Sun and Fujitsu merge Sparc lines

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Sun Microsystems and Fujitsu will merge their Sparc processor-based server lines by mid-2006, the companies said on Tuesday.

"We're going to be bringing a series of low-range, midrange and high-end products to market," Sun chief executive Scott McNealy said at a news conference. The new products, under the code name Advanced Product Line (APL), will replace Sun's Sun Fire line and Fujitsu's Primepower products, the companies said.

Sun and Fujitsu currently sell servers that use two different chip families, Sun's UltraSparc and Fujitsu's Sparc64. The chips can run the same software, including Sun's Solaris operating system, but require different hardware designs.

Fujitsu already sells Sun's UltraSparc designs, but as part of the new agreement, Sun will also sell Fujitsu's Primepower systems during the transition period to the joint product line, McNealy said.

Sun and Fujitsu began eyeing expanded alliance options in 2003, when McNealy met with Fujitsu's chairman and former chief executive Naoyuki Akikusa.

The move comes as Sun struggles with its third major round of layoffs in three years and declining revenue, despite a growing server market. Sun's UltraSparc chips, one of several RISC (reduced instruction set computing) models on the market, have seen major competition from more mainstream Intel processors, such as Xeon.

The deal involves several chips and systems. Both companies will sell APL systems, which are based on Fujitsu's coming Sparc64 VI processors. And both companies will sell systems based on Sun's "Niagara" and "Rock" chips, models with a "throughput computing" design for running several processing tasks simultaneously.

Sun will design the low-end APL servers, and the companies will jointly design the high-end systems, said Brian Sutphin, Sun's vice president of business development, who hammered out the deal over the last year. Sun will design and build the Niagara- and Rock-based products.

When either company sells an APL system, both will get some fraction of the revenue, McNealy said in an interview.

The partnership could help Sun's current financial woes. In October, Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst at Bernstein Investment Research and Management, estimated that joint development of the Sparc processor could save Sun $200m (£108m) per year, and joint development of Sparc and servers could save $300m to $400m.

The joint work should increase server revenue in Sun's fiscal 2005, which begins on 1 July, McNealy said. The companies expect the Sparc market to grow because of joint work in research, marketing and software partnerships, he said.

The partnership does increase the potential for Sparc, said IDC analyst Jean Bozman. "It does create a bigger total available market for the architecture," she said.

Fujitsu for years has produced its own Sparc chip family, Sparc64, whose different hardware interface can't fit into Sun's servers without significant engineering work.

Sun cancelled development of its high-end UltraSparc V processor earlier this year, a move that wasn't related to the Fujitsu deal, said Marc Tremblay, Sun fellow and chief architect of the company's processors and network products. Instead, the problem with the UltraSparc V was simply that its design began too early and didn't represent what the market now needs, he said.

The APL processor will fill the UltraSparc V high-end niche, however. The "next-generation APL microprocessor... will bring new meaning to the term RISC mainframe," McNealy said.

Sun has been working for years to move high-end features found in IBM's expensive but powerful mainframe servers to its own Unix servers; IBM and Hewlett-Packard have a similar strategy. Fujitsu, which sold mainframes, has been building sophisticated features into its Sparc64 family, such as the ability to re-execute an instruction automatically if it fails.

Fujitsu will manufacture the APL chip, and Texas Instruments will manufacture the Rock and Niagara chips, said Andy Ingram, vice president of marketing for Sun's Network Storage Products Group.

The initial APL systems won't use Sun's proximity interconnect, technology under development that stacks chips on top of each other to permit direct communications that today are handled by slower wires on a circuit board. But that technology will be used, according to Tremblay. "I'm counting on it," he said.

The technology should arrive in 2007 or 2008, as long as Sun finds a way to make manufacturing affordable, Tremblay said. McNealy wouldn't share specific schedules for the Niagara- and Rock-based products, but Tremblay said the Rock models will arrive after the first APL systems.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

16 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

3 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

5 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

7 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

12 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

14 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

14 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

16 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

17 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

17 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

19 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

19 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

19 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

20 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions