PREVIEW
Microsoft has released Windows Vista Beta 1 (formerly known as Windows Longhorn) to a select group of testers. Microsoft's mantra (or advertising line) for Windows Vista is 'Confidence, clarity, and connection'. For you and me, that means a promise of greater stability and security within the OS, better graphics throughout, and an enhanced ability to share documents and files, including built-in P2P services.
The Beta 1 build is a programmers' build -- that is, Microsoft wants to make sure that developers know how the new OS works before they put the finishing touches on the overall look and feel of Windows Vista. A second beta is expected by the end of 2005. Final shipping of the new Windows operating system won't occur until the second half of 2006.
In Windows Vista, Microsoft borrows a lot of clever ideas from its competitors. Borrowing from Linux, Windows Vista runs all users at a Standard user level and creates a separate Administrator login, so even if you are the only user of the OS, you will still need to log in with Administrator privileges to do high-level work, such as changing the status of hidden or read-only files. Standard users should still be able to install and uninstall applications, provided they know the password for Administrator privileges. This extra effort should minimise the occurrence of spyware installing without your knowledge and remote-access exploits from taking control of your computer.
Borrowing from Apple Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Windows Vista incorporates enhanced desktop search features throughout its new OS. You can search from the Windows Start menu or within applications, and you can also search within the new version of Internet Explorer 7.0. Also borrowing from Apple, Windows Vista does away with traditional file folders and allows you to 'stack' related documents together. These virtual files can exist independent of where the actual file resides on the hard drive.
When you open or save a file, you can also change its metadata on the fly. Note the file path at the top -- no more slashes.
We especially like the fact that you can both see and alter a file's metadata whenever you open or save a document. The metadata is important because Windows Vista uses metadata to index files. Better yet, say you want to drag and drop a file from one stack (pictures of France) to another (pictures of me); the metadata is automatically changed once the file is relocated.
Addressing its own past mistakes, Microsoft has changed the way some drivers operate within the new OS. For example, a leading cause of the dreaded Blue Screen of Death (system crash) is printer drivers, which have historically been installed at the kernel level of the OS. With Windows Vista, printers will be installed only at the user level -- thus, if a printer driver has a problem, you will be informed, but the system won't crash as a result.
Microsoft also swears that it is scanning every line of code within Windows Vista, aiming to reduce the number of patches by 50 percent within the first 90 days of release, compared to the XP release. Unfortunately, the new ability for the Windows Vista firewall to stop malicious activity both inbound and outbound will not be enabled by default. We don't understand this decision, although Microsoft insists that it's better not to enable two-way firewall protection right out of the box. So, to protect yourself from aggressive spyware, we recommend you either go into the Control Panel and activate the two-way firewall option yourself or disable the Windows Vista firewall entirely and install a third-party firewall. Another option is to enroll in the new OneCare service from Microsoft (also in beta at this writing); subscribers to OneCare will automatically have two-way firewall protection enabled.
We'd like to see several interface changes, as well. For example, right now, if you have more than two applications open on the desktop, the status bar shows only one, with up and down arrows. Instead of chaining icons for the various open programs across the bottom of the desktop, you'll have to scroll. In informal testing, we found ourselves opening several instances of Internet Explorer and Notepad because it was easy to forget they were already open.
It's too early to say how successful Windows Vista will be. Windows XP hasn't swept the world after four years (there are millions of people still using Windows 98 SE, for example), and in the corporate space, Windows 2000 remains the preferred environment, despite Microsoft's many attempts to discontinue support of Windows 2000. Check back at the end of 2005 to read about how the second beta performs.
Talkback
A couple of quick comments regarding XP having not 'swept the world'.
Remember the days when we were setting up Windows 98SE on our machines? In my opinion it was an OS that was fine when you could install it and 'get it running stable'. Merely OK in comparison to XP, it was fragile as anything, and took very little for it to fall over, but it was the best of a bad bunch (Windows ME, anyone?).
Windows 2000 is absolutely fine for the corporate world. It's stable and robust. It's Windows XP without fancy graphics, with less multimedia capability (WMP10, etc.), so it's exactly what many administrators and business users want!
As many of us go by the wise saying 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it', we often aren't in a rush to do a full reinstall with a new operating system and drivers, just because a new one came out. Add this to the fact that there are only a small and shrinking proportion of us that are even techies! Most Windows users are ordinary folk that wouldn't have a clue how to install an operating system, or even know what one was. If their computer is working, that's all they need.
XP is a very good, if not very natively secure, OS. But looking at the normal behaviour of the computer using world shows us why there are still many machines running 98SE and 2000.
" Windows 2000 remains the preferred environment, despite Microsoft's many attempts to discontinue support of Windows 2000."
I'm interested in these "many attempts to discontinue support of Windows 2000". How, exactly, has Microsoft attempted to discontinue support? Is it those Service Packs they've been releasing? The security updates? What tipped you off that they were unsuccessfully trying to discontinue support?
