Google wants to help the European Commission prove antitrust charges against Microsoft related to the software giant's dominance of the web-browser market.
The web search giant, which recently released its Chrome web browser, announced on Tuesday that it is applying to be a "third party" in the European proceedings, which will entitle it to receive access to confidential documents in the case and the ability to voice objections.
Sundar Pichai, a Google vice president for product management, explained the company's reasoning in a company blog: "Google believes that the browser market is still largely uncompetitive, which holds back innovation for users. This is because Internet Explorer is tied to Microsoft's dominant computer operating system, giving it an unfair advantage over other browsers", he wrote.
Pichai compared that desktop-market situation with the mobile market, where IE is not tied to the dominant operating system. "[Microsoft's] browser therefore has a much lower usage. The value of competition for users [even in the limited form we see today] is clear: tabbed browsing, faster downloads, private browsing features and more," he wrote.
The request follows the Commission's recent decision to grant third-party access to Mozilla, the organisation behind the popular Firefox browser. Mitchell Baker, Mozilla's chair, voiced concerns similar to Google's — that tying IE to the Windows operating system harms competition for web browsers and reduces consumer choice.
The Commission formally put Microsoft on notice in mid-January, objecting to the bundling of the Internet Explorer browser with the Windows operating system. The Commission's decision, which initially stemmed from a complaint filed by rival browser-maker Opera, gave Microsoft two months to respond to the allegations, and also opened the case up to third-party involvement.
Read this
Why a Firefox fan became a Chrome convert
Stephen Shankland explains how Chrome lured him away from Firefox, despite the shortcomings of Google's browser
Microsoft's share of the browser market has been declining steadily during the past year, largely due to Firefox's growing popularity. In January, IE controlled 67.55 percent of global browser market share, a drop of more than seven percentage points in a year, according to web metrics company Net Applications. Meanwhile, Firefox gained more than three percentage points to 21.53 percent.
Apple's Safari rounds out the top three with 8.29 percent of the browser market. Google's Chrome browser, launched in September 2008, has 1.12 percent of the market, having overtaken Opera in November. Opera's share of the market now stands at 0.7 percent.
This is not the first time Google and Microsoft have locked horns on antitrust issues. In 2006, the search giant expressed concern over Microsoft embedding web-search functionality into its Vista operating system. Microsoft ultimately agreed to make changes to the desktop search feature to head off a further antitrust battle with US regulators.
Google also opposed Microsoft's failed bid to acquire Yahoo, saying it raised "troubling questions".
Microsoft recently opposed Google's proposed ad-sharing deal with Yahoo, which Google ultimately abandoned in the face of antitrust scrutiny.
Talkback
Microsoft gave the computer world the first real joined up operating system which has developed into the behemoth we now use to run on our computers. But a browser was also introduced by MS to enable their Windows users to access the internet and logically and obviously Internet Explorer, although in reality no more than an add on, became an integral part of the Windows product.
Only in recent years with increased computer literacy and the appearance of alternative browsers and the robust interference from Brussels has there been procedural complaints.
I submit that MS has acted properly and correctly in including a web browser with their operating systems. The only possible faulting could be that it became the default browser due to consumers not wanting nor bothering to find and install another. Good customer service in my book!!!
If producers of other browsers want to have their product installed on computers then let them pay the PC vendors to install it when the PC is constructed.