The chair of the Commons Health Select Committee has criticised the doctors campaigning against the development of the NHS electronic patient record system.
Kevin Barron told a Westminster Hall debate on the subject he thought it sad that some health professionals are actively campaigning against the record being introduced.
"On one website that I looked at this week, a practice is getting people to opt out, saying that the records will be sold to pharmaceutical and insurance companies, and that the government will profit from them," Barron said.
"That is palpable nonsense, but it is being propagated by medical professionals in this country," he added, going on to describe a press release from the British Medical Association on the subject as "scaremongering", and saying that he worried about the BMA's leadership, given its opposition to a central database of summary patient records.
He referred to a briefing document from the BMA, which mentioned a lost disc of records on 160,000 patients from City and Hackney Primary Care Trust, but did not say that it was encrypted. Health minister Ben Bradshaw added: "The disc was found. Of course, that was not reported."
Read this
Feature: The top 10 IT disasters of all time
From faulty satellites nearly causing World War III to the Millennium Bug, poorly executed IT has had a lot to answer for over the years...
Barron added: "I am not a clinician, but one could well argue that not having a central database could be a matter of life or death. If I am on holiday in Torquay and keel over in the road because of a long-term condition, it may not immediately be obvious what the problem is."
He said that other such systems, such as that run by the US Veterans' Association, had shown their worth elsewhere. "When there were the disastrous problems caused by the hurricane in New Orleans and all the local systems were shut down, the healthcare of the veterans who got out could continue because of that database. It worked well, and those people's needs were not lost," he said.
Although generally supportive of the government, Barron said the committee had recommended that only patients could open the sealed envelope within records, except when there is a legal requirement otherwise, and was keen to see action including prosecutions taken against health-service staff who leak patient data.
Talkback
[[[ Kevin Barron told a Westminster Hall debate on the subject he thought it sad that some health professionals are actively campaigning against the record being introduced. ]]]
I agree with Mr Barron, but probably not for the same reasons. I think it is sad that the Dept for Health have barged on with this scheme without proper consultation, on a politically inspired suicidal timetable and have resorted to secret reports and gagging orders to prevent people from knowing quite how badly it is going ...... and that therefore the more ethical of our GPs have decided to prevent their patients from being harmed.
Mr Barron seems to be sad that the GPs have not "Held the Line" and displayed loyalty to the government; deciding instead to side with their patients instead .. scandalous.
[[[ saying that the records will be sold to pharmaceutical and insurance companies, and that the government will profit from them [...] That is palpable nonsense, but it is being propagated by medical professionals in this country," ]]]
But the government's own sites say that the centralised records *will* be made available to pharmaceutical and insurance companies and the government *will* be paid for this access, don't they? Given that this is the case, what part of this is "palpable nonsense"?
[[[ If I am on holiday in Torquay and keel over in the road because of a long-term condition, it may not immediately be obvious what the problem is. ]]]
Wow, that's an old one, but then I guess that the MPs he is addressing aren't too well up on this subject. The simple rebuttal to this is "How is it done today?". If I had a long term condition that might cause me to keel over in the road, I would be wearing a dog tag with relevant details and the emergency contact for my GP. I would most *definitely* trust amy life to a dog tag round my neck over a government run database *every* time.
Oh and I love the hurricane argument. I would hope that my GP and every other responsible GP will have an encrypted off site backup of my data.
Should I rehash the arguments against this expensive, unnecessary, dangerous white elephant? Naah. The rest of us, apart from this chap, have heard them 1000 times.