Debunking hiring myths

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
TechRepublic

As a technical recruiter, I'm all too familiar with how uncertain employment has become for many IT workers. Every day, loyal clients tell me that they aren't hiring at all, or that they're hiring but are unable to work with recruiters. Whether you're sending out CVs or calling on clients, repeatedly having people tell you that they don't need your services can be painful and demoralising. With IT jobs difficult to come by, some people find themselves struggling to make ends meet and piling up huge debts as they try to weather the storm. For those of you in circumstances like these, I'd like to clarify some assumptions about hiring in the hope that those who feel that the world has turned against them will be able to set those fears aside and focus on more relevant issues in their search for work. Myth #1: Employers don't value IT professionals
This is no truer now than it was four years ago when we were experiencing an economic boom. What has changed is that the demand for people with your skills has dropped dramatically and the supply has remained constant or even increased. Just like when you buy a car, every hiring manager wants to get the absolutely best buy he or she can for the money. Who wouldn't buy a Lexus for the price of a used Yugo? Balancing the desire to keep salaries down is the need to keep salaries high enough to discourage talented people from leaving and working for the competition. So equilibrium is found. Companies that don't pay their people enough lose all their best and brightest people, and eventually die a long, slow death. Companies that pay their people too much are at a competitive disadvantage when pricing their products, and eventually must correct their actions or go out of business. One company, for example, was known among recruiters to pay whatever it took to get the people it wanted in the door. This was one of several factors that led to massive layoffs and the failure of the company. Myth #2: You are entitled to a certain pay rate
Nobody is entitled to anything. If people got paid what they really deserved, social workers and prison guards would be making considerably more than they do. We all must strike the best deals we can with our employers and live within our means. If circumstances change, we also must adjust our expectations. Take, for example, the COBOL programmers who were so highly paid in 1999. How much do you think they're being paid now, if they can even find work? Those people didn't become less valuable in 2001. The demand for their skills just declined dramatically. Myth #3: An HR manager or recruiter decides who gets hired
The fact is that HR managers and recruiters generally don't even decide who gets interviewed. This is especially true for skilled positions. They may offer some input into the hiring process, and will hold a manager's feet to the fire to make sure that no discrimination is going on and that the offers are in line with the company's pay scales, but they don't make the hiring decisions. However, HR managers often are the first ones to screen the CVs on behalf of the hiring manager, reducing the number of CVs from 100 to maybe 20 to 30 for the manager to review. This fact alone makes it extremely important for you to be as clear as possible when developing your CV, and makes it imperative that you create a document that not only communicates your skills, but also looks good. This also means that if you're applying for a specific position, you should craft a CV specifically for that job. It certainly doesn't hurt to attach a cover letter or explain in the e-mail exactly why it is that you're qualified for the position. Remember that your first point of contact (the recruiter) may not be exceptionally technical, so it helps to spell things out. A summary of your technical skills (preferably near the top of the page) is a must. Don't expect the recruiter to read between the lines. If you have created an online CV, consider including a keyword section at the bottom, which includes every word imaginable that might describe you. You never know what words the recruiter might be using to narrow the field of candidates. Remember, an HR department is likely just as understaffed as every other department, so a recruiter probably isn't going to have a lot of time to spend on difficult-to-read CVs. With applicants in plentiful supply, they'll just pass those over and move on. Myth #4: Managers should hire as many people as they think they need
Here's the reality: Companies that survive and flourish do so because they have good financial officers who keep them out of the red. It's the chief financial officer, not the vice president of human resources, who ultimately decides what a department's budget is, and therefore how many people it will be able to hire. The current economic climate has made chief financial officer hesitant to allow large capital projects when it isn't certain that there will be sufficient funds in the near future to help pay for them. Also, companies are almost universally experiencing long hiring freezes, and often aren't being allowed to replace departing staff. The result is that the "lucky" ones who have jobs are asked to do more with less help. Finally, the good news
The good news is that our economy runs on the backs of information systems. While some IT projects can be put off indefinitely, many can't. Eventually the pent-up demand will force the approval of some projects, which should create more jobs, and once we see the economy returning to a healthy state, chief financial officers will become less anxious and start approving increased headcounts again. Believe it or not, the system that you all loved a few years ago when demand was providing you with what some considered unjustifiably high salaries is the same one we have today. In many ways, there is a lot of injustice in our present system: We have hard-working people who have to work two jobs just to keep food on the table. We have folks who can't afford to take their sick kids to the doctor because their companies don't provide health insurance, or the premiums are too high. The list goes on and on. Still, I think that overall, even considering present circumstances, we don't have it so bad. I hope that the majority of you see things the same way. TechRepublic is the online community and information resource for all IT professionals, from support staff to executives. We offer in-depth technical articles written for IT professionals by IT professionals. In addition to articles on everything from Windows to email to fire walls, we offer IT industry analysis, downloads, management tips, discussion forums, and e-newsletters.

For all job and work-related news, or to search for a job and get information on training, go to ZDNet Jobs. If you have something to say about work and employment issues say it here at the Jobs Forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

1 hour ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

4 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

7 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

12 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

21 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint