The interview: Strategies for fielding common questions

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Builder.Com

As we all know, it's the interview that gets you the job. But for most of us, interviews are no walk in the park. Goofing up on an interview can not only cost you a job offer; in the worst-case scenario, it can also make you feel like a complete idiot. It's helpful to know what an interviewer is after when he or she asks you one of those "interview questions" so that you can be prepared with a good "interview answer." To help you with this interview preparedness, I sought the advice of career columnist Wade Mitchell, who's done more than his fair share of interviews. I asked him what goes through an interviewer's mind when asking common interview questions. Caution: Minefield ahead!
During an interview, you'll probably be asked quite a few questions about your character. Mitchell calls character questions "landmine questions", because "the interviewer just wants to see if you are dumb enough to step on them." These questions can take many forms. Here are some examples of landmine character questions:
  • "Tell me about two of your weaknesses."
  • "Name one thing you'd most like to improve about yourself."
  • "What do you hate most?"
  • "If you wore a sign about one aspect of your personality, what would it say?"
Obviously, you should avoid mentioning anything like tardiness and absenteeism that might reflect badly on your employability when answering questions like these. You knew that already, right? However, even small things like having a hard time with criticism or not being a morning person could be held against you and should be avoided as well. A good, time-honoured strategy for handling questions like these is to pick a positive character flaw, something like "I tend to be a perfectionist." If you do share something less flattering about yourself, Mitchell suggests that you immediately follow up with something you have learned from your weakness and explain how you address it. Above all, don't try to be entertaining with your answers. You never know what the interviewer might find offensive. "What is your reason for leaving your previous job?" is another question Mitchell labels as a landmine. He says that the interviewer asking any question like this is looking to discover two things about you:
  • How soon will you leave this job if we hire you?
  • How willing are you to air your employer's dirty laundry?
If the new job would constitute a step up the corporate ladder, you can say that here; ambition is good. Of course, you should handle any question about your former employer with care and never say anything negative about it, no matter how funny a story it makes. If you can't say anything nice, and you left because you simply couldn't stand another day there, Mitchell said the best answer is simply, "It was time to move on." Some of the landmine questions will appear to be non sequiturs. "What would you do if you won the lottery?" would be one example. According to Mitchell, that's about your dedication to your job. Is being a developer your passion? Would you leave if more money came along? Even if you would, it could be a bad idea to admit it. Finding out about you At some point, the interview will move to areas directly related to the job you are interested in, and you'll be asked questions about your skills and experience. Being asked to rate yourself on technical skills is fairly common, and the temptation to exaggerate to make a good impression can be strong. Don't do it. Nobody wins when candidates get a job they are not qualified for. Be honest instead and try to justify your rating so the interviewer can get a good idea of what you know. Oddly enough, the questions that Mitchell said he's seen a lot of developers trip over are the common ones that are asked during any interview. The most problematic ones go something like "Tell me about the nature of your work in your previous position," or "Tell me about a technical problem you had to solve and how you solved it." Mitchell said that you have to use these questions as opportunities to spell out to the interviewer why you think you're qualified for the offered job and distinguish yourself from the other 50 or so candidates on the interview schedule. Show off a bit and be prepared with your answer before the interview. An answer like "I built an app that's a lot like the one you have here. Having accessed your customer interface via the Web, I can already see some ways I could improve it, as I had the same issues at my old job. In fact, I got a commendation letter for my work," will get you much farther than "Well, I developed a database for banks to use...so...I think I can do the job." A similar invitation for you to sell yourself is a question like "Why are you interested in working here?" This is where you prove that you've done your homework -- and you did, didn't you? Show the interviewer that you know something about the organisation and relate that to your desire to work there. The questions themselves can tell you a lot Some questions can give you useful information about the culture of the organisation you are interviewing with. "How do you feel about ever-changing priorities and goals?" for example, tips you off that your responsibilities will often change. That can be a sign that the department is understaffed, that it's just very busy, or maybe even that it's a complete madhouse. Whatever the underlying reason, if you can't cope with that sort of situation, you should seriously reconsider your desire for the position. If the subject of money comes up during your first interview, it could be a bad sign. Perhaps the company is desperate to hire staff due to turnovers so it's accelerating the process -- which might mean that the working environment is bad. It could also be that the interviewer thinks you're under- or overqualified. At the very least, Mitchell warned, bringing up salary in the first interview is a protocol violation and should make you cautious. A number of other questions are inappropriate and should not be asked during an interview. For instance:
  • "Do you have any children?"
  • "Tell me about your family background."
  • "Are you married?"
Such questions should set off definite alarm bells for you, Mitchell said. If you are asked one of these questions, he suggested that you say you would rather discuss your professional qualifications and leave it at that. Created by developers, for developers, Builder.com brings software developers fresh, real-world perspective on topics from programming to architecture to management. Builder.com will improve the way developers work with the information, tools, and services to help them conquer the challenges they face everyday in real-world development.
For all job and work-related news, or to search for a job and get information on training, go to ZDNet Jobs. If you have something to say about work and employment issues say it here at the Jobs Forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

2 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

5 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

19 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint