Keeping systems threats in check

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

COMMENT

Every so often, I like to review a system that has been proposed to classify disasters and potential responses. While nearly everyone involved in disaster recovery (DR) planning has some idea of the types of disasters that could strike, few have concrete ideas on how to apply those concepts to DR planning itself. Later columns will deal with these levels and how to address them in more detail. For now, this is my proposal for a more formal classification plan for disasters, based loosely on a British military classification system for threat levels in battle situations.

Level 1 — Threat of disaster without evidence
Essentially, this level encompasses everything that doesn't do damage to your data systems, and also doesn't offer any proof of attack, but could be a publicity or regulatory nightmare. Common examples are posted boasts about incursions into your network on blogs and Web forums, or claims that proprietary data was compromised even though no evidence is offered. The major issue with these kinds of disasters is that you can't prove or disprove them in many cases. Even if you have advanced security measures in place, employee collusion can easily overcome those measures without showing any weakness in the digital security itself. Since this level of threat doesn't have any evidence associated with it, dealing with the bad publicity can be just as devastating to your organisation as data loss.

Level 2 — Actual attack without data loss
Once an attacker has breached your security digitally, and has evidence of his or her attack, your IT staff will need to be able to show what happened and how. In these cases, there is clear proof of the attack, but not of the extent of the attack. How far did they get into your network, what did they see, what did they take? Just because they didn't destroy anything, doesn't mean you can call this anything but a disaster.

Level 3 — Minor data/system loss
Entering the level that most people consider disasters, this is where data systems and data itself are lost to natural causes, attacks, or system failures. Level 3 deals mostly with smaller-scale issues: The loss of non-critical systems, or a single critical system that can be restored quickly. The key difference between this level and those that follow is that here we see disasters that have a high priority, but not a high urgency. Your Recovery Time Objective is probably at least one business day, giving you time to react and correct.

Level 4 — Major data/system loss
At this level, larger-scale disasters strike. Here is where multiple critical systems fail at the same time, possibly due to power loss or fire/flood in the data centre. While you can correct for these issues, it will require an immediate response from your staff, moving quickly to get business-critical systems back up and running. Systems that have a Recovery Time Objective of less than one business day fall into this category when they fail.

Level 5 — Total Loss
The highest level in the system, this classification is only invoked in cases where there is a massive disruption in services due to disaster. Hurricanes, large-scale floods and fires, and building loss are usually found here, with a twin disaster of loss of data systems and the physical plant to recover to. Due to considerations such as loss of space, loss of life, and psychological impact, recovery is an exceptionally difficult—though necessary—task.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

7 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

10 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

12 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

17 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint