Why organisations fail at project management

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

Generally speaking, all companies and organisations are trying to get better at project management. (In other words, there aren't any organisations that are purposely trying to get worse at project management.) Though they may not be able to articulate it, organisations recognise that there is value associated with being able to manage projects more effectively.

Why then, are so many organisations still so bad at project management? What is keeping most organisations from being able to effectively manage projects? Having pondered this on many consulting and training engagements, I have ranked my top five reasons below. See if you can pick out the reasons why your organisation falls short in implementing good project-management discipline.

5. Senior managers think project management is a software tool
When you discuss project management with some managers, they think initially that you are trying to implement a tool that allows you to be a better project manager. In fact, if it was a tool, you might have more luck convincing them to do it. Even though some aspects of project management, such as the creation and management of the workplan, may utilise a tool, that is not where the value of project management lies. Instead, project management is about skills and discipline. It's about applying proactive processes and best practices. It's about using common and understood templates. Don’t get me wrong — tools have their place. However, software tools are not the answer.

4. Organisations don’t value the upfront investment of time
Many people consider themselves to be "doers", and organisations can also be that way. If you're going to be good at project management, you have to understand that the upfront planning process has value. You need to know that if you plan the project well (in other words, if you know what you're doing before you start), you'll be able to manage the work more effectively. I have seen organisations say they want to apply good project management, but then are unwilling to invest the time required. No-one wants to take the time to plan. Instead, everyone wants to start executing immediately and then redo all the work later to get it right.

3. You may have been burned in the past
A common criticism of project-management methodology is that it is cumbersome, paper intensive, and takes too much focus away from the work at hand. Sometimes this is a legitimate concern, caused by not scaling the methodology appropriately to the size of your project. However, project management was not the problem. The problem was a misguided attempt at implementation of project management. If you implement project-management methodology correctly, the results will be outstanding.

2. Your organisation is not committed
Many organisations say they want good project management, but do the actions back up the words? For instance, the first time you try to define the work, does everyone say "just get on with it"? If you try to enforce scope change management, does your manager say "just do the work"? Does your sponsor say you are wasting time identifying risks? This disconnection is very common. The words say one thing but the actions say another.

1. Organisations don't know how to implement culture change
Most organisations don’t know how to manage culture change in general, and project management in particular. You can’t just train people and turn them loose. You can’t just buy MS Project and turn people loose. You have to have a long-term, multi-faceted approach to managing culture change. It takes hard work and resources. Most organisations aren’t committed to focusing on the culture change in the long-term, and they don’t want to spend any resources to do it. Is it any wonder then that six months later, project-management deployment ends up in the rubbish pile of culture-change initiatives that have all failed in the past?

Talkback

I couldn't agree more! Usually the purchase of the required Software should already reflect the change in culture and processes envisioned by the commitment to a better project management. That means that an orderly project that involves a clear picture of the companie's strategy needs to be finalized before the real work begins. This requires a lot of buy in on all levels.
Additionally I have often seen management try to let PMs compete for ressources budget, time, and success. Prioritisation and planning for ressources on the company level often leads to the unproductive friction between competing projects.
Last but not least, PMs mostly operate on a vertical level without significant formal authority. While I agree that that is almost unavoidable in many cases, the change process in the company should include a reward and reporting system that includes PMs.

via Facebook 10 July, 2006 23:16
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

4 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

7 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

9 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

14 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

23 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint