a typical Intel-based enterprise environment of 100 servers, each using four processors. Applications priced on the per-processor model could cost four times as much. And with the move by Intel's OEMs toward eight-processor systems, this will obviously become even more significant. If an application is important to the business process, software licenses could easily grow to be both a cost burden and a complex management problem. Linux applications are often priced on a per-processor-engine basis. So coupled with the mainframe's ability to run virtual servers on a single physical processor engine, dramatic cost savings are possible. Taking this thought a little further, 15 servers per head is considered to be a leading-edge environment for Intel-based systems, so the per-head figure for a mainframe looks poor by comparison. But in practice, the system design allows some significant cost advantages to be gained over Intel servers running either Linux or Windows. For example, under Z/VM, it is possible to double -- and sometimes triple -- the best Intel-based figure for the number of servers per head by creating multiple virtual servers within the mainframe. Where the servers are running relatively simple tasks such as file and print, even greater long-term savings can be made. This is because it takes a matter of a few seconds to clone a new virtual Linux server on the zSeries machines. Such virtual servers will be running on just one engine, so additional software license costs can be saved. In addition, these can be true clones that can be managed in exactly the same way. If another processor is added to the mainframe, the whole process can be replicated without requiring additional staff, thus extending the server-per-head figure even further. This availability of a uniform environment for virtual servers also overcomes a practical problem when using supposedly "standardised" Intel servers, which are available from a wide range of sources. The common management approach will be to select servers that are the lowest cost needed to run a specific application. In the short term, this can appear to be a significant cost saving, but in the long term has several drawbacks. If the servers come from different suppliers, there will be the inevitable variations in core software from vendors seeking differentiation in the marketplace. These will rarely be "clone" systems and will therefore demand individual management. The alternative -- to select one server type for all applications -- will demand that the biggest and most powerful is selected for all applications. Final analysis Using these issues as arguments in a consolidation equation is, IBM believes, the way to identify the TCO issues over the lifetime of a production environment. As Web-based services proliferate around the core business functions, it is inevitable that the number of servers needed to run them will grow around the core mainframe. But if they can be run on the mainframe, often alongside mission-critical applications, costs of procurement, management, and licensing can be controlled and reduced.

For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the Enterpise newsletter. Tell us what you think in the Enterprise Mailroom.

« Previous
1
2
Next »

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

> I'm told it's somewhat annoying when people have their Macs stolen > and Apple stores treat the thief as the owner, but there you go. Ouch,...

4 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks

@kevinmchapman. OK, I acknowledge that 'most' was a gratuitous throwaway comment as an afterthought and too presumptuous. As to proof, as you...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

@BrownieBoy > Works really well for thieves.... >> Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally >> irrelevant, even...

6 hours ago by Jack Schofield on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks

fantastic that the so called piracy bills have been withdrawn. however, these anti-democracy supporters are still in the shadows so lets be alert...

6 hours ago by raskolnikof on SOPA, Protect IP support wavers in face of online protest

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

9 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

23 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

1 day ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 day ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint