Norton AntiVirus (NAV) 2004 debuts with a promising pedigree. Previous versions have consistently led the anti-virus pack in security innovations, being the first, for example, to scan instant-messaging attachments as well as inbound and outbound email. The program routinely receives high marks from independent anti-virus testing laboratories. Its interface is easy for beginners to navigate, yet it offers advanced users plenty of scanning options. The 2004 version continues the traditions (including some we don't like, namely the fee-based phone support), but it adds an imperfect anti-spyware feature. NAV 2004 is a solid program for first-time anti-virus users, but its half-hearted enhancements make it a questionable £29.99 (inc. VAT) upgrade for existing users.
EDITORS' NOTE: see this comment article for an update on NAV 2004.
Setup & interface
Norton AntiVirus 2004 offers the option of a pre-installation virus scan, an added protection measure not matched by its leading competitor, McAfee’s VirusScan 8.0. This procedure adds a lot of time to the setup process, however -- 30 minutes on our test PC. Users with time constraints may wish to bypass it (NAV does an automatic postinstall, scan, too).
The program froze during our first install attempt, but it ran perfectly once we rebooted. NAV 2004 supports Windows 98 through XP and requires a slightly larger amount of drive space than previous versions -- from 85MB to 125MB, depending on the OS version.
After setup is completed, NAV connects automatically to Symantec's Web server to download the latest virus definitions. NAV 2004 users get a year of free definitions, after which the annual fee is £13.81. Symantec has also added an activation process similar to that used by Microsoft in Windows XP, although we found this to be a painless extra step.
NAV 2004's well-designed interface changes little from its predecessor's. The main screen presents a snapshot of your PC's security, with red or yellow icons marking items that need attention, such as outdated virus definitions. Default settings provide strong security by automatically deleting viruses and scanning compressed ZIP files, as well as stopping spyware and Trojans from infecting your PC. Popular options, such as scheduling automatic scans, are easily accessible.
Features
NAV 2004 adds two major capabilities. First is its enhanced detection of compressed files. Previous versions of NAV detected viruses embedded in ZIP and other compressed formats during manual scans. NAV 2004's real-time scanner finds and deletes these hidden viruses on the fly -- as they are being downloaded, for example -- adding another layer of protection.
NAV 2004's second new feature is the ability to detect and destroy spyware, adware and hacking tools that may be lurking on your hard drive. NAV 2004 is the first anti-virus application to include this feature. However, the free standalone utilities, such as Lavasoft's Ad-aware and PepiMK’s Spybot Search & Destroy, ferret out these same annoyances much better. For example, in our tests, NAV 2004 failed to find a malware component uncovered by Ad-aware 6.0 in a follow-up scan (we ran Ad-aware immediately after the completion of a Norton system scan).
Performance
In our tests, NAV 2004 caused a 4 percent drag on our test system's performance. McAfee VirusScan 8.0, on the other hand, produced no perceptible drag. But NAV 2004 scanned our 1GB drive much faster than McAfee did. Here are our test results in full:
| Norton AntiVirus 2004 v Mcafee VirusScan 8.0 |
|
|
Test system
|
Norton AntiVirus 2004
|
McAfee VirusScan 8.0
|
|
| SysMark2002 Internet-content-creation (ICC) score |
233 |
223 |
234 |
| Normalised score |
100 |
96 |
100 |
| Percentage degradation |
n/a |
4 |
0 |
| Average boot time (s) |
40.8 |
52.72 |
48.38 |
| Scan 1GB directory; average scan time (m) |
n/a |
3.59 |
4.75 |
|
Norton AntiVirus has been tested on Windows systems six times since 2000 by the independent testing organisation VirusBulletin and earned its coveted VB 100 percent title each time. By comparison, McAfee's VirusScan has been tested and earned a VB 100 percent title only once. However, it's hard to draw any meaningful conclusions from such limited data. Previous versions of Norton AntiVirus have also been certified by the independent anti-virus testing laboratories at West Coast Checkmark, ICSA Labs and AV-test.org.
Service & support
Like McAfee, unfortunately, Symantec charges for its live technical support via phone -- £18 per incident. We tried the free alternative: email. The form was hard to locate, but representatives were responsive, answering within 24 to 48 hours. Unfortunately, Norton does not offer technical support via online chat, a feature that McAfee offers (with mixed results) for its VirusScan customers. The Automated Support Assistant, another feature accessible via the support site, is a convenient way to download product upgrades and keep your copy of NAV 2004 up-to-date. Symantec's free online knowledge base is a helpful do-it-yourself resource.
Member reviews
During initial installation, the software froze and the monitor shut down, leaving the PCU running. When I rebooted NAV had errors, had to uninstall and reinstall. Poor spyware program and very sluggish on System resources. It is now the last program to load after ZoneAlarm and SS5.
- 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10I work as a computer tech. So far I have installed 2004 6 times: 4 had some problems, one had minor problems, and one killed the computer. The one that got killed is now being upgraded to WinXP from ME because after installing 2004, the system was unusable and not repairable.
- 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10After using Norton for years successfully I decided to try NAV 2004. What a diaster! It refused to register online and I couldn't go back to NAV 2003. it totally messed up my system. I will now purchase a competitor's software.
- 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 101. Spyware features don't work at all. Norton found 6, Ad-aware found 617! Yes 617!
2. Script features don't work. MS Baseline Security Analyzer (free) found running malicious script. Norton didn't.
3. Tech support at half the cost of the product per call (and you still have a half hour wait)? For installation problems? No thanks.
- 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10Slowed my pc to a crawl. I have a 56Kbps modem connection and frequently don't wish to log onto the Web to work at my PC. But this crock just keeps on attempting to dial in even with automatic update and load on startup disabled. On line help is a waste; the manual says I can 'post a question to an online technical support representative' -- NOT! Just an automated answer saying my system is working correctly!. And they have the cheek to charge £18 for a phone call! Will not buy Norton again.
- 4.00 out of 10
4.00 out of 10NAV 2004 cannot detect and remove spywares like Gator, GMT and GAIN. Why does Symantec include this anti-spyware thing if it's not even an average performer. Don't they have QAs to test their product? Slow installation and scanning. Time is valuable so it must be used sensibly. The Tech Support sucks! Symantec now pioneered another thing..that is PAY for SUPPORT and the SUPPORT people will send useless mail details. That's another word for "I'll help you, but pay first".
- 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10After contacting NAV, online (Symantec) three times, they were not able to find a solution to the installation problems I encountered, even though I had satisfactorily installed 2003 and 2003 NAV.
- 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10The activation is poor and causes installation problems. The scanning is faster than McAfee VirusScan 8.0.
- 7.00 out of 10
7.00 out of 10...and an unbelievable slow-down of the system occurs too (PIII/500/256MB)
- 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10Can you please test software with 'average' hardware, as well as latest spec...
I have been using Sophos and Zone Alarm Pro on my Compaq armada m700 (PIII 850MHz) for a couple of years with NO problems, but when I left the company I bought the laptop and installed Norton Internet Security 2004. The machine has ground to a halt... it takes 4 minutes to start, and seems slow even running Office.. I also HATE the fact that the install notes say: "Some Internet Service Providers (ISPs) scan subscribers' computers to see if they are running Web or FTP servers. This may trigger the AutoBlock feature and prevent you from accessing the Internet." THATS IT! NO advice how to get round it -- so you buy a product for safe surfing and it prevents you getting on the Internet? MAD!
- 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10