Without diversity in security software for Windows, computers running the Microsoft operating system will be sitting ducks, Symantec chief executive John Thompson warns.
Ever since Microsoft in 2003 announced it would offer antivirus products, Thompson has been asked how Symantec will respond. Microsoft is going after consumers with its Windows OneCare Live security package, scheduled for US release next month, and is targeting businesses with its Microsoft Client Protection suite, expected by year's end.
Symantec will beat Microsoft by building better products and taking advantage of its security reputation, Thompson has said repeatedly. On Wednesday, while speaking at a Gartner event, he added that mass adoption of Microsoft's security tools could have an adverse affect on security.
"If all of a sudden the whole world uses the monoculture of Microsoft and the monoculture of Microsoft security capability, I am not sure we would create a more secure world," Thompson said. "Diversity in the security platforms supplied on top (of Windows), we think is of great value in protecting that infrastructure."
After his talk at the Gartner event, Thompson sat down with ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com to discuss Microsoft, Symantec's integration of Veritas Software and move to a more enterprise-focused vendor, as well as the future of Symantec and Thompson's own role at the company.
Q: You've said that Microsoft should make its products more secure, but that it would be dangerous if the world relied on Microsoft's upcoming security software. Would it become a major target?
Thompson: Look at what's happened in the Windows world. Hackers have decided that there is a very large, target-rich environment here. If all of a sudden now the infrastructure that is being attacked also becomes the common infrastructure for securing the environment and the attackers decide to attack that too, what does that say for computer users around the world who have embraced this monoculture?
I would argue the world is safer when you have diversity, not when you have a monoculture that is common that when one exploit is delivered, it can literally wipe out millions of machines around the world. Hence, we believe the world is safer with us and other security vendors adding capability on top of the Windows platform.
People always ask how you will counter Microsoft's upcoming entry into the security space. You've said that you'll beat them with your reputation and innovation. How are you going to out-innovate a company that has over $6bn (£3bn) in R&D spending, more than your annual revenue?
Microsoft spends its $6bn on a wide array of things. They have a large R&D budget; it is spread very thin across a lot of initiatives. I would be willing to bet that the amount of money they spend on security is not nearly as significant as what we spend, because we're much more focused.
Another part of Microsoft's muscle, besides its R&D budget, is its marketing engine. It has got a big marketing budget and is going to go out there and market its new security offerings. How are you going to respond to that?
When Microsoft does enter the market and has their aggressive marketing campaign, the whole world will benefit from that. It will start to create a level of awareness that, quite frankly, must occur.
We protect more people from more online threats than anyone else in the world, bar none. So there is a reputation value that we will certainly trade on as we think about our marketing activities and marketing campaigns over the course of the next year or so.
Do you feel you have to ramp up your marketing?
Certainly, there is no question about that. You can't have Microsoft essentially take all of the oxygen out of the air with their marketing campaign. So we have to have our own point of view that we bring to the market that stresses the history and longevity of Symantec in this space and leverages the more than 50 million users of our security products, leverages the fact that we have shipped more than 200 million copies of our antivirus product around the world.
There are wonderful statements that we can make about not only our pre-existing...





Talkback
Right. Best advise given before and given again. Symantec and others are well advised to drop support for Microsoft platforms now and let Microsoft alone worry about the after effects of that and concentrate on Microsoft alternatives from now on. To bring back to memory, several years ago plenty of people warned various third-party vendors that by dropping up front support for anything then a Microsoft platform would make them vulnerable of being set aside a few years down the road. Today it seems that that is starting to become a reality. And, as has been predicted back then, the third-party vendors involved ignore the facts right in front of them once again. They've been used to kill former competitors and now the same faith awaits them. Gee, that no-one thought of that before. Sigh.
Good luck to them but I doubt if it'll make a difference. Following the leader blindly only will leave you with the left over scraps to survive on until the leader finds a new young dog naieve enough to do blindly what he's been told. Thank you for your services while they served us. Now be a good boy and turn over and die. We no longer have any use for you.
The ignorant dog however thinks that he knows best. OK, he made the mistake of using his strength while he should have been using his brains back then. But now the old but still naieve dog thinks that the best action to take is to use its brains rather then it strenght. Sigh and sigh once more. Completely wrong back then and completely wrong now. They've got it all reversed. Time to roll over and die and get it over with. Well deserved I should add. For being such an ignorant fool back then. And being a fool now.
If the MS version doesn't kick me out of a full screen online game just to ask me if I want to run updates, then I'll use it.
Sure I could turn off auto update, or have it download (potentially bad updates) without asking, but neither of those appeal to me.
Having it kick me out of fullscreen (especially memory hogging apps that takek forever to swap out of) just to ask about an update really bugs me. Sit popped up in the back ground and wait for my game to end ffs.
P2P this is true if using Symantech's trash can patch like I did. The Home base machine I have came equipt with 3mo. and an extention of ten months for the asking online price(?) I think it was twenty dollars cheaper than the electronics store I buy my candy from. I almost got arrested by some black lady when trying to return a movie for store credit. Now the only thing I could possibly walk out with would be a multi-user pack of Windows XP Professional or this Norton Enterprise Virus Protection.