ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Office applications Toolkit

Sender ID dealt killer blow

Stefanie Olsen CNET News.com

Published: 24 Sep 2004 09:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A Microsoft-backed proposal for verifying the source of email has been shelved by the Internet engineers working to turn it from specification to standard, in a final blow for anti-spam technology Sender ID.

Sender ID is a technology designed to foil spammers by authenticating an email sender's "@" address, such as "@yourbank.com," by checking its underlying, numeric Internet Protocol address. The system combines a previous proposal called Sender Policy Framework, or SPF -- authored by Meng Wong, chief technology officer at Pobox.com -- and Microsoft's follow-on "Caller ID for Email Technology".

On Wednesday, the technical standards body Internet Engineering Task Force, or IETF, announced that the working group charged with building consensus on the Sender ID proposal has "concluded".

"From the outset...the working group participants have had fundamental disagreements," according to the IETF announcement, referring to the working group formally known as the MTA Authorisation Records in DNS, or MARID. Therefore, MARID's co-chairs "concluded that [it] should be terminated."

Instead, the IETF has granted Sender ID "experimental" status so that the industry can test it, along with competing email authentification proposals, and build consensus that way.

Closing shop comes roughly a week after MARID voted down a proposal by Microsoft to make some of the company's intellectual property a mandatory part of the solution. The group decided that Microsoft's insistence on keeping secret a possible patent application on its proposed technology was unacceptable.

The use of Microsoft's technology in the combined specification meant the company could specify a licence that potential users would have to agree to before using the code.

America Online recently said it would not support Sender ID, citing poor industry support and compatibility issues with the anti-spam technology, SPF, that it supports. Open-source groups also pulled their support of Sender ID, claiming its licensing restrictions were too strict.

"In its current form, Sender ID is dead," said Yakov Shafranovich, former co-chair of the Anti-Spam Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force. "What's left is SPF and whatever Microsoft decides to promote. At this point, we're back to where we were six months ago."

SPF's Wong already said he plans to publish a "unified SPF" proposal that "captures everything we've learned so far". The unified proposal will require senders and receivers to publish for and check three major groups of identities, he said. Those include the host name, mail-from, and Purported Responsible Address, a technique that checks the record against the most recent sender of the email address.

"This is the best way forward. It offers the market a superset of all the other proposals," Wong said.

Microsoft could not be immediately reached for comment.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
69 out of 124 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

Telic Telic

MacLinux

Friday 10 October 2008, 10:34 PM

5 comments
1000215420 1000215420

Punishment & Deterrent

Friday 10 October 2008, 9:37 PM

4 comments
1000215420 1000215420

Punishment & Deterrent

Friday 10 October 2008, 9:36 PM

4 comments

Vista Upgrade Blog

Vista - Still Running and Stable After...

Six weeks ago, when I wrote Renewed Adventures with Vista, I wondered if Microsoft had finally managed to fix it sufficiently that I wouldn't be forced to give up on it after a few... More

Post a comment

Official MS Windows 7 Bloggers

Check this out: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7...spx Its an official blog "Engineering Windows 7" Nothing. That's what is revealed. Until there is real... More

5 comments

Microsoft's Mojave just a desert vista

It didn't seem fair to wade into Microsoft's “Mojave Experiment” advert quite so soon after the flat earth incident. But The Economist has no such qualms: in this week's issue, it wonders... More

6 comments