WebEx Meeting Center

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Although it's difficult to master, WebEx Meeting Center's slick conferencing tools are an effective alternative to face-to-face conferences.… Read full review

Editors' rating:
  • 7.6 out of 10
7.6 out of 10
User rating:
  • 7.4 out of 10
7.4 out of 10

Pros

  • Powerful collaborative tools include application and whiteboard sharing, Outlook integration, multi-point video and VoIP audio

Cons

  • Mastering WebEx takes several hours of practice

Although at $75 (~£41) per seat, per month, WebEx Meeting Center seems expensive, it makes sense for cost-cutting businesses determined to trim travel expenses. This slick, Web-based conferencing service allows you to hold browser-based meetings in which you share applications and draw on an interactive whiteboard. WebEx also provides multi-point video for viewing up to four camera images at once, and Voice over IP (VoIP) telephony that supports full-duplex conversations that won't tie up your office phone lines. Or, if you prefer to use a more stable, less lag-prone landline, WebEx sets up free conference calls for your meetings. You can schedule and send WebEx Meeting Center meeting invitations from within Microsoft Outlook or start a conference simply by clicking a button from within Microsoft Office or Yahoo Business Messenger.

Of course, WebEx isn't perfect; it's difficult to learn, and video images froze inexplicably in our tests. With a little practice, however, WebEx Meeting Center can be an effective, money-saving alternative to the face-to-face conference.

Installation & interface
WebEx Meeting Center isn't desktop software. Rather, it's a collection of Web-based conferencing tools that let you conduct meetings via your browser. WebEx guarantees data integrity, privacy and high-speed performance by routing data packets (that is, your meeting) off the public Internet and onto WebEx's secure servers. All you need to do to make it happen is download and install a small plug-in during setup -- a task that takes just a few minutes for users with broadband connections. This system is nearly foolproof, with one caveat: each data packet begins and ends its journey via each meeting participant's ISP. So if your ISP or any attendee's ISP is experiencing severe congestion, session performance -- particularly bandwidth-hogging video and audio -- can suffer. In our tests, we found session speed to be quite good, with fraction-of-a-second delays when we controlled programs remotely. Once you purchase seats at the WebEx table, you can set up your company's meeting centre in one of two ways. You can purchase the WebEx Express package, which lets you set up a generic centre yourself. If you'd prefer a customised look (with your company logo and links to your Web site, for example), WebEx will build one for you, but for a fee -- anywhere from $1,000 to $3,000 (~£550 - £1,600), depending on the complexity of the project. Ouch! Meeting Center provides several ways to schedule and initiate a conference. One option is to log onto your company's Web site and complete a multi-step scheduling process: setting a meeting's start and stop times, inviting participants, and selecting whether the meeting is a one-time or a recurring event. By downloading additional plug-ins, you can initial and schedule meetings, as well as share files and applications, from within Microsoft Office and Outlook. The WebEx Meeting Manager interface is divided into three portions. The largest chunk, roughly two-thirds of the screen, is a blank window used for displaying documents, presentations and the WebEx whiteboard. Drop-down menus provide fast access to meeting settings, such as the ability to change participants' privileges and allow them to annotate documents. A smaller box in the upper-right corner lists the names of meeting participants; a similar box below it is used for online chat or note taking. The Meeting Manager is nicely laid out, but don't expect to master it immediately. We stumbled in our initial attempts to share applications and change the video settings. You'll need at least an hour's worth of practice before conducting WebEx meetings with clients. Also, note that the application sharing interface is somewhat clunky. In our tests, the cursor often vanished off the screen, making it difficult to highlight text or write in the margins of a Microsoft Word document.

Features
WebEx Meeting Center offers a robust assortment of conferencing tools, including application- and document-sharing functions, VoIP telephony that transmits audio over your Internet connection, and multi-point video that lets you view up to four thumbnail Web camera images at once. It's no bargain, however, with prices starting at $75 per port, per month for unlimited use (a port is like a seat at the conference table). A 20-person company could share five ports, for instance, and have five people meeting via WebEx at one time, including any outside attendees. Meeting Center's new video tools are designed to be plug-and-play. If you have a Web camera connected to your USB port, for instance, WebEx automatically activates the camera and displays your thumbnail image in the upper-right corner (you must click the Video tab to see it). All isn't perfect, however. We couldn't work out how to turn on multi-point video, which allows you to view up to four video images of meeting participants at once. But it turns out that our test site's functionality is different from a normal WebEx setup, which wouldn't ask you to make this decision. A call to WebEx tech support solved the problem (we simply needed to select Multi-point from the Meeting Options menu), but the process wasn't as intuitive as we would have liked. Presentations and shared documents are the heart of most business meetings, and WebEx delivers plenty of ways to display this information. As the host of a meeting, you can run conventional PowerPoint slide shows in a Meeting Center window or load a file -- an Excel spreadsheet, for instance -- and allow the other participants to either annotate comments or edit the original file. The whiteboard space is handy for jotting notes and pictures and works much like a traditional office whiteboard. Again, however, you'll need to spend some time with these tools; practice is crucial before you impose a WebEx session on a new client. Verbal communication, of course, is also essential. If WebEx's VoIP audio option doesn't suit you, or if you simply don't have a headset to attach to your PC, each participant can use a landline phone to chat, free of charge, via conference call (WebEx supplies the phone number, which appears on-screen before the session starts). We like the fact that WebEx supplies the conference number, which greatly simplifies the chore of setting up the audio portion of the meeting.

Service & support
WebEx includes free phone support, and given the steep price of Meeting Center, this benefit makes sense. We called a WebEx technician during regular business hours, and the hold time was less than one minute. The technician politely helped us with our video glitch -- one of our Web cameras kept crashing during meetings -- by suggesting we reboot the system. The fix worked, although we weren't able to determine what caused the camera to freeze up in the first place. The online support tools are very good. You'll find a comprehensive user guide with an interface very similar to that of a Windows help file, as well as FAQs with setup and usage advice. Email support is available as well.

Images

« Previous
Photo 1 of 3
Next »

Related stories

Member reviews

We started using this product 4 years ago when we started our company. We are a different company for it. Sales and Support would be very different if it wasn't for WebEx.

Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
8 June, 2004 13:03
Reply

We tried WebEx for the past 6 months, and I would say they have a good product. Difficult to learn at first, but it does an OK job. The problem is that it's too expensive. We began using Glance, eBLVD and WebConference.com. All three offer the same functionality as WebEx, but for a tenth of the cost. WebConference.com is by far the most comparable to WebEx, and it even exceeds WebEx on multiplay video capabilities.

I strongly recommend that you only use WebEx for your highly critical events, just for the Webex brand name. Otherwise, I would recommend WebConference.com as they have servers and telephony audio here in London.

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
12 June, 2004 09:10
Reply

We tried WebEx and our sales team was excited at first. A month later, only a few of them would use it. Their main complaint: "Too difficult to learn". We took Marv's advice and checked out Webconference.com and glance. Both tools are very easy to use. Our sales people have made Webconference a part of their daily business process, and although we have seen only a slight increase in sales, we have cut cost by 45 per cent. And Webconference is so inexpensive. I just hope that their current price is not for just a limited time.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
18 August, 2004 08:11
Reply

We have been using WebEx for 4 years now and we will continue to use it. It may be thought a little expenseive, but at the end of the day it is very reliable and this is what professionals are asking for. It is also very cost effective compared to all these travel expenses we save thanks to WebEx.

Member's rating:
  • 9.00 out of 10
9.00 out of 10
3 November, 2004 12:29
Reply

Bottom line is that they are way behind on pricing and if used regularly the bill is a big shock!!

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
25 November, 2004 23:06
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
16 March, 2005 09:38
Reply

I compared the new WebEx version recently released with Webconference.com's new multiplatform release. Webex new version is finally user friendly. Good job! However, their product lacks the standard features found in more robust services. For example, you can't stream movies. You can't have 10 simultaneous video streams. You can't brand the room with you logo. The desktop sharing feature is too slow. Additionally, Webex charges you an arm and a leg for their service. Webconference.com on the other hand comes standard with movie streaming, 10 simultaneous video streams and branding. Webconference.com is also very affordable. However, webconference.com scheduling interface is still the same old 3 year old interface with no improvements. It's time that they revamp the scheduling tool. It's outdated. I hope this helps.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
25 October, 2005 07:52
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
12 September, 2006 06:45
Reply

We compared WebEx, GoToMeeting and RHUB. We liked GoToMeeting best, but we thought RHUB's TurboMeeting was nearly as easy to use. We liked that RHUB gave attendees the option to join in a web browser, so it didn't matter what platform they were running on. Overall, we'll save quite a bit of money with the RHUB appliance by not having to pay monthly fees. http://www.rhubcom.com/

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
Maria12350 23 July, 2010 22:58
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

dede0202

Hello ALL USERS OF THE PIRATE BAY I WOULD PUT AN EXPLANATION ON PIRACY Story Idea ILLIGALE AND SHARING THOSE THAT NET Dissent NOT WELL BUT TO CA...

6 hours ago by dede0202 on The Pirate Bay infringes copyright, High Court decides
Sungwoo

do You know that? it can install 4G Ram. So i buy 4g and install It work! I can run call of duty 4,6,7 [Modern war... 1,2,3] Call of duty 1 was...

7 hours ago by Sungwoo on Loose Ends - Upgrading the Aspire One 522
itsajob

2. Bad idea. Making up patch cables loses you your commission from the cable supplier. 3. If you tidy up, other people can understand where the...

13 hours ago by itsajob on Ten IT jobs to save up for those rare lulls
Roberto_Store

Now On Sale, Unlocked iPhone 4S / Galaxy Note In Factory Box. Roberto-Techie(UK) ”Now on Sales” Smartphone, Android,Tablets,Gadget &...

17 hours ago by Roberto_Store on Samsung Galaxy S III lined up for sale
Paul Smyth

Is this classic FUD? One thing I would definitely have notice is a Mozilla threat to stop supporting GNU/Linux.

19 hours ago by Paul Smyth via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

23 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

1 day ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

1 day ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

2 days ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

2 days ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

2 days ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

2 days ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

2 days ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

2 days ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

2 days ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

3 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

3 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

3 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround