Headless servers streamline admin

ANALYSIS
For ages, UNIX systems administrators have enjoyed the ability to run "headless" servers, increasing security while minimising the cost of managing multiple servers. What's a headless server?
A headless server generally lacks a monitor, keyboard, or mouse. In some instances, a headless server also excludes the video card. For the purposes of this article, I'll focus on servers that have video cards. Sounds rather morbid, doesn't it?
Despite the gruesome name, a headless server offers a number of advantages over a server with all of the input devices and displays attached. Most obvious is the space saved by not having a monitor, keyboard, and mouse lying around. There's also a hardware cost savings. You won't need to purchase a monitor, keyboard, or mouse, and you also save money by not purchasing KVM cables and switches. Consider this: In a 42U rack of 1U-high servers, going headless can save you the cost and tangle of a KVM and 48 cables running through your rack. In an environment where cabling is already tight, this adds up to significant time and cost savings. Going headless can be extremely beneficial in a multiple-server hosting situation. Running headless also enhances the physical security of the server. Without a keyboard, monitor, and mouse, an unauthorised user would be hard pressed to walk up to the server and do anything with it -- or to it. Running a headless server is not very difficult under Windows 2000 when you have a stable environment and the right components. Beyond making changes to your Windows 2000 server's BIOS, there's nothing fancy you have to do. Just install Windows 2000 as normal. Take the server to where you want to run it, along with a temporary mouse, keyboard, and monitor. Set the server up with the temporary devices and test it to make sure everything works. Then you can disconnect the mouse, keyboard, and monitor and walk away with them in tow. No keyboard + no monitor no administration
At this point, you may be wondering how you'd administer such a machine, or even boot it! Not to worry -- no keyboard plus no mouse does not equal no administration. You can set your BIOS to boot without a keyboard or monitor, and use remote administration software to manage your headless server. These days, the typical BIOS has the option to skip checks for a keyboard and monitor. If you decide to run headless, you'll first need to figure out how to accomplish this with your particular BIOS. Unfortunately, I can't give you precise instructions on how to do it because the routine varies from server to server. Check the documentation for your BIOS. The next hurdle comes in the area of system administration. As you might imagine, administering your server without mouse, keyboard, or monitor requires a different approach. This is where remote administration tools such as Terminal Services, VNC, or Remote Administrator come into play. Before chopping off your server's head, you need to prepare the server to make sure that you can fully and remotely operate it. Without this vital step, your headless server efforts will be brain dead. Of these choices, I strongly recommend against using the Terminal Services that Microsoft included with Windows 2000 to remotely administer your headless server. If you use Terminal Services as a remote administration tool, be aware that there are certain administrative tasks that you won't be able to perform. Terminal Services provides you with a virtual console rather than simply redirecting the real console. Unfortunately, some applications don't operate well under such conditions -- most notably services that are designed to interact directly with the desktop, which includes VNC. If you try to run a service that interacts directly with the desktop from within a Terminal Services session, you often won't see important screens because they won't display remotely. Therefore, if you're going to run a headless server, you should install remote control software such as VNC or Remote Administrator. Remote control software works just as well for administering remote servers as it does your remote workstations. Anything you can do standing in front of the server with a local keyboard, mouse, and monitor, you can do remotely using these tools. Microsoft losing its head
Microsoft has started to realise that some of its customers want the option of using a headless server, and it's begun to support headless servers in new operating systems. Windows XP and the upcoming Windows .Net servers provide native support for headless server operations. In addition, new software called Emergency Management Services allows an administrator to interact with a system that might not be able to respond to network requests. Headless servers aren't as scary as they seem! In many situations, they may just be the answer to your multiple-server nightmares.
For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the
Enterpise newsletter. Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our
Guided Tour. Tell us what you think in the
Enterprise Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

5 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

7 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

9 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

10 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

10 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

11 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

11 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

12 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

12 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

12 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

12 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

13 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

16 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

17 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

17 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

18 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

19 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

20 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility