ANALYSIS Now HP has decided to part ways with chief executive Carly Fiorina what does the future hold for a company that has been struggling to find itself ever since its acquisition of Compaq in 2002? Although the merged company has managed to cut costs by combining operations, it has lost market share in certain areas.
Some industry experts have criticised HP for being too large and unwieldy and have argued that the company's future success depends on splitting its constituent business units or at least cleaving the company into two halves; one to serve business customers and another focused on consumers.
"The question is whether HP needs new direction, or just a new driver. We think it needs a new direction. Our view is that HP has a broad portfolio whose separate parts don't work well enough together. Fixing that will require changes to strategy, not just execution," says Douglas Hayward, senior analyst for industry researcher Ovum.
Hayward adds that many HP divisions are not as profitable as more focused best-of-breed companies. "While HP undoubtedly has good products and services, Fiorina failed to combine the hardware, software and services businesses so that they performed better than if they were spun off. That's ironic for a CEO who arrived from Lucent, itself a spin-off," he says.
If HP does opt to lighten its load, the consensus amongst experts is that the PC division is the stand-out candidate for being first to go. Speaking in London on Tuesday morning at the Regent Conference for senior IT professionals, Mike Norris, chief executive of UK reseller Computacenter said that HP should follow IBM's lead and sell its PC business as soon as possible.
"IBM selling PC was an inspired move. I wouldn't like to predict that HP are going to do the same but it wouldn't surprise me," he said.
Norris argued that the ability to make money from PC assembly has gone and HP should follow IBM into concentrating on supplying chips and other commodity items.
"I have asked HP 'What is the value you add to an Intel processor and an MS operating system?' they rack their brains and say nothing," he said
Ovum's Hayward claims the crux of the problem is that HP has failed when it comes to cross-selling between its services and product lines.
"HP must either create these virtuous connections, or get rid of the bits that don't help to drive revenue and profit growth. We suggest it starts right now with the PC business," he says.
HP still seeks competitive edge
Analysts says Hewlett-Packard is merely back where it was before buying Compaq and lacks evidence of consistent growth
Fiorina clarifies 'Adaptive Enterprise' strategy
Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina tries to clear up the confusion over her company's new 'Adaptive Enterprise' computing strategy and explains how it fits into the information technology landscape
Pinpointing HP's centre of gravity
What truth lurks among the binary oppositions of marketing, where competitors are bad and HP's products ideal for all?
Carly Fiorina on the post-merger 'HP Way'
The Hewlett-Packard chief executive on how her company plans to take on Dell, and whether innovation in IT really is dead
Talkback
I couldn't agree more with that adage.
14 Feb 05 14:30 ReplyWe had a HP engineer who lacked direction, he couldn't even find the building where the printer he was supposed to repair, was located!
In the report log he had the cheek to put unable to contact client!
To be honest, HP's biggest mistake was spinning off its test equipment business a number of years ago. If you go back just 15 years, this was a core part of the business in manufacturing test equipment for industry. Along came the dot com boom, the test equipment business became Agilent Technologies, and HP bought Ditigal and later Compaq.
17 Feb 05 19:27 ReplyThe problem is now that the IT business is about desktop computers at the lowest possible cost. They cannot hope to compete with Dell as well as try to compete with IBM and Sun in Enterprise computing. IBM really gave up desktop after O/S2, and have managed to reinvent their core business, they even make microprocessors for other vendors (and probably make decent profit it). HP don't even make decent destop printers anymore, especially when compared to the competition.
Had it kept hold of Agilent (the world's largest manufacturer of oscilloscopes and general test equipment), at things would have been very different and they would be able to engineer themselves out of of their current situation.