When Zalmai Azmi took on the job of FBI chief information officer three years ago, he had a daunting task ahead of him: steering the agency's rocky computer modernisation project back on course.
The results so far have been mixed. Last year, the FBI was forced to abandon its initial plans to create a so-called Virtual Case File system, with FBI Director Robert Mueller admitting to Congress that more than $100m had been wasted. In addition, a series of damning reports have described slipshod management and missing equipment.
Now, however, the FBI is trying again with a project named Sentinel that's designed to succeed a paper-intensive system that relies on 1980s mainframe technology. In March, the FBI awarded Lockheed Martin the contract for Sentinel's development, which is estimated at $305m over six years.
Azmi, an Afghan native, came to the FBI from the Executive Office of the US Attorneys, where he was responsible for developing and carrying out a multi-year IT transformation plan.
ZDNet UK's sister site, CNET News.com, spoke with Azmi about Sentinel's direction, the existing cumbersome systems and recent reports that a contractor hacked the FBI's computers.
Q: The FBI spent over $100m on a system that ultimately had to be abandoned. Earlier this year, government auditors faulted the bureau for wasting millions of dollars on "questionable contractor costs" and misplaced equipment from earlier stages of the upgrade process. How can you be sure that taxpayer money won't go to waste again?
A: The GAO audit was specific to the Trilogy program and not specifically to the Virtual Case File. Sentinel is more akin to VCF than it was (to) Trilogy because Trilogy was the deployment of our network, desktops, laptops, scanners, printers, a lot of moving parts and a lot of computers. Sentinel is different. It's not going to supply any desktops or laptops or anything like that, it's more of an application we will make available to our users through Web technology or through a Web browser.
Regardless of that, a lot has changed since the Virtual Case File program was envisioned.
Now we have an enterprise architecture in place... We have the governance process to do that project from cradle to grave. As we go through that process, there are specific control gates and reviews and a proof of project to move to the next step. We have an investment-management board in place... to make sure we're investing in technologies that the bureau needs, technologies that our vision needs, and technologies that are budgeted for and envisioned for in enhancing the FBI's future mission.
We do have a very strict certification and accreditation policy or program in place for security — every program has to go through what we call a 'C&A' process. We also have a 'Life Cycle Management' directive in place, which means every program has to be developed according to a set of standards within the bureau, and those standards are reviewed and monitored through the governance process to make sure our contractors and our vendors are following the policies and methodologies that we have put in place.
From the perspective of agents and analysts doing their day-to-day work, how urgent is it that the FBI modernises its case-management system? If the system itself dates back to the 1980s, why weren't upgrades started sooner?
Information technology has to be revamped on a regular basis. Within the government, the best practices, every three to four years we have to replace our computers, and every five or maybe six years our servers. So there's a refresh cycle for the technology because it's constantly changing. With our current mission of national security and cyber-security, it is imperative for us to have the latest and greatest tools within the bureau. And that's why there's a sense of urgency; we need to have those critical tools at the disposal of our agents and analysts to do their job, and that urgency will remain. We're looking at new technologies every single year to enhance our mission.
The FBI's case-management system seems to be keyboard-based and paper-intensive, slowing down the process of accessing records. What are some of the complaints that FBI users have made about the way the case-management system works, and how would the new system address those concerns?
The existing automated case system that we have, which is called ACS, is a mainframe application, what we call a green screen, because it's command driven. You have to put commands in there, you have to do everything manually. It is true we don't have any mouse interaction with that version of automated case system. It is not taking advantage of modern technology. For example, it's probably going to take…
