New flaw in NT and Windows 2000 servers

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
Microsoft is getting off to a hot start in 2003. Its first Security Bulletin of the year (MS03-01) is rated critical because it addresses a flaw that can open up Windows NT 4 and Windows 2000 servers to arbitrary code execution by a remote attacker. This is a buffer overrun problem that is related to an unchecked buffer in the Locator service. A malformed request can cause the service to fail or run arbitrary code. Applicability This vulnerability affects:
  • Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
  • Microsoft Windows NT 4.0, Terminal Server Edition
  • Microsoft Windows 2000
  • Microsoft Windows XP
To learn whether a particular installation is vulnerable, look up the status of the RPC Locator in the Windows Services applet (Control Panel | Administrative Tools | Services, in Win2K and WinXP, or Control Panel | Services in NT 4.0). Check the Startup column. If it says Automatic, the service starts by default. If it says Manual, it must be manually started. To see a list of Windows services that are actually running at any time, simply open a command line and run net start. If Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Locator doesn't show up on the list, it isn't running. Risk level--moderate to critical For Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 workstations and Terminal Server Edition, as well as for all Windows XP installations, Microsoft rates this as a moderate threat. For NT 4.0 and Win2K domain controllers, this is a critical threat. Mitigating factors The Locator service is enabled by default only on Windows 2000 and NT 4.0 domain controllers. Firewalls that block NetBIOS traffic would eliminate any opportunity for a remote attack using this flaw from outside. The network would remain vulnerable to an internal attack or to an external attack if there is no properly configured firewall and the Locator service is running. Fix Microsoft strongly recommends that NT 4.0 and Win2K domain controllers be patched immediately, while other affected systems should be patched "at the earliest opportunity." See MS03-01 for links to the various available patches. As a workaround, you can simply disable the Locator service if you don't use it. Anyone with administrative access can set the RpcLocator service status to Disabled in the Services applet. To halt the Locator service from the command line, use the Sc.exe utility. For a description of this utility, just run sc. The command syntax is sc stop rpclocator. You can do this regardless of whether the service is running. If it isn't, you'll get the error message, "The service has not been started." To disable the service, Microsoft says to use this syntax: sc config rpclocator start= disabled. If successful, you will get a message similar to this: [SC] ChangeServiceConfig SUCCESS. Sc.exe is included with WinXP and is a part of the Windows 2000 Resource Kit. A Microsoft challenge This is an example of the kind of vulnerability that is practically forced on Microsoft by the demands for backward compatibility with older products. That's not an excuse for bad coding, but it does lead to a complex situation in which Microsoft must not only fix any new software but must also go back and fix all the known (and as-yet-undiscovered) problems in any software that the company still supports or with which the new software has to be backward compatible. Final word If you have a firewall in place, it should already be configured to block remote access to the Locator service. If it hasn't been, this is a good opportunity to update the settings. Looking at the bigger picture, the best way to mitigate problems with services such as this one is to make sure you don't enable any services by default, adding them only as needed. That puts a major burden on administrators -- something that's critical to remember when looking at a lot of these security threats. Microsoft installations tend to be more vulnerable, in part because lots of services are enabled by default. As a result, software is generally easier to install and configure and may require less skill on the part of administrators. By contrast, Linux/Unix has a security advantage because it doesn't enable as many services by default and generally requires more skill to install.

For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the

Tell us what you think in the
Enterprise Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

3 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

6 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

7 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

8 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

8 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

10 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

10 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

10 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

11 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

14 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

15 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

15 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

16 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

17 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

18 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility