Windows XP Service Pack 2

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

We recommend installing Windows XP SP2, but only after Microsoft has had a few weeks to work out the kinks.… Read full review

Editors' rating:
  • 7.3 out of 10
7.3 out of 10
User rating:
  • 4.8 out of 10
4.8 out of 10

Pros

  • New firewall
  • pop-up ad blocker for Internet Explorer
  • new Security Center makes managing security programs easier

Cons

  • Created conflicts with our notebook's wireless connection
  • some security enhancements won't work with current Intel hardware
  • download too large for dial-up users, and CDs will take weeks to arrive once they're available

Windows XP users inhabit dangerous waters, beset by all manner of Internet-borne malicious code. Unfortunately, Microsoft's remedies have, until now, been restricted to a series of security patches that repelled only a few attacks at a time. Last Friday saw the arrival of Microsoft's long-delayed Service Pack 2 (SP2), which will help all of us keep our heads above water. SP2 tightens your PC's security with a new Windows Firewall, an improved Automatic Updates feature, and a pop-up ad blocker for Internet Explorer. Plus, the newly minted Security Center gives you one easy-to-use interface for keeping tabs on your PC's security programs. We suggest you pause before jumping ship, however. We downloaded and installed SP2 and weren't surprised to find a handful of conflicts with existing programs and wireless network settings on some of our test machines. Wait until SP2 is made available to your PC via Microsoft's Automatic Updates service, expected later this month for most users. By then, Microsoft should have had enough time to work out the kinks.

Setup & interface
In order to get our hands on Windows XP Service Pack 2's final code, we downloaded the whopping 266MB network installation package for all of our test machines as soon as it was available at Microsoft's Download Center. We suggest you exercise a bit more patience. After installing SP2, we encountered problems with our wireless network, which we suspect were related to an existing driver that the new version of Windows didn't like (Microsoft says that some driver conflicts are to be expected). Previously stable systems developed a tendency to disconnect and jump onto other available wireless local-area networks (WLANs), and one of our test systems kept losing its connection to a secure WLAN completely. Only rebooting would reconnect it. Microsoft expects to add SP2 to its online Windows Update service later this month. Download sizes will vary because your system will download only the components of the service pack it needs. If you've diligently updated XP, Microsoft estimates the download will be between 80MB and 100MB. That number could balloon to 270MB for less up-to-date systems, however. Dial-up users not looking forward to such a large undertaking should note that Microsoft will ship -- free of charge -- SP2 on CD-ROM, but delivery could take up to two months. Boxed retail versions of Windows XP with SP2 will be available by the end of October. If you've been waiting for a reason to upgrade to XP from an older version of Windows, this is as good a reason as any (Longhorn is still years away). Corporate IT managers will want to deploy with limited trials to check for compatibility with their current configurations.

Sign on for updates
If you've disabled Automatic Updates in your copy of Windows XP, we suggest you turn it on now. Once you install SP2, it too will urge you to turn on Automatic Updates. You can set Automatic Updates to do its magic at a given time each day -- a good idea, given what CNET (ZDNet's parent company) security expert Robert Vamosi calls the Eschelbeck Theory. Within the first month of any security flaw going public, a rain of worms and Trojan horses flood the Internet to take advantage of that flaw. The faster you fix the flaw, the safer you'll be -- and the safer we'll all be since the worms won't spread. Occasionally, a Microsoft fix may cause some problems with a particularly delicate Windows configuration. If you're worried that this will happen, you can set Automatic Updates to download but wait for your word before installing or simply alert you that there are updates available for download. Or, should you go it alone, you can just turn it off -- but we reserve the right to say, 'We told you so'.

Security Center
Microsoft bundles most of SP2's security enhancements into a single interface called the Security Center, which hides in the All Programs menu, under Accessories \ System Tools. In addition to providing a single interface for monitoring your system's firewall, (either Microsoft's or a third party's), Automatic Updates, and your third-party antivirus program, it tracks certain antivirus programs to make sure they and their virus signature databases are up-to-date. If you're using eTrust EZ Antivirus, F-Secure, McAfee Security, Panda, Symantec/Norton or Trend Micro, SP2 hooks into your software and alerts you when updates are available. If you use more obscure software, such as Frisk's F-Prot, you can click an 'I'll take care of it myself' box to avoid constant warnings that your system is not secure.

Features
Most of the new features found in Windows XP SP2 are related to making your PC more secure. Among its many enhancements, you'll find a new firewall, a pop-up ad blocker for Internet Explorer, added protection against attachments, and -- in some systems but far from all -- technology that helps keep malicious code from attacking via system memory. Microsoft built a software firewall called Internet Connection Firewall (ICF) into the first release of Windows XP, but it was turned off by default. For protection, you either had to hunt through system settings to turn it on, or more likely, you installed ZoneAlarm or another third-party firewall program. The extremely security-conscious use a hardware firewall router between their PC and Internet connection. SP2 ushers ICF out the door and replaces it with Windows Firewall, a more comprehensive and aggressive firewall. The first change you'll notice from the new software is that as soon as you install SP2, the firewall is turned on by default. Since no single firewall in entirely foolproof, we ran Windows Firewall alongside an existing installation of ZoneAlarm Pro. In our tests, the two coexisted fairly well: ZoneAlarm flagged every attempt by a new or updated software component to access the Internet, so we did get several warnings after upgrading to SP2. This problem quickly went away, however; we needed only to grant access for a program once to avoid future warnings for it. In some experiments with earlier versions of SP2, we found that the new Windows Firewall blocked programs with legitimate reasons to access our test PCs, such as ActiveSync connections with Pocket PCs. We didn't face this issue with the final version of SP2, however. Should you encounter such problems with your existing applications, you can easily make exceptions to allow your programs to skirt the new Windows Firewall. Using the new Firewall control panel, which you launch from Control Panel or by right-clicking any Internet connection, you can pick whatever networking or Internet connections you use (dial-up, broadband, or sundry networking connections) and set up exceptions and rules on a case-by-case basis. Windows Firewall is still rudimentary compared with firewalls in, say, the security suites from McAfee, Symantec or Zone Labs. Windows Firewall doesn't pop up a yes/no dialogue box for you to allow or block programs you've installed that access the Internet (a somewhat fussy feature that's popular with many ZoneAlarm fans). But in our tests, it did all the things a firewall should do, including protect a computer during bootup and shutdown. A quick trial run at the security site ShieldsUp showed our test systems were adequately cloaked from port-probing scripts. We strongly recommend keeping Windows Firewall turned on, even if you are running another software firewall. And if you aren't currently using a firewall, then there's absolutely no reason why you wouldn't want to run Windows Firewall. (For an alternative view of Windows Firewall, see here.)

Pop-up ads, begone
The bane of most Net surfers is the constant stream of pop-up ads. Wander into the wrong Web neighbourhood, and you not only get assaulted with unwanted advertising, you can also be infected by opportunistic code that changes your home page or worse. With SP2, Microsoft Internet Explorer gets a much-needed pop-up ad blocker. Like the new Windows Firewall, it's turned on by default. In our tests with medium-strength settings, IE's new pop-up blocker kept most offenders at bay, including JavaScript-spawned pop-ups such as those found at Tripod and Newsweek. In one or two cases, the pop-up blocker prevented a few windows from appearing that we wanted. At Download.com, for example, it suppressed our download window, and it also disabled one of Trillian's best features: an indicator that new Yahoo mail has arrived -- SP2 deemed the ActiveX code that signs you into the Yahoo Mail site insecure. Fortunately, the newly updated IE displays a grey bar beneath the address bar explaining what action its pop-up blocker has taken. To let pages through selectively, you just click this bar and select the Allow option. You can also add sites to an exceptions list by clicking a new Tools menu option and entering the URLs you want to allow through. Or if you prefer to use a third-party program, you can turn IE's new pop-up ad blocker off altogether.

Email and IM protection
But SP2 blocks more than just pop-ups. The new update adds a feature to Outlook Express that's available in the Microsoft Office 2003 version of Outlook: It can prevent HTML-formatted messages from displaying images and executing code. The HTML code within Bagle.aq, for example, will automatically execute the download of a Trojan horse on some vulnerable PCs without a user's intervention. This setting is reversible; you can display images on a case-by-case basis. Another SP2 security feature cautions you against opening email and IM attachments. Whether you're opening or saving an attachment from your email or IM client, you'll be given a warning to make sure you trust the source. This is the software equivalent of being asked at the airport, 'Did you pack your bags yourself and have they left your sight since you packed them?' Yes, it's a good message to reinforce, but no, it's not a real security measure.

Don't forget about system memory
To combat viruses and worms that take advantage of buffer overruns in your system's memory (Sasser, for example), SP2 includes its so-called Data Execution Prevention (DEP) feature, sometimes referred to as No Execute (NX), which prevents portions of your system's memory from running this rogue code. Only a small percentage of PCs, however, support this feature so far. No current Intel Pentium 4-based PCs can take advantage of DEP, and Intel won't release chips with DEP support until the end of the year at the earliest. The only desktop CPUs that support DEP are AMD's Athlon 64 and Sempron chips. Regardless of the type of system you own now, it's a good idea to install SP2. If you are considering purchasing a new PC soon and are really worried about buffer-overrun attacks, however, we suggest that you choose a PC with a new AMD processor or postpone your purchase if you want an Intel-based system. SP2 also throws in a welter of retooled features, including DirectX 9.0b multimedia API for better graphics and sound, and a setup routine for SmartKeys. The service pack includes Windows Media Player 9.0, also with improved security features. And two special versions of Windows XP get a complete OS overhaul with SP2. Tablet PCs receive Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005, which improves handwriting recognition among other tablet-specific enhancements. And first-generation Media Center PCs will be upgraded to Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004, an updated version of the specialised OS for machines that also serve as media hubs. Finally, XP's wireless capabilities are improved. There's a new user-friendly interface for wireless LAN (Wi-Fi) setup. But there are still too many configuration pages underneath the fancy new interface, and they are mostly unchanged from the previous version of XP. More substantive is XP's new native Bluetooth support. We plugged a Linksys Bluetooth adapter into our test system. Using XP's new built-in user interface and native Bluetooth hardware drivers, we were able to easily connect with a Bluetooth phone to transfer images and use it as a modem.

Service & support
Technical support for Windows XP SP2 covers the usual bases: you can email questions to Microsoft or find answers to some questions on an online FAQ page. Phone support is available (at National Rate, typically 8p a minute) between 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday.

Images

« Previous
Photo 1 of 3
Next »

Member reviews

I think this article is very helpful. It shows that your PC becomes safer when you install XP SP2, although buffer over runs are yet to be really solved.

Member's rating:
  • 8.00 out of 10
8.00 out of 10
12 August, 2004 10:19
Reply

I installed XP SP2 on a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop a couple of weeks ago. Even though it was Release Candidate 2, it's been stable, and the new features are very welcome.

The firewall is easy to configure, and non-obtrusive. The pop-up blocker is excellent. The only problems I've had have been it introducing a somewhat erratic ability to see any shared Internet Connections (this is related to the firewall but not easy to solve), and some problems with the wireless networking icon on the toolbar saying I'm disconnected, when I'm not.

Overall though, an excellent upgrade, and well worth it -- and I've had very few problems with any of the myriad of audio, visual, and office productivity software installed on my machine.

Member's rating:
  • 8.00 out of 10
8.00 out of 10
12 August, 2004 12:45
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
13 August, 2004 15:08
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 9.50 out of 10
9.50 out of 10
16 August, 2004 10:21
Reply

I tried installing SP2 after reading many good things about it. When I tried to install the service pack I got an error saying: 'A non-Windows kernel has been detected in boot sequence, setup can not continue and will now close'.

I couldn't believe it! I have Linux installed too on my computer but since that is none of MS's business who are they to prevent me from installing SP2 when you have Linux installed?

That's just pathetic.

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
16 August, 2004 20:38
Reply

XP's SP2 has a new feature called Security Center, which is on by default (this can be turned off in services, found in administrative tools). I don't need a program to tell me if my antivirus, my firewall, and my windows update, are all on and active. Also, can't seem to bypass other problem, it asks if I am sure that I want to go to my 'Trusted' sites! Don't worry! I'll beat this too!

Member's rating:
  • 6.50 out of 10
6.50 out of 10
19 August, 2004 12:06
Reply

(1) Security
So it fixes some of the security nightmares - so what's new. I don't use my Windows box for online banking etc anyway -- just too risky. DONT RISK IT.
(2) Freedom
SP2 Caused a real headache with my SuSE installation, had to abandon dual boot -- THANKS MS
(3) Investment protection
Incidently I bought an Apple with OSX at the same time as my XP laptop, what a difference. They were comparable at the time, now the OSX box is way, way ahead with 10.3 there is no comparison. OSX just sails ahead.
(4) Hairball
SP2 does nothing for the MS Software stack hairball -- am I the only one who installs media software only to find that stuff stops working due to conficts?
(5) End Game
This service pack has done it for me, I'm abandoning XP and am going to Run Java Desktop instead for the PC and move to Mac for daily computing. Sorry MS I can't stick the mess any longer -- you are not delivering.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
19 August, 2004 22:43
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 10
25 August, 2004 11:43
Reply

Too many conflicts with this program. Locked all Internet access as well as Norton products (Internet Security). Would not allow changes. Had to uninstall. Will wait to see what Microsoft plans to do about issues before reinstalling.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
27 August, 2004 10:42
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
30 August, 2004 01:45
Reply

I'm one of those people who suffer from the 'right clicking on an icon causes the computer to freeze after installing SP2' problem. I posted my problem on the Microsoft newsgroup but its been mysteriously removed. To be sure of a trouble-free install I think you need to do a fresh install of XP, and this would be just too much trouble for me for a relatively small improvement in security. I think the idea that this update can simply install automatically on the average home user's computer is deeply flawed, and Microsoft now seem to be recommending an awful lot of clearing up before you actually install the update.

One positive comment I can make is that the uninstall process proceeded without a hitch. But how long will I be supported with SP1a on my PC?

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
31 August, 2004 15:10
Reply

This operating system resulted in a near-miss when our computer would not re-boot after installation. Nearly had to re-install Windows! Computer is since behaving but still getting the odd glitch with Internet Explorer. My advice is wait until the update is stable before you try it.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
1 September, 2004 11:11
Reply

... but not sure how much good it's doing.

Member's rating:
  • 7.00 out of 10
7.00 out of 10
2 September, 2004 11:44
Reply

Ive installed all PCs -- my own PC, dad's and 2 PCs and working fine without out problems and it has very good security. I used McAfee VirusScan v8 Pro and Firewall Plus V5 also Surfsecret PestPatrol and it's still clean and no hidden virus/worm, etc.. -- SP2 seems very good under Athlon 64 as it protects the RAM from overflow, still no problems at all after install.

Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
2 September, 2004 20:33
Reply

This will close all the PCs out there with no firewall whatsoever, which will hurt DoS attacks.

Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
3 September, 2004 04:34
Reply

After I had installed SP2 on my two-year-old Dell desktop, the computer would not reboot. It took a two-hour session with Dell Tech Support to achieve an uninstall of SP2.

We were very close to the reinstallation of XP Pro which would of resulted in data loss and another 3 hours to reinstall everything.Thank you Microsoft!

PS: Dell has still not informed its customers about this conflict with their machines!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
4 September, 2004 05:29
Reply

FTP and email filter software stopped working and the firewall could not be configured to allow connection. At least System Restore sorted the problem!

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
6 September, 2004 14:03
Reply

After installation noticed no degeneration of performance on my Mesh 2.6 Pentium; neither did it affect any programs or peripherals.

Member's rating:
  • 8.00 out of 10
8.00 out of 10
6 September, 2004 15:28
Reply

...probably because I have kept XP up to date with all fixes.

Member's rating:
  • 8.00 out of 10
8.00 out of 10
6 September, 2004 16:02
Reply

There are so many bugs in a Windows system that even IT pros have a hard time fixing problems. Basic users are at the mercy of THE BIG ONE to field a poduct that is rock solid.

Member's rating:
  • 7.00 out of 10
7.00 out of 10
10 September, 2004 02:12
Reply

My spyware removed parts of the Service Pack 2 upgrade and I had to uninstall the entire upgrade. A complete waste of my time.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
10 September, 2004 05:17
Reply

For those of us already running virus protection, firewalls and ad blockers, MS is way too late with a product that has too many conflicts with existing programs.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
14 September, 2004 15:10
Reply

Weird things have been happening with my programs, expecially AOL which was meant to be compatible.

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
15 September, 2004 13:08
Reply

Installed onto XP Pro OEM which took ages. Seemed quite good at first...but then PC hung (no message just hung). Continued to do this erratically with reports that the PC was generatic malformed SMBs (Server Message Block) every minute or so. Microsoft suggested they were aware this was a problem and advised uninstallation. This went OK (though PC hung and had to be restarted during the process)! Something of an own goal methinks :)

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
15 September, 2004 14:10
Reply

After more than two hours peak time phone calls Microsoft Tech Support have no idea why this is happening. My computer manufacturer, although very helpful, hasn't cracked it yet either. Looks as if a complete re-installation of XP will be tried next -- what a pain THAT will be (so much to backup).

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
15 September, 2004 17:32
Reply

I'm on a laptop because I haven't been able to reboot my computer since I installed SP2. I haven't had time to reformat yet, but I will have to soon. Perhaps some haven't had problems with it, but this is the first major problem I've had with my computer in a very long time.

Member's rating:
  • 2.70 out of 10
2.70 out of 10
16 September, 2004 05:31
Reply

Not only do I have to spend 2 hours downloading this thing (and I'm on broadband), but when I finally get it installed (worked OK), I discover that I have a glorified personal firewall and pop-up blocking (which I had before) and that's about it.

Four or five of my applications stopped working completely, and the next day I got an infection while browsing the Web (some nasty DSO exploit) despite my use of the two leading anti-spyware applications and a subscription to McAfee's business-class anti-virus service -- all up to date and innoculated.

Nice. I spend the next two business days fighting to stop the pop-ups and looking up exploits instead of working, and frankly, I'm tired of it.

SuSE Linux, Apple, I don't know. But SP2 finally (after 10 years) is making me look at alternatives. Microsoft sucks, and SP2 is indicitive of why. 100 MB for *no* benefit.

Still, you need it, so go download and install it, and pray and hope it works for you.

Member's rating:
  • 3.00 out of 10
3.00 out of 10
17 September, 2004 12:22
Reply

I've got SP2 running on all my home built PCs (ranging from a 3.2GHz P4 to a Shuttle and an Athlon 1800) and have had no problems, all the PCs were up to date with all updates prior to installing it, have not yet found any problems or slowing down of the system.

Don't know if I've struck lucky but all the horror stories people told me about programs not working just haven't happened on the ones I've installed it on -- still plays all my games and burns CDs OK.

My advice would be to make sure everything's up to date and backed up and give it a try.

Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
18 September, 2004 09:15
Reply

...system hangs too much.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
22 September, 2004 06:46
Reply

It killed my hard drive, runs a lot slower, and is a pain to work with. SP2 blows. Glad I have a Linux hard drive to go back to.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
22 September, 2004 07:24
Reply

It made my PC crash twice and lost all my data. It doesn't run my company software so I have to develop an update patch for XP users. It even makes me lose all my valuable time to fight against it. It's more horrible than a virus. It's M$ Virus.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
24 September, 2004 13:57
Reply

I have a Toshiba laptop and a PowerSpec Desktop.
After installing XP SP2 on both machines they both now
hang. Keyboard doesn't work or the mouse. The hang will happen at bootup or at any time when the PC is up and running.

Going in Windows Update will make it hang for sure.
I am taking it off both machines and never put it on again.

I think it's time for Linux on a PC that is connected to the Web full time. Use Windows for other stuff like
Quicken. But for browsing and email use Linux. I am just about ready to try it.

Thanks Bill for the headaches.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
24 September, 2004 21:23
Reply

I dont have any problems with upgraded on my PC, laptop plus my dad PC -- it seems it has more secure as we dont have any attack such as virus, worm, etc..seem working good with SP2. PC Pro mags now selling free SP2 CD inside (I have 2 copies already -one from Microsoft and got other one from the PC Pro).

Member's rating:
  • 9.50 out of 10
9.50 out of 10
29 September, 2004 18:20
Reply

Brings to mind an old rec.humor.oracle quote: "Windows ... is a crawling abomination from the darkest pits of Hell."

Don't install this. Get a real OS.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
30 September, 2004 19:30
Reply

Upgraded from Windows 2000 Pro to XP Pro SP2. Big Microsoft advert in November PCW states enhanced firewall prevents programs from accessing the Internet as a default and will warn you if software attempts to do so. Not so on my machine (fails Leaktest), most reviews also confirm that XP SP2 firewall only blocks incoming traffic. Microsoft support in Reading thinks otherwise and agrees with advert. Suggest the reason it does not on my machine could be due to partial corruption and advises that I should re-install every thing!! Call this support. This is my last Microsoft product.

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
2 October, 2004 21:09
Reply

This is a real piece of crap. It has completely hosed one of my laptops (system restore was turned off). I can't even stay on long enough without the BSoD to uninstall. It is banished from my other laptop and 2 PCs. Anyone who is serious about computing was already better protected via firewall, spyware exterminators, and virus protection than they will be with this SP anyway. It is unstable and horrific as far as compatibility.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
3 October, 2004 20:28
Reply

- My wireless connection (Linksys), now NEVER drops out
- Surfing the web is much quicker
- Haven't had any of the problems listed by others.

First service pack released by Microsoft that I haven't had any trouble with... yet!

Member's rating:
  • 8.00 out of 10
8.00 out of 10
4 October, 2004 02:56
Reply

I installed SP2 and the biggest changes are a Security Center, a better Firewall, a pop-up blocker for those that still use IE, and a minor change to the loading screen.

The Security Center allows for quick access to the controls for the Firewall, Internet Options, your Virus Scanner (hell, it even recognizes AntiVir, which is a freeware program, as a virus scanner, which is awesome), and Automatic Updates.

The firewall now has greater control that is much easier. Once you enable it, you can set "exclusions" and everything. The basic menus are great for non-power users when power users have a much more refined and streamlined Advanced options for the firewall. And to make it better, it detects which programs you are running and automatically excludes them from the firewall.

I can't comment too much on IE's pop-up blocker. Firefox is good enough for me.

The loading screen is the best change ever. You know how XP Home used to have green boxes that rotated? Now they are blue just like on WinXP Pro. Which is totally kickass. Microsoft's green sucks. Now, if they just included a way to change that stupid green Start button with Windows...that would be heaven.

Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
6 October, 2004 11:28
Reply

I've installed SP2 on my laptop and had zero problems with it. I do experience the neat Security Center (you really need something like that running Windows). So overall, I'm happy.

Member's rating:
  • 7.00 out of 10
7.00 out of 10
9 October, 2004 21:17
Reply

What a shocker, installed on my laptop and hey presto the performance problem that Microsoft denies all knowledge of hits like a hammer. Laptop now takes 15 mins to boot up as opposed to less than 1. All applications run like snails. No wonder it's secure, nothing bloody works! Avoid like the plague if you are running a laptop.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
11 October, 2004 20:15
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
12 October, 2004 04:08
Reply

This "upgrade" is supposed to improve stability and security. It does neither -- two of our installs were hacked over the Net within hours of installing the service pack. It breaks most firewall products and prevents Norton IS working properly. We also suffered a larger than usual number of crashes -- before SP2, time to crash was typically 24 hours, now it's closer to 24 minutes! Windoze XP is now totally unusable for anything other than the casual home user.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
13 October, 2004 15:08
Reply

I can't believe what a nuisance XP SP2 has been to my computer. My computer is an excellent top-name brand one with all the memory and power you can have, there's no reason that SP2 shouldn't work on my computer. I don't pay hundreds and thousands of dollars for an operating system that crashes my computer, no matter how many times I re-install it or update it. This is a travesty to the world of computers. Sorry to be harsh, but this is just reality.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
19 October, 2004 20:02
Reply

Spent the morning downloading it and the afternoon uninstalling it. Before SP2 my system worked perfectly, after SP2 ran slowly and my ADSL Router wouldn't connect properly, had to keep reconnecting. After removing SP2 router is now working fine again. If you run a 3rd party firewall (I use zone alarm) and antivirus and spyware blocker (eTrust & Spy Blaster), can't see the need for SP2.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
25 October, 2004 16:42
Reply

I don't know what new features SP2 added to my system because I can't boot my PC; tried re-installing about 8 times.

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
26 October, 2004 18:59
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
28 October, 2004 16:09
Reply

Installed on 1 Oct 2004, crashed 2nd Oct 2004. How did it happen? MS knowledge base waste of time [I have 2 PCs] Reinstalled XP Home + SP2 on the crash victim and wollop! CRASHED AGAIN. Everything is fine on the PC without SP2. That is why I am able to write this. I am in the process of reinstalling XP on the CRASH VICTIM again BUT I WILL NOT INSTAL SP2 -- no way! When say in 12 months time when all the problems have been ironed out MAYBE! I will try again. BUT by then Bill G will have had another inspiration to con us, all over again?

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
30 October, 2004 16:59
Reply

After more than 10 attempts, I finally got my system upgraded to XP SP2 (so I thought). The upgrade would hang and go to sleep at the "Restore Point" every time I tried to install it. When I thought I got this monster under my right thumb, all hell broke loose on my computer. I am now compelled to start from scratch and wipe this pest out of my system once and for all. SP1 was a charm. SP2? What a mess! What a pain! Who thought of it?

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
2 November, 2004 15:31
Reply

Crashed my computer. Cannot use System Restore. Cannot access Internet. Called up Microsoft (people there couldn't help. Asked me to call up my ISP, and said they (ISP) should install a patch!?) Never again. NEVER.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
3 November, 2004 22:01
Reply

Downloaded onto my new Toshiba laptop as suggested (80MB!) and it switched off my wireless Internet connection! My Belkin router could no longer see my laptop.

Switched off the firewall etc., and still no good.
Belkin were a big help but could only suggest a system restore.

Restored with my Toshiba disks and -- hey presto -- wireless Internet came back instantly.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
3 November, 2004 23:56
Reply

Crashse system, slow to use. I feel that it might have been better to put it out in smaller bits. That would have enabled the user to find the fault in small parts. Also have a good unloader or have a larger set of people for final test. Good try -- better when the fixes come out .

Member's rating:
  • 4.00 out of 10
4.00 out of 10
4 November, 2004 00:31
Reply

Only thing I did was to turn off the firewall, as I use another. My system has had no problems since. But I have heard from others who have. I reccomend that poeple ensure their system is configured correctly before installing. Also check for registry problems, using applicable sftware like spybot S&D.

Member's rating:
  • 9.50 out of 10
9.50 out of 10
6 November, 2004 21:17
Reply

I have MSI-DR8A, my friend has MSI-DR4 Dual DVD writer drives. These don't work correctly anymore since CLEAN installation of Win XP SP2. It seems that it is OK to copy e.g. one file from DVD to hard disk, but I can't copy many files or the whole dir at once. Well, do I have to tell you that under SP1, everything was allright?
!$M KCUF

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
7 November, 2004 03:11
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
7 November, 2004 04:04
Reply

The system was with freshly installed XP + SP1, I started the update process, it finished successfully, restart...and...[who said that XP does not have a blue screen :-) ] BLUE SCREEN (improvement no.1)...restart...the login screen seems a little different (improvement no.2), click on my name...BLUE SCREEN (back to improvement no.1), restart...BLUE SCREEN.
And that's forever!

If you have any troubles with SP2 it can be easily removed using Safe mode (press F8 before windows starts) -> Add/Remove Programs -> XPSP2

Enjoy!

Member's rating:
  • 3.00 out of 10
3.00 out of 10
8 November, 2004 17:02
Reply

Installation has made my computer unbootable! My computer had every update & patch, was free of all spyware, etc. I installed from CD: installation was complete, and message said restart was necessary; Windows hangs up during boot -- System Restore and Safe mode are useless. I'm screwed!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
13 November, 2004 04:58
Reply

Network knackered, software not compatible, occasional boot problems, what more can I say!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
13 November, 2004 11:33
Reply

There is no problem with startup, but PC goes absolutely slow after installing SP2.

Member's rating:
  • 6.50 out of 10
6.50 out of 10
17 November, 2004 09:34
Reply

Fixed EVERY problem I had with my wireless network and most with Windows.

Only bad thing: I think the warnings about the computer being insecure are a little... "aggressive"

Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
24 November, 2004 00:55
Reply

I have broadband and it was downloaded in no time. Helps remind me to update security and I have experienced none of the problems of other users.

Member's rating:
  • 9.50 out of 10
9.50 out of 10
24 November, 2004 02:36
Reply

This upgrade is a very good step towards a safer Windows. I've had no troubles at all during installation and I won't need any 3rd party pop-up-killers anymore.

Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
2 December, 2004 14:16
Reply

Luckily I was able to save my PC after downloading this gem from Microsoft. I would definitely wait for them to debug this one.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
2 December, 2004 19:37
Reply

I installed Service Pack 2 and it's great. One thing you want to make sure is that you remove any spyware and do not walk away from the computer. A DSL connection also is very very very helpful. It took 10 mins to install and everything is great, take your time installing and take your time.

Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
9 December, 2004 19:19
Reply

Though the service pack keeps my PC free of pop-ups, it nearly took 2GB of disk space. Finally, Microsoft wrote a software that eats up 2GB for hard disc space JUST to block the pop-up windows. Don't know whether to cry or smile.

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
12 December, 2004 17:46
Reply

I installed SP2 on one machine several days ago and so far haven't had any problems at all. Installed it on another machine yesterday and now chkdsk runs on every boot and XP constantly pops up a message saying "c:\$mft is corrupt or unreadable. Run the chkdsk utility." Haven't been able to find a solution yet so I'm uninstalling the thing. Good luck if you're brave enough to attempt an install of SP2!

Member's rating:
  • 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 10
28 December, 2004 15:46
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
30 December, 2004 02:59
Reply

With no valuable instructions at the time I installed it, I was upset when it froze up upon reboot and would only show the desktop background for more than 10 min. I finally ended up re-installing winXP altogether. I do NOT intend to install SP2 now that I have restored my system to operable status again.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
6 January, 2005 14:06
Reply

Wireless Networking Stopped Working following installation of Service Pack 2. A Wireless NEC laptop with the latest wireless network drivers would not detect the prescence of a wireless AP, or a wireless network point.

These devices were placed within 1m proximity. The Wireless Network Connection dialog box shows unusual behaviour, where the box in the bottom right corner says "Connect" when its already connected or says "Disconnect" when it's already disconnected. It has taken a software engineer like myself with 12 years' experience 6 hours to configure a wireless network, only to have one out of two laptops operating. The laptop that is not operating is the one being affected by SP2's wireless networking flaws.

Member's rating:
  • 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 10
7 January, 2005 02:40
Reply

Effectively, MS did it again! This upgrade does not offer too much. There are already safer tools around to provide firewall and other security issues.

So, I do not see the improvement in functionality.
What is worse, is that stability is much lower. The computer has to be rebooted from scratch when going to sleep. So I lost this important feature of my laptop.
In summary, I highly recommend not to upgrade to this shit.

If you really want an upgrade, move to a Unix-based system.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
7 January, 2005 14:50
Reply

My system has run dog slow since the SP2 "upgrade". DSL connection will not connect for 3 minutes after bootup. BlackIce keeps stopping. Applications start very slowly. System lockups are abundant etc, etc, etc. Uninstalled SP2 last evening and everything runs like greased lightening. DSL connection now connects immediately. The SP2 CD goes into the trash tonight. I won't be back.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
12 January, 2005 18:28
Reply

Installing this update on my laptop running XP causes it to freeze constantly. This only way to stop it is to system restore / format my laptop. SP2 is awful.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
14 January, 2005 16:09
Reply

Even after I managed to get installed after it failed to find about 20 required install files, it now locks my computer at boot. I thought it was a coincidence so I re-installed windows altogether. Same problem: as soon as SP2 is installed. Honestly I gave it a fair chance, but 3 strikes now and its out! You have been warned!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
16 January, 2005 00:43
Reply

Installed and had to uninstall. Explorer kept crashing so the computer was unusable. I don't know if it had anything to do with using ZoneLabs' firewall.

Member's rating:
  • 2.70 out of 10
2.70 out of 10
18 January, 2005 21:23
Reply

The install of SP2 killed my OS....!!!! I lost networking and any means of remote access. I lost my documents -- I could not restore as the restore points could not be found!

I had to rebuild my PC, so I installed a clean OS and attempted to reinstall SP2. Two days later it's up and running -- but there's more.

Security settings are too intrusive, I cannot change my IE security settings. PU Blocker is too intrusive. Thanks Microsoft. Some Web sites cannot be viewed due to Active X components.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
23 January, 2005 17:10
Reply

If you like to have problems, go ahead and install it. I have repaired some 2000 computers in my life and I can assure you that Windows SP2 is not worth a .... STAY AWAY FROM IT. If you dont want pop-ups with IE, install Firefox instead.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
24 January, 2005 21:18
Reply

Has caused nothing but problems. I contacted Microsoft and they are obviously trained to be like Clinton and deny all knowledge or that anything is wrong! They blamed it on my ISP!!! Went back to SP1, and everything is great again.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
4 February, 2005 17:39
Reply

For novices who use IE and don't even know how to change thier home page off MSN this is probably a good thing, but the fact is it does causes stalls and the stupid security center is virtually worthless. Reminds me of the Macafee security thing. The wireless pack is OK, but the fact is systems ARE slowed by this service pack. so If you know how to set your own firewall, update you anitvirus, and update security fixes I'd skip this one. Also my DVD burner and CD rom drivers were replaced and since then I have had some problems installing certain games. I think some copyright countermeasure is a little haywire.

Member's rating:
  • 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 10
6 February, 2005 00:29
Reply

Can only recognize 2/3 partitions on my hard drive :D.
Destroys the ability to open the Control Panel, which is not good... Unless you need to memorise which .CPL files do what.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
7 February, 2005 11:44
Reply

Ever since I have tried running this update I have had problems after problems!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
14 February, 2005 20:08
Reply

I think D-Link and Microsoft are equally culpable in the fact that installation of SP2 destroyed my wireless network. The D-Link configuration utility will not work even with the latest updates. The only way my network will function is unencrypted despite days of working on the problem. No encryption problem with identical hardware running service pack 1. Given the volumes of D-Link hardware out there you would have thought some testing might have been done. I must also claim some responsbility as I did not follow my tried and tested policy of waiting 1 full year after launch before using any Microsoft offering. I only did it this time because of concerns over Microsoft security issues. Never again.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
16 February, 2005 18:47
Reply

SP2 is a good update if you just prepare your system for it. Run a good spyware scan like Ad-aware or Spybot. Check your PC for virusses. Update all your drivers and your bios if needed, check with your system manufacturer on that. Do all the Windows updates that are there before sp2. Take it from me, I do tech support for SP2 and I run a network with 50 PC's on it and each one has SP2 on it. Security is the main thing that SP2 does, and with that I do not just mean the firewall or security center, I mean data prevention. Take it from me, prep your system and install it.

Member's rating:
  • 9.50 out of 10
9.50 out of 10
16 February, 2005 20:29
Reply

caused system instability, wasted time and effort troubleshooting everything else before realizing the culprit, Service Pack 2, and when I uninstalled, left all my drivers and configs in dissarray.

Member's rating:
  • 4.00 out of 10
4.00 out of 10
16 February, 2005 23:36
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
22 February, 2005 15:11
Reply

Don't plan on this being bug-free for SAS version 9.1.3.
There is a memory conflict when using large amounts of memory when in the SAS editor mode.

For larger memory programs you need to be under service pack 1, NOT 1a, or 2. Otherwise you have to submit processing in batch mode to get it to run. No excuse for this kind of stuff.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
22 February, 2005 16:14
Reply

Install SP2. First set a restore point, check your pc for viruses, trojans and adwares. All these can compromise your SP2 installation and your systems afterwards.

Better safe than sorry...

Member's rating:
  • 7.50 out of 10
7.50 out of 10
23 February, 2005 21:53
Reply

I've had the pleasure to have installed SP2 twice. Once from CD and the other, download.

Both times the system would run fine for a day or two then start to freeze at the "Welcome" window. I entered safe mode and scanned for spyware and viruses, all clean. I checked the NTFS partition to see whether it was dirty; nope, it was clean. Tried to restore my system, none of the points would work, all failed. In the end, I had to reformat.

SP2 isn't worth the effort nor the time.

Member's rating:
  • 4.00 out of 10
4.00 out of 10
24 February, 2005 22:57
Reply

Seriously, now I can't get on secured sites, MSN is buggered, computer keeps crashing...

Came on this site to get some help, while I'm here I thought I better warn everyone not to touch this download with a 10ft barge pole!

5 March, 2005 20:59
Reply

Computer went from decent to a snail. Irritating pop-ups from Microsoft Security Center for virus updates and updates available. If you are on a secured network, no virus should come in. Read downloads before install to prevent spyware and stay out of the porn sites and you should be fine.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
12 March, 2005 07:25
Reply

I upgraded a stable(!) WinMistakeEdition install to XP...It was stable until SP2. Figuring it was a glitch resulting from the upgrade, I installed clean to a new HDD. I can conclusively blame SP2. Microsoft has never come out with a better product for turning thousand dollar systems into boat anchors and doorstops.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
14 March, 2005 13:55
Reply

pristine seamless user interface for 1 comfy with link chasing set up.i enjoy low end user security so find sp2 a great addition and quite easy to maintain.the 1 sided firewall is disappointing in limitation yet good for its purpose,do not rely wholly on it though,or you will eventually be chasing ghosts in your system.i have used zone alarm for years and rely on it for seamless interactive information and alerts.sp2 and za together with its antivirus pack or if as i you prefer multiple interactive security suites and use a robust antiviral such as pccillin,will give the novice or pro a good option for security.razir rox blog chaser and game addict from idaho....

Member's rating:
  • 9.00 out of 10
9.00 out of 10
30 March, 2005 22:00
Reply

It seems that SP2's focus on security paid off. The only problem is that they didn't pay much attention to the rest of the OS. System stability is not great. Not compared to SP1. What makes me angry is that there is a list of programs that do not work (the list is very long) and that MS has done little about it.

I can't run a lot of applications including some of my games.

Performance hasn't been affected too much, but by the looks of it, I'm lucky to be able to say that.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
3 April, 2005 18:59
Reply

This is an essential download.
The only reason it gets bad reviews is because of noobs who dont know how to turn their PC on.
Fixes way more problems than it will ever create. Get it!

Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
4 April, 2005 22:53
Reply

There are may compatibility issues with XP Service Pack 2. Had a hard time figuring out the root cause. Explorer.exe would keep terminating for no reason and I had to reinstall the software right from scratch.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
12 April, 2005 19:53
Reply

From 30 computers I've repaired (all installed with SP2), only one actually works fine after some adjustment. The rest would complain of....(the list is too long...)

Member's rating:
  • 3.00 out of 10
3.00 out of 10
14 April, 2005 10:19
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
18 April, 2005 17:49
Reply

Backup your entire system before you install xp sp2. Installation works fine on some systems but, may cause unrecoverable errors on other systems. Any advantagous features provided by sp2 is not worth the potential for disaster that installing sp2 is capable of.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
27 April, 2005 18:02
Reply

MS does not allow updates for XP if you do not upgrade to SP2. I knew that something will be terribly wrong from people who complain about the product. I didn't want to install the update but I've got virused as MS do not let me update my system! This is plain stupidity! Is like you are not allowed to buy a gun to defend yourself if you did not have an armored vehicle and a bunker! I did PAY for XP guys, why I am forced to do something against my will? Why your support is such rubbish?

Anyway... I put the update. Everything sucks! The system is terrible slow, crashed frequently and many applications do not run properly or present conflicts!

I know there are solutions out there for XP problems, but I will tell you mine: I just bought an APPLE! It has the TIGER and I swear that I never used before an APPLE and in two days only I LOVE IT! It is WAY WAY WAY MORE FRIENDLY than any MS system. If you are afraid that it is different... well it is different but in the better way! Otherwise it is absoultely beautiful. Everything is much easier on Tiger! Everything! It is click and install, click and run, don't be afraid!

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
16 May, 2005 04:52
Reply

SP2 hosed my wireless network and Internet connection even on a hard-wired-to-cable machine. Went through all the precautions and it still failed on 5 of 6 different machine installations and slowed down the 6th one.

Removed it - not worth the BS. This was a badly thought out "upgrade".

Member's rating:
  • 3.00 out of 10
3.00 out of 10
18 May, 2005 21:33
Reply

Downloaded SP2 on April 1 and it resulted in a total computer failure. New hard drive required and re-installation of software. Many thanks Mr Gates!

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
19 May, 2005 16:07
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 7.50 out of 10
7.50 out of 10
19 May, 2005 17:50
Reply

look all u wingers there, sp2 has fixed a load of bugs in xp and the security features are birlliant ive had no problems and people complaining of hardware failure are tring to find sum1 to blame for their own in compentance. this was a brilliant update and all of the hype that itll break your pc is a load of bull. it works and at that it works well.

Member's rating:
  • 8.50 out of 10
8.50 out of 10
21 May, 2005 14:15
Reply

I have installed XP SP2 on a number of machines, all without problem except one which required a patch for the particular Intel processor. On that machine I received a fatal error message and the 'Blue Screen' so I was unable to recover the situation by uninstalling SP2

I found it particularly difficult to find any useful support information and had to dig very deep to get the solution for the patch which was needed for the problem processor. Of course, I had to use another computer to research the problem and, until resolved, the problem computer was rendered useless. Hardly satisfactory for the major operating system.

Not withstanding, XP SP2 does appear to be a much needed improvement to Windows XP I wonder if it is only tinkering around the edge rather than addressing the real problems with Windows.

Member's rating:
  • 6.00 out of 10
6.00 out of 10
22 May, 2005 09:53
Reply

there was no warning about any chance of crash, sound card problems & driver problems. Microsoft was NO HELP! WE had to pay them just to speak with them and they had no idea what to do. Microsoft should have been more helpful and informative on potential damage as we were new computer owners and trusted their updates to be safe (never again!!!).It cost us a lot to have it fixed and the loss of everything in our machine was heartbreaking but it won't happen again! I did learn.... I have spoken to many people that removed it from their computers.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
10 June, 2005 18:14
Reply

I've installed SP2 on two computers now and eventually the Windows firewall, at least I'm assuming that is what did it, (which is off on my computer since I use Norton Firewall) blocked my wireless connection. I can connect to other people's connections, but mine is blocked. I installed SP2 on my laptop almost 5 months ago and I'm just now encountering this problem on it. However on my desktop the problem arose within an hour after installation. I've tried everything I can think of to fix the problem, but the only thing that works is uninstalling SP2.

While I love many features in the pack, I already have security out the wazoo on my computer and SP2 has just caused too many network connection headaches.

Member's rating:
  • 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 10
16 July, 2005 05:38
Reply
Member's rating:
  • 8.00 out of 10
8.00 out of 10
18 July, 2005 09:59
Reply

After downloading service pack 2 my computer would not boot except in safe mode -so one I made it to safe mode I uninstalled sp2 and from then on ignored all sp2 notices - we would like to run sp2 but could not find any assistance

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
18 August, 2005 23:06
Reply

After XP2 with in 6 months more than 9 PCs
crash, out of 40. After this Blue screen you have to reinstall all from scratch, totally wastage of time, better to stick windows 2000 Pro, if you are not utilizing new features of XP.

Hardware-hungry; needs > 2GHz CPU with min 512MB RAM for smooth running.

Member's rating:
  • 7.00 out of 10
7.00 out of 10
13 September, 2005 05:48
Reply

It is incompatible with BlackIce and crashed my computer -- I will throw this crap into trash. I wish I could do it also for Microsoft itself!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
26 September, 2005 15:55
Reply

Had problems being unable to connect to internet through my cable modem, unable to use my Wireless router, and it was a nightmare. Have now gone back to SP1 and will stay like that until the next major version of Windows launches.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
22 January, 2006 09:44
Reply

I love reading through these comments, one user actually blamed SP2 for a hard drive failure. HA! Software causing a mechanical failure, that's great! I would take all this negative feedback with a grain of salt. You should NEVER ignore an entire service pack update! Wow, to even think about not applying it is ludicrous. By not using it your really opening yourself up for some trouble. Make sure your machine is spyware free, and you should have no problem. As an IT Admin, i've applied it to hundreds of machines with very few problems, and if there is a problem, it is always a 3rd party software developer issue.

Member's rating:
  • 10.00 out of 10
10.00 out of 10
27 January, 2006 20:04
Reply

Yeah, It's dead. Why don't you just take the time to test the products you release? Because of that 'minor' step you skipped, only thousands of people have to suffer from it. Including me, don't worry, there was only 4 years of non-recorded information in the hard drive I may never gain access to again. I might as well just rub a magnet all over it and get it over with now. Every time I turn the computer on, I get to the windows loading screen, there... Simple blue screen, my favorite color, but at this rate not for long. But what really astonishes me, is that I got the privelege to endure that seemingly interminable downloading screen to get this. I just needed it so I can run another program at home to do school programming work. Oh, another thing, one of the libraries near where I live was ecstatic when they downloaded this program recently after I did. Exact same results too. Thanks, this just fixed all of my problems. Well, at least I can go to the LIBRARY to check out that book.

1 February, 2006 21:30
Reply

At launch SP2 security was atrocious, and the fact you can't turn anything off without Windows bitching and complaining about it is annoying

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
12 February, 2006 07:21
Reply

The machine was working fine until I put on SP2. It crashed the entire system and I couldn't even get it to safe mode. I want to install microsoft patches but it is clear microsoft has gone the way of the rest of the world in providing inferior products to force consumers to spend more money.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
18 February, 2006 21:25
Reply

//I love reading through these comments, one user actually blamed SP2 for a hard drive failure. HA! Software causing a mechanical failure, that's great! I would take all this negative feedback with a grain of salt. You should NEVER ignore an entire service pack update! Wow, to even think about not applying it is ludicrous. By not using it your really opening yourself up for some trouble.//

So - you mean MS's pre-sp2 OS's were a total disaster, but NOW you trust them. Right?
You REALLY sound like you know your stuff. Everyone here is a real amateur... I expect you just slay all the coders and unix boffins all the time.