Poor Microsoft. You'd think they could discontinue support of one of their own products any time they cared to...
"What tipped you off that they were unsuccessfully trying to discontinue support?"
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. Hence, you are witless.
Longhorn cheddar cheese> Kraft Velveeta American processed cheese product ("Asta la Veestah (Vista)". mBaybe> vestibule)
Ahnold Says: "Exactly."
I like the UK ZDnet's style compared to the US .com version, as usual the US site has loads of stupid grphics and video and pictures and horrible accents.
But when images are shown on the UK site why are they shown so small, with no choice of an enlarged version, and a GIF!!
This is very annoying and I for one hope in future that when, on the rare occasions, ZDnet UK decide to include pictures in their articles they are big 1024*768 ones
Yes Windows Vista will be the greatest ever. Again. Like everything Redmond before it. Bleed, sweat and cry again because this time, really, promise, everything will be as it should be in everyone's eyes. And look, it has new cool gadgets, let's really focus on that.
Only thing left to do is to kill all those third-party vendors because they'll be the ones demanding from their customers to change security setting this and functionality setting there just to get their applications up and running again. So place all your eggs in one basket and be convinced that one size fits all. Hopefully Microsoft will buy up some printer company soon and get that also sorted out.
Because all these problems with various Windows versions are ofcourse caused by users, administrators, hackers, crackers, illegal software, crappy third party drivers, bad designed third party software, anything and everything but a flawed and bloated technical design with plenty of undocumented features lead by a PR minded brass right from the get go that's still the basis of it all.
Yes, if your car keeps breaking down then ofcourse the best thing to do is to ask the sales man what to do about it again and again rather then asking a true independant and multi-vendor experienced car mechanic that happens to have the right tools. At least your car will be mucho bling-bling then. If it's reliable is another matter but you know the golden rule of how to deal with strange and worrying sounds coming from your company car: turn up the volume until you don't hear those sounds. Hey, quick and easy fix and much more cheaper and faster then some serious overhauling. Right?
Sometime they must get it right is what some believe. Right, wonder what motivated you to buy into all those upgrades and patches so far. Hmmm, there's a business strategy for you.
I wonder what happened to the principel of simplicity, transparency and sound engineering. It must have been lost and lost again starting the mid 80's or so.
The guy who posted second is a bit thick.
""What tipped you off that they were unsuccessfully trying to discontinue support?""
just the fact that microsoft no longer support it except for EXTENDED only support. give it till next year or so and it will be "windows two what?"
Well, Something bother me : if they "borrow" so much stuff to Linux and Mac OS X, why don't take the original, which has a lot more experience dealing with that ? I think it should be wise to wait a little more...
(Well, for me, I still use 'older' versions of it : DOS 7.10 (in GPL !!) and Windows 98 ; ok, that's just for playing video games since I have Debian and Mandrake LE, too... But I'd rather use WinLSD or XP pro than a brand new one, which will probably stay in a kind of unfinished state for a certain time, like some other products : look at Win98 (with the SE) and WinXP (with SP1, SP2,...))
Vista is just a mix of concepts and ideas borrowed from competitors; repackaged in a glossier interface and a Microsoft label on top. The common tasks and different file location vs physical location are all from Apple.
What's bad is that Microsoft will tout this as an innovation. And, Microsoft appears to concentrate more on the Graphics of software. This makes the system more unstable as your computer struggles to show the Start bar fade in, rather than launching a program faster.
XP is merely a skinned version of the previous Windows editions. True, it is much more stable than previous versions of Windows (it still crashes, as is the rule for all Microsoft products). It's also got better user management and integrated file compression. Beyond that? Nothing!
Oh, you could consider:
Glossier icons everywhere
Color gradients and effects in programs
Shadows under menus.
A dog to search for your files
Skinnable XP
I agree to what the previous guy said about vista being a mixture of ideas from older OSes; i use suse linux 9.3 professional and its rulz!
I might also dual boot my comp with win2k3 since i prefer it over xp (cos its more like win2k) :)
but mainly cos i need it for doing my college work at home (college dont use linux) :(
Windows ME is very cool!!!
Will it be Stable and user friendly,As some in the past have been a nightmare..
Yeah!
Windows Sucks!!
I only doubt that it doesnt turn up to be a rich graphics, media friendly o/s with a weak core.
Uptill now not much has been told about its performance details and robustness.
There has been information only about its gr8 graphics and nice media playing capabilities. what about the real thing at its core?
how efficient? how robust?
Micorsoft does it again with the new Vista! A new less than optimal version of Mac OS X Tiger. Keep trying Microsoft!
personnaly i like sheperds pie with a glass of milk.
As long as ERROR REPORTING causes hours of lost work, Apple is the productive choice!