Setup
Breezing through the options, our fastest installation of Microsoft Office Standard 2007 took no more than 20 minutes on a Windows XP computer. However, settle into your chair if you're curious about the fine print. We spent 40 minutes just skimming the 10,379-word End User License Agreement and stopped before we could understand it all. Here are some of the highlights: You're allowed to install Office 2007 software on two computers; you must agree to download updates whenever Microsoft decides you need them; and Microsoft may verify your licence key at any time to make sure that you're not using pirated software. It would be helpful if Microsoft better explained the Internet-based services that Office 2007 can connect to.
When we chose to Customize the installation on another PC, the process was more involved. It's too bad that while this process lets you handpick which items to install, it doesn't explain what you'll miss if you reject, say, Office Tools. And although Microsoft displays your available hard drive space, as well as how much of that is needed by your selected set of applications, there's no indication of the size of each individual application and you're left to your subtraction skills here. In the end, we installed everything available.
From that point on, loading the Office suite onto the hard drive took 15 minutes flat. Office Standard 2007 is smaller than its predecessors, at about 3GB. Unlike the Windows Vista operating system, the new Office does not demand the newest hardware. Office 2007 is supposed to work the same whether running on Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 or Windows Vista. At the very least, you'll need to have Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1 or Windows XP SP2 on a 500MHz processor with 256MB of RAM (512MB or more for Outlook with Business Contact Manager, which comes in the Small Business, Professional and Ultimate editions). However, of course, this rules out those still using older versions of Windows.
Although the terms of the EULA were less than transparent, we were pleased that Microsoft offered the least intrusive installation settings by default. For example, Privacy Options leaves it up to users to hook up to online Help automatically, as well as to download a file that continually tracks system problems. No Office 2007 shortcuts appeared on the desktop or in the system tray, either. The Office Shortcut Bar — a feature that disappeared in the 2003 version — is back, located within the Office Tools menu.
Interface
On opening each Office 2007 application, you'll see a radically different, blue interface that's brighter than in the past. Word, Excel and PowerPoint arrange features within a tabbed Ribbon toolbar that largely replaces the grey drop-down menus and dialogue boxes from a quarter-century of Office software. The Office logo menu, docked in the upper left corner, bundles many commands from the old File and Edit menus. Outlook lacks the logo button and adopts the Ribbon only within its message composition and scheduling windows. There's a core set of always-on tabs, as well as contextual tabs that hide until the software detects that you need them. For instance, the Picture Tools Format tab only shows up when you click on an image. We were stumped at first about how to format images, tables and charts until we got used to clicking on them first.
The Office 2007 programs, which share a new graphics engine, strongly emphasise ways to decorate documents. Pull-down Style Galleries let you preview how new fonts, colour themes, chart styles, images and so on appear before you apply the change. This is great for selecting from menus of fonts or page templates. At the same time, however, the 'intelligent' shape-shifting may bewilder those who don't realise that they must click a style to apply a formatting change. In most cases, the preformatted styles only present colours within the same range already used by your document. And sometimes the pull-down galleries jut into the document and obscure the charts or images you're trying to change, and you can't turn them off.
Nor do the dynamic previews apply to all style elements. For example, from the Page Layout tab of Word, PowerPoint and Excel, you can preview Themes of colours and templates by mousing over them. But the Page Borders option takes you to an unhelpful, old-school pop-up box without dynamic previews.
On the one hand, newcomers to Office software — particularly young, visual learners — may find the 2007 interface easier to master than Office 2003. Icons label most of the commands, and many expand into pull-down menus. There are inconsistencies, though, such as buttons that open older dialogue boxes. And many items have moved to places that we don't find intuitive. For instance, the dictionary and thesaurus in Word are under the Review tab, not References near the footnote and bibliography buttons. And the Insert Rows command in Excel 2007 is located beneath the Home tab, not the Insert tab. Likewise, PowerPoint's New Slide button is under Home instead of Insert. Notice a pattern? Although the Home tab houses many frequently used features, it's not the first place we look for them.
After more than a year of alternating between Office 2003 and test versions of Office 2007, we still found it hard to break old habits. Microsoft advertises the Ribbon's ability to help you 'browse, pick, and click'. If you're upgrading, though, you could get stuck in the 'browse' stage longer than you'd like, slowing your work.
Rather than piling on more features (Word 2003 alone had some 1,500 commands), Microsoft attempted to better show off functions that already existed. To some extent, the Ribbon meets this goal, as it's easier to find Conditional Formatting in Excel, among other sophisticated tools. And the View tab in Word and Excel better provides options for viewing two or three open documents at once.
You can customise Word, Excel, and PowerPoint to some extent, such as by adding buttons to the small, Quick Access Toolbar, but not as much as with their predecessors. Luckily, keyboard shortcuts remain the same; just press Alt at any time to see tiny 'badges' that label the quick keys for the Ribbon's commands. We like that you can hide the Ribbon by double-clicking on any tab. Plus, Microsoft has killed Clippy, the annoying animated pop-up assistant that would interrupt your work in Office 2003. A subtle new quick-formatting toolbar in Word 2007 fades in and out near your cursor. Overall, our favourite interface tweak is the slider bar in the lower right corner that lets you zoom in and out with ease.
Video
To view this content, JavaScript must be enabled and you need the latest version of the Adobe Flash Player
Images
Member reviews
The UK Pricing is almost double that of the same product in the US (Don't get me started on Language differences)
Full Version Upgrade Version
Office Standard 181% 176%
Office Home and Student 146%
Office Small Business 177% 186%
Office Professional 180% 182%
Office Ultimate 187% 183%
This is based on pricing from Global retailer Amazon, who should represent Global Purchasing Power combined with low costs of sale. yet they want to charge an 80% premium to UK customers.
Microsoft's view on this is that country pricing is with the retailers. But when UK consumers are being ripped off once again, and so universlly from all the retailers, you have to assume Microsoft has a piece of this under the table. And forget about ordering from Amazon.com or any other US e-tailer. They wont ship internationally.
- 9.00 out of 10
9.00 out of 10We generate aroudn 1Gb of Powerpoint alone every year. We have evaluated a copy of Office 2007. We shall not be using it. Here is why.
First, the prodiuct is exceptionally slow. It takes PP nearly a minute to load a 50 Mbyte file. Word takes as long to load. Once loaded, many macros and plug ins do not work properly, or at all.
Second, its 'look and feel' is a disaster for experienced users. There are two elements to this:
1: Even when customised with third party software, the ribbon takes three clicks where one sufficed before. There seems to be no reason to ditch ten years of experience for what is on offer.
2: The interface itself is wasteful of space. The graphics are seeminlgy random in design and colour. "Template" in PP produces something 3x4 cm on an orange background, drawing object that is tiny and grey on a grey-blue base. Many icons replicate each other: new drawing object and change drawing object. The working area jerks around spastically when sub menus are introduced. PP has a graduated background, which makes graphics look different from how they project. And so on...
Third, the innate opacity of Office seems to be taken to a higher level, It knows what you ought to want, and it will change only after negotiations. Users of e.g. Dreamweaver who are accustomed to telling the package what they want find this frustrating. Trying to import an Excel chart into PP is seamless if you want what it thinks you ought to want, but a half hour battle if you know your own mind.
One wonders what MS strategy people can have been thinking. We cannot be alone in rejecting this product. If it sits on the MS development line, then we are rejecting MS products forthe longer term. This has to be a general issue. Few companies can afford the 10-15 working days it will take to recover th eskilsl this package kills.
- 1.30 out of 10
1.30 out of 10The UI is not dramatically different to Office 2003; it is just dramatically poor. It is totally unintuitive; things that should be grouped together (e.g. inserting any different type of object) are not.
Big buttons & a lack of compatibility with old quick-keys & feedback on menu short-cuts makes this version of Office great if you've never used a word-processor before. But if you've been using Word for similar products for 20 years, it's really a backward step. Also; the need to constantly be at the mouse (which makes touch typing almost impossible).
I assessed whether to move my company to Star Office back in 2004. Star Office is the closest thing I've seen to this UI. In 2004 I chose to stick with Office 2003 ... I would recommend the same today. Office 2007 is junk.
- 1.70 out of 10
1.70 out of 10