//As an IT Admin, i've applied it to hundreds of machines with very few problems,//

Lol.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
6 March, 2006 13:40
Reply

Anyone who hasn't already secured their systems via alternate web browser, firewall, AV, etc. should probably install this. For all the rest of us whose heads haven't been up their arses the past 4 years, and remember the Service Pack 1 fiasco (SP1"a" is fine at least), you already know how well you can trust MS.
Think about this: both SP's combined total almost 400MB! They're comprised mainly of individual fixes (patches) released over the years for XP. Something that needed this much fixing should never have been sold for money in any country. Of course anyone who relies on MS for their livelihood isn't going to tell the truth. The rest of us can be honest though.

Member's rating:
  • 3.00 out of 10
3.00 out of 10
22 March, 2006 20:54
Reply

Alot of people bash Microsoft XP, but the fact is, that this OS is like fine china. As with SP2, you must use it with care. You need to make sure all spyware and viruses are off your machine before you install. Also, back a back-up of your system before you do. If you install correctly, you will not have crashes or performance issues, it's that simple. Most people who trash up their systems blame developers, which is really a joke. I admit, Windows can be a major pain at times, but once again, it's fine china, so treat it with care, and you'll have no problems.

Member's rating:
  • 7.50 out of 10
7.50 out of 10
25 March, 2006 19:43
Reply

I attempted to download the XP service pack 2. It kept hanging up during installation. It took an extremely long time to install even though I have a cable connection. My Windows media player would not start, even though I downloaded it again like it suggested. On boot up, I get a black screen that stays up for a while. When trying to access the control panel, it shows the flashlight like it can't find it. After uninstalling the pack, things seem to work better again. I don't recommend downloading this, at least not right now, seems like there are a lot of bugs to it that should have been worked out before Microsoft released it.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
16 April, 2006 03:47
Reply

First of all, I'm an IT professional who did a lot of research prior to installing SP2, so I knew how to do it right. A lot of people have mentioned the need to remove spyware, update drivers, and incompatibility with certain applications. With my machine well prepped, it wouldn't boot after installing SP2. I have successfully installed it on some fresh machines. All in all, I can only recommend this update to amateur users who don't know how to secure their machines manually- they will benefit from the automatic security features. For anyone else, I just don't see why bother. XP ran just fine for years with SP1, and now all of the sudden MS acts like the world will end if users don't install SP2. No one should have to go through this much trouble after paying good money for a shody product.

Member's rating:
  • 3.30 out of 10
3.30 out of 10
21 May, 2006 22:47
Reply

Installed SP2 on a number of computers. Fine, no problem, fixes a number of security holes and is particularly good at protecting people with little or no technical knowledge.

However, one of my PC's has a graphics card which is incompatible with SP2. Doesn't matter if you install from XP SP2 CD or if you install XP SP1 and upgrade to SP2 later.. as soon as SP2 is on there - it won't boot. Safe mode makes no difference - just freezes with corrupted colours on the splash screen.

Do microsoft acknowledge this problem? do they hell. In fact, I've just seen some pop up telling me *I*HAVE*NO*CHOICE* but to upgrade to SP2 if I want to continue recieving support.

My point is: I got no fundamental problem with SP2 but now I'm in a position of needing to buy a new VGA card in order install SP2 so that Microsoft will let me keep my machine patched to fix holes they left there in the first place...

I am seriously pi$$ed with m$

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
11 June, 2006 14:56
Reply

Yes - b.s.o.d. after install. Had to do system restore.
Unfortunately I now have some expensive software which will not install unless I have SP2 installed! Great.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
18 June, 2006 15:21
Reply

I installed sp2 with no problems about a week ago. Yesterday for an unrelated reason I had restored the pc to factory condition. Since then I have had nothing but blue screens when trying to install the software. I have followed every type of advice; driver updates, virus checkers etc.. my 4th blue screen came after I'd even tried the thing in safe mode.
I'm quite fed up and annoyed that Microsoft have released this product, obviously without ensuring it's reliability.

Member's rating:
  • 6.50 out of 10
6.50 out of 10
27 August, 2006 20:56
Reply

Been running sp1 and never once have I crashed all top of the line hardware. The moment I install this BSOD before windows can only get into safe mode. DELETE this sp2 never use it unless you do not know how to protect your computer and aren't a true gamer then go dl it get an ulcer...

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
12 September, 2006 21:39
Reply

Removed all spyware, ran aboutbuster, adaware, spybot, every program known to man in safe mode and all files unhidden. I then proceeded 4 times to intall sp2 all BSOD before you get to windows pushing a LOOP reboot. All hardware is top of the line never had 1 crash with sp1. I do suggest to stay away from this if you are computer savvy and know how to protect your stuff. The other computer I did get this working on runs SLUGGISH a very bloated operating system. Stay away from it like it's AIDS.

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
12 September, 2006 21:43
Reply

Completely fucked up my system, computer lags, constantly crashes, firewire inputs have become slower than usb 1, etc.

So bad it has led me to try Linux.

Member's rating:
  • 1.00 out of 10
1.00 out of 10
1000030281 23 April, 2007 11:58
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

dede0202

Hello ALL USERS OF THE PIRATE BAY I WOULD PUT AN EXPLANATION ON PIRACY Story Idea ILLIGALE AND SHARING THOSE THAT NET Dissent NOT WELL BUT TO CA...

7 hours ago by dede0202 on The Pirate Bay infringes copyright, High Court decides
Sungwoo

do You know that? it can install 4G Ram. So i buy 4g and install It work! I can run call of duty 4,6,7 [Modern war... 1,2,3] Call of duty 1 was...

8 hours ago by Sungwoo on Loose Ends - Upgrading the Aspire One 522
itsajob

2. Bad idea. Making up patch cables loses you your commission from the cable supplier. 3. If you tidy up, other people can understand where the...

14 hours ago by itsajob on Ten IT jobs to save up for those rare lulls
Roberto_Store

Now On Sale, Unlocked iPhone 4S / Galaxy Note In Factory Box. Roberto-Techie(UK) ”Now on Sales” Smartphone, Android,Tablets,Gadget &...

17 hours ago by Roberto_Store on Samsung Galaxy S III lined up for sale
Paul Smyth

Is this classic FUD? One thing I would definitely have notice is a Mozilla threat to stop supporting GNU/Linux.

19 hours ago by Paul Smyth via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

23 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

1 day ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

1 day ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

2 days ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

2 days ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

2 days ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

2 days ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

2 days ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

2 days ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

2 days ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

3 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

3 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

3 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround