Not to rest on its many laurels, the Mozilla Organization is hard at work on its next browser release, code-named Gran Paradiso. While an Alpha version of Firefox 3 (Gran Paradiso) Alpha 1 is available for download, this release is not meant for public consumption, only for testing. Add-ons for Firefox 2 may not work in this test release. For end users, Firefox 2 remains the latest public version. The final public release of Firefox 3 is not expected until the autumn of 2007.
What's exciting about Gran Paradiso is its new layout engine. The Gekko 1.9 rendering engine will introduce some changes. For example, Firefox 3 will no longer support Windows 95, 98 and ME, and for Mac OS X, versions 10.2 and earlier will not longer be supported. There will also be numerous changes made to the Document Object Model (DOM) in Gekko 1.9, which will affect developers more than end users. Also, there will be changes in the way Firefox paints frames within its display and the way object tags are handled, as well as changes in event threading.
Also new are its advanced graphics rendering capabilities. Firefox 3 uses open-source vector graphics (code-named Cairo, and formerly known as Xr) to provide high-quality display and print rendering. Currently Cairo supports output produced by X Windows, OpenGL, Quartz, Win32, in-memory image buffers, PNG images, PostScript and PDF files. Cairo attempts to reproduce identical images on all output media (paper, disc drives and such) and uses hardware acceleration where possible to improve images on display screens.
Mac OS X users will also have the ability to create Cocoa Widgets for their desktops. Cocoa Widgets will replace Carbon Widgets on all Mozilla products beginning with Firefox 3.
Talkback
GEKKO is a SEARCH engine? DOMINANT Object Model? Cairo ... USE hardware acceleration? I thought GECKO was a LAYOUTengine, the DOM is the DOCUMENT Object Model, and I'm pretty sure Cairo USES hardware acceleration. I'm not trying to be smug or clever, but just letting you know I'm far less likely to have faith in any of your articles if you let sloppy mistakes like this through. I'm off to VNUNet and The Register!
Yes, I'll second that.
Someone ought to have checked the article a little more carefully (does ZDNet have staff editors?).
Wikipedia has some info: [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox#Version_3.0">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox#Version_3.0</a>], plus there is, of course, the mozilla developer center devnews article about alpha 2: [<a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2007/02/07/136/">http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2007/02/07/136/</a>]
The CSS changes are going to be interesting...
A couple of errors slipped through the net there. Apologies. Corrections now made.