Oracle gains control of PeopleSoft

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Oracle announced late on Tuesday that 75 percent of PeopleSoft investors have tendered their shares, giving it a controlling stake in the company but falling short of the level needed for a speedy close to the deal.

As a result, Oracle has extended the tender deadline to 5 p.m. (PST) on 4 January, 2005, at which time it hopes to receive 90 percent or more of PeopleSoft shares -- thus avoiding the need to hold a special shareholder vote on the merger, which could delay the deal's close by four to six weeks. Although the $10.3bn mega-deal may face a delay in its closing by roughly a month, the deal will ultimately pass given that Oracle holds a majority stake in PeopleSoft and has four representatives to PeopleSoft's board of directors who took effect on Tuesday night.

"We are quite confident we'll have the 90 percent needed by the 4 January deadline. Some large shareholders wanted to wait until the first of the year to defer tax consequences," an Oracle spokesman said.

Oracle, which had set a Tuesday deadline for PeopleSoft investors to tender their shares when it announced its $10.3bn cash merger agreement with PeopleSoft earlier this month, also announced four representatives to PeopleSoft's board. They will replace four PeopleSoft directors who resigned on Tuesday night, following the initial tender deadline. Two PeopleSoft directors, however, will continue to serve on the board until the merger is completed.

PeopleSoft founder and CEO Dave Duffield, however, chose not to wait until the results of the initial tender offer were known before he resigned. Duffield resigned as chief executive and chairman on 21 December. Neither PeopleSoft nor Oracle would comment on Duffield's departure.

Meanwhile, PeopleSoft investors will have to formally vote on the merger if fewer than 90 percent of the outstanding PeopleSoft shares are tendered by 4 January, 2005, proxy solicitors said.

Oracle's spokesman noted that if 90 percent of the shares are not tendered by the January deadline, the deal's close would be pushed out by four to six weeks. Oracle had previous said it expected the deal to close sometime in January.

Oracle, as part of its $10.3bn cash offer, will pay investors $26.50 per share, as part of the merger deal. Once Oracle receives shareholder approval, it will bring to a close the 18-month, contentious, hostile takeover battle, which only recently became a friendly deal.

Just last month, more than 60 percent of PeopleSoft investors tendered their shares in support of the deal, but PeopleSoft's board reiterated its rejection of Oracle's $24 a share bid.

As a result, Oracle was not able to take possession of the shares without triggering PeopleSoft's anti-takeover measures, otherwise known as a poison pill. Once Oracle raised its offer to $26.50 a share, the transaction turned friendly and prompted PeopleSoft's board to waive the poison pill.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

10 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

13 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

15 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

20 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint