Microsoft wants larger piece of storage market

NEWS
Microsoft next month will launch new software and a time-tested strategy -- undercutting prices -- in an attempt to grab a larger share of the enterprise storage market.

The company's Storage Server 2003 software, designed to run as the operating system on network-attached storage (NAS) devices, is expected to debut next month.

NAS devices are dedicated computers that serve up files and data to computer users on a network. The systems tend to be used by smaller companies or work groups within large organisations, such as law firms or financial services companies, that frequently access data in the form of files.

Microsoft says the new software pumps up the performance of its existing NAS software and adds features such as a new data copying tool and support for clustering more NAS machines. Storage Server 2003 is based on the Windows Server 2003 operating system, retooled for use in dedicated file servers.

The software's debut will be a significant milestone for Microsoft's Enterprise Storage Division, launched in January 2002 and headed by veteran executive Bob Muglia. In the past year, the division has been busy cutting deals with new partners.

Microsoft has gained ground in the storage market during recent months. The market share for Windows in network-attached storage devices rose 8 percentage points earlier this year, to 41 percent.

So far, storage systems based on Windows have typically been used by smaller companies. Microsoft claims that the better performance of the new release opens the door to more critical storage operations at larger businesses.

"It's enterprise-ready," said Vanessa Lee, a Microsoft product manager.

Nancy Marrone-Hurley, an analyst with market research firm Enterprise Storage Group, agreed that Microsoft's upgrade puts the company in the higher-end playing field.

"Before, they didn't compete in this space," she said. "Now they can effectively go after it."

To tackle the high-end market, Microsoft will use a tactic honed in its successful battles for market share in database software, network operating systems and business applications: bundle lots of features and undercut competitors on price.

Look out, Network Appliance
Microsoft's largest rival in the higher-end NAS market is storage device-maker Network Appliance, said Bill North, an analyst with market research firm IDC. Network Appliance has "been 'the' show in town" in the high-end NAS market, North said, and it may find its business dented by Microsoft's newest software.

While spending on NAS machines declined last year to $1.54bn (£970m), IDC projects the NAS market will bounce back to $1.77bn this year and jump to $3.17bn in 2007.

Storage Server 2003 is part of Microsoft's effort to get in on the ground floor of that market, and it could help the company's other products, said Zane Adam, director of product management and marketing in Microsoft's Enterprise Storage Division. "Ultimately, storage is the core of all products. If you cannot get access to your data, you cannot do business."

Microsoft's licensing deals may allow manufacturers to undercut NAS devices from Network Appliance on price while adding an improved operating system, North said.

Microsoft NAS products are already cheaper than those from Network Appliance. Small businesses can buy a Dell PowerVault 725N NAS device running Windows with 1 terabyte of capacity for $4,098. By contrast, pricing for Network Appliance's FAS250 model with 1 terabyte of capacity begins at roughly $10,000, according to the company. A terabyte is approximately one trillion bytes.

IDC said that in the third quarter of 2002, Network Appliance NAS gear cost 2.9 cents per megabyte (MB), compared with 1.9 cents per MB for NAS equipment from Dell that uses Windows as the operating system. Microsoft's Adam said NAS equipment using the company's upgraded OS will continue to be priced lower than gear with similar capacity from Network Appliance.

The overall manufacturing costs for comparable machines made by Network Appliance and manufacturers using Windows Storage Server 2003 are likely to be similar, North said.

"The question is, would NetApp be willing to give up some of its operating margin to compete more effectively?" North said.

Eric Brown, a Network Appliance spokesman, conceded that Microsoft beats his company on NAS pricing. But he said that in other categories, such as overall performance, Network Appliance holds its own against Microsoft. In particular, Brown said Network Appliance NAS devices are a better choice for companies integrating Windows, Unix and Linux systems.

Microsoft says that with Storage Server 2003 it's working to bolster support for operating systems other than Windows.

Tools and speed
Microsoft has also added tools to the new release to make systems running its software more attractive to enterprise buyers. One new tool, called Volume Shadow Copy Services, allows customers to take a snapshot of their data for easier management. Microsoft says the tool is superior to other available snapshot products because it works with other applications to prepare them for the data copying process. That integration results in a better picture of the information, and therefore better retrieval of lost documents, the company claims.

Marrone-Hurley praised the new tool. "It makes sure of the integrity of the data," she said. "It's a pretty cool little feature."

Other changes focus on preventing outages -- a key requirement for storing critical business information. Microsoft Storage Server 2003 now supports redundant input-output data paths as well as the ability to set up clusters of up to eight NAS boxes to provide backup in case of a failure. The existing Windows operating systems for NAS allows only for a cluster of two machines.

Microsoft also said the new storage OS has increased the speed of serving up files. Microsoft's Adam says that in Windows-based networks, performance increases by more than 100 percent compared with the existing Windows OS for NAS. In Unix environments, the performance has jumped by at least 50 percent, Adam said.

Verifying the company's claims isn't easy. Microsoft hasn't published specific performance figures for Unix. That translates into a question mark for Marrone-Hurley. "We have to wait to see the performance numbers before we can say how they'll compete in that space," she said. "In the past, their performance hasn't been great in the Unix space."

Network Appliance is about to have a battle on its hands with Microsoft and its hardware partners looking for a greater share of the market, North said.

"Those are formidable players that would like to have a share of the market that NetApp has enjoyed," North said.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 hour ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

9 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

11 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

11 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

13 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

15 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

16 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

17 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

17 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

18 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

20 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint