Norton AntiVirus 2004

NAV 2004 is still a good choice for first timers, but its minor improvements mean that NAV 2003 users need not upgrade.… Read full review

Typical price: £44

Pros

  • New protection against spyware and adware
  • improved scanning of compressed files
  • well-designed interface.

Cons

  • Minor improvements over 2003 version
  • Anti-spyware feature is imperfect.

Norton AntiVirus (NAV) 2004 debuts with a promising pedigree. Previous versions have consistently led the anti-virus pack in security innovations, being the first, for example, to scan instant-messaging attachments as well as inbound and outbound email. The program routinely receives high marks from independent anti-virus testing laboratories. Its interface is easy for beginners to navigate, yet it offers advanced users plenty of scanning options. The 2004 version continues the traditions (including some we don't like, namely the fee-based phone support), but it adds an imperfect anti-spyware feature. NAV 2004 is a solid program for first-time anti-virus users, but its half-hearted enhancements make it a questionable £29.99 (inc. VAT) upgrade for existing users.

EDITORS' NOTE: see this comment article for an update on NAV 2004.

Setup & interface
Norton AntiVirus 2004 offers the option of a pre-installation virus scan, an added protection measure not matched by its leading competitor, McAfee’s VirusScan 8.0. This procedure adds a lot of time to the setup process, however -- 30 minutes on our test PC. Users with time constraints may wish to bypass it (NAV does an automatic postinstall, scan, too). The program froze during our first install attempt, but it ran perfectly once we rebooted. NAV 2004 supports Windows 98 through XP and requires a slightly larger amount of drive space than previous versions -- from 85MB to 125MB, depending on the OS version. After setup is completed, NAV connects automatically to Symantec's Web server to download the latest virus definitions. NAV 2004 users get a year of free definitions, after which the annual fee is £13.81. Symantec has also added an activation process similar to that used by Microsoft in Windows XP, although we found this to be a painless extra step. NAV 2004's well-designed interface changes little from its predecessor's. The main screen presents a snapshot of your PC's security, with red or yellow icons marking items that need attention, such as outdated virus definitions. Default settings provide strong security by automatically deleting viruses and scanning compressed ZIP files, as well as stopping spyware and Trojans from infecting your PC. Popular options, such as scheduling automatic scans, are easily accessible.

Features
NAV 2004 adds two major capabilities. First is its enhanced detection of compressed files. Previous versions of NAV detected viruses embedded in ZIP and other compressed formats during manual scans. NAV 2004's real-time scanner finds and deletes these hidden viruses on the fly -- as they are being downloaded, for example -- adding another layer of protection. NAV 2004's second new feature is the ability to detect and destroy spyware, adware and hacking tools that may be lurking on your hard drive. NAV 2004 is the first anti-virus application to include this feature. However, the free standalone utilities, such as Lavasoft's Ad-aware and PepiMK’s Spybot Search & Destroy, ferret out these same annoyances much better. For example, in our tests, NAV 2004 failed to find a malware component uncovered by Ad-aware 6.0 in a follow-up scan (we ran Ad-aware immediately after the completion of a Norton system scan).

Performance
In our tests, NAV 2004 caused a 4 percent drag on our test system's performance. McAfee VirusScan 8.0, on the other hand, produced no perceptible drag. But NAV 2004 scanned our 1GB drive much faster than McAfee did. Here are our test results in full:

Norton AntiVirus 2004 v Mcafee VirusScan 8.0


Test system
Norton AntiVirus 2004
McAfee VirusScan 8.0

SysMark2002 Internet-content-creation (ICC) score 233 223 234
Normalised score 100 96 100
Percentage degradation n/a 4 0
Average boot time (s) 40.8 52.72 48.38
Scan 1GB directory; average scan time (m) n/a 3.59 4.75

Norton AntiVirus has been tested on Windows systems six times since 2000 by the independent testing organisation VirusBulletin and earned its coveted VB 100 percent title each time. By comparison, McAfee's VirusScan has been tested and earned a VB 100 percent title only once. However, it's hard to draw any meaningful conclusions from such limited data. Previous versions of Norton AntiVirus have also been certified by the independent anti-virus testing laboratories at West Coast Checkmark, ICSA Labs and AV-test.org.

Service & support
Like McAfee, unfortunately, Symantec charges for its live technical support via phone -- £18 per incident. We tried the free alternative: email. The form was hard to locate, but representatives were responsive, answering within 24 to 48 hours. Unfortunately, Norton does not offer technical support via online chat, a feature that McAfee offers (with mixed results) for its VirusScan customers. The Automated Support Assistant, another feature accessible via the support site, is a convenient way to download product upgrades and keep your copy of NAV 2004 up-to-date. Symantec's free online knowledge base is a helpful do-it-yourself resource.

Related stories

Member reviews

During initial installation, the software froze and the monitor shut down, leaving the PCU running. When I rebooted NAV had errors, had to uninstall and reinstall. Poor spyware program and very sluggish on System resources. It is now the last program to load after ZoneAlarm and SS5.

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
Reply 2 Oct 03 16:36 Reply

I work as a computer tech. So far I have installed 2004 6 times: 4 had some problems, one had minor problems, and one killed the computer. The one that got killed is now being upgraded to WinXP from ME because after installing 2004, the system was unusable and not repairable.

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
Reply 9 Oct 03 22:06 Reply

After using Norton for years successfully I decided to try NAV 2004. What a diaster! It refused to register online and I couldn't go back to NAV 2003. it totally messed up my system. I will now purchase a competitor's software.

Member's rating:
  • 4.50 out of 10
4.50 out of 10
Reply 17 Oct 03 13:46 Reply

1. Spyware features don't work at all. Norton found 6, Ad-aware found 617! Yes 617!
2. Script features don't work. MS Baseline Security Analyzer (free) found running malicious script. Norton didn't.
3. Tech support at half the cost of the product per call (and you still have a half hour wait)? For installation problems? No thanks.

Member's rating:
  • 2.50 out of 10
2.50 out of 10
Reply 20 Oct 03 10:05 Reply

Slowed my pc to a crawl. I have a 56Kbps modem connection and frequently don't wish to log onto the Web to work at my PC. But this crock just keeps on attempting to dial in even with automatic update and load on startup disabled. On line help is a waste; the manual says I can 'post a question to an online technical support representative' -- NOT! Just an automated answer saying my system is working correctly!. And they have the cheek to charge £18 for a phone call! Will not buy Norton again.

Member's rating:
  • 4.00 out of 10
4.00 out of 10
Reply 21 Oct 03 11:02 Reply

NAV 2004 cannot detect and remove spywares like Gator, GMT and GAIN. Why does Symantec include this anti-spyware thing if it's not even an average performer. Don't they have QAs to test their product? Slow installation and scanning. Time is valuable so it must be used sensibly. The Tech Support sucks! Symantec now pioneered another thing..that is PAY for SUPPORT and the SUPPORT people will send useless mail details. That's another word for "I'll help you, but pay first".

Member's rating:
  • 5.50 out of 10
5.50 out of 10
Reply 7 Nov 03 08:53 Reply

After contacting NAV, online (Symantec) three times, they were not able to find a solution to the installation problems I encountered, even though I had satisfactorily installed 2003 and 2003 NAV.

Member's rating:
  • 3.50 out of 10
3.50 out of 10
Reply 18 Nov 03 17:54 Reply

The activation is poor and causes installation problems. The scanning is faster than McAfee VirusScan 8.0.

Member's rating:
  • 7.00 out of 10
7.00 out of 10
Reply 25 Nov 03 01:51 Reply

...and an unbelievable slow-down of the system occurs too (PIII/500/256MB)

Member's rating:
  • 5.00 out of 10
5.00 out of 10
Reply 29 Nov 03 03:25 Reply

Can you please test software with 'average' hardware, as well as latest spec...

I have been using Sophos and Zone Alarm Pro on my Compaq armada m700 (PIII 850MHz) for a couple of years with NO problems, but when I left the company I bought the laptop and installed Norton Internet Security 2004. The machine has ground to a halt... it takes 4 minutes to start, and seems slow even running Office.. I also HATE the fact that the install notes say: "Some Internet Service Providers (ISPs) scan subscribers' computers to see if they are running Web or FTP servers. This may trigger the AutoBlock feature and prevent you from accessing the Internet." THATS IT! NO advice how to get round it -- so you buy a product for safe surfing and it prevents you getting on the Internet? MAD!

Member's rating:
  • 2.00 out of 10
2.00 out of 10
Reply 1 Dec 03 18:44 Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in

Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

roger andre

There are some really good people in Microsoft and I wonder, how embarassing it must be for them to see how the organisation behaves from it's...

4 hours ago by roger andre on Microsoft lashing out at Linux, open source
ladygaga99

Lady Gaga we love you Gaga rama rama!

4 hours ago by ladygaga99 on News Burst: Yahoo! moves 'adult' IM chat rooms
nuknuk21

hey honey

5 hours ago by nuknuk21 on News Burst: Yahoo! moves 'adult' IM chat rooms
nuknuk21

darryl

5 hours ago by nuknuk21 on News Burst: Yahoo! moves 'adult' IM chat rooms
ajclarke

Great new look for ZDNET UK web-site http://bit.ly/9R5eAA to check it out @ZDNetUK #zdnet

feedfrog

Microsoft previews Internet Explorer 9 with HTML 5 support - zdnet.co.uk http://bit.ly/9FSh23

kencogold

We were just pondering on when IE will get HTML5 and CSS3 onboard! this is excellent

9 hours ago by kencogold on Microsoft previews Internet Explorer 9 with HTML 5 support
riptari

RT @suziedaniels: relaunched www.zdnet.co.uk raises the bar yet again! its so fast it makes my eyes bleed.

Bob Preece

This is brilliant - I borrowed one and straight away saw that a few AP`s were set up to the wrong country. It gives interference levels on each...

10 hours ago by Bob Preece on Fluke Networks AirCheck Wi-Fi Tester
_SimonArnoldme

http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/networking/2010/03/11/european-parliament-votes-down-acta-treaty-40085614/ (Where does this leave #Debill?)

suziedaniels

relaunched www.zdnet.co.uk raises the bar yet again! its so fast it makes my eyes bleed.

eparody

Redesign complet pour ZDNet UK et AU, Twitter au centre http://www.zdnet.co.uk/ http://www.zdnet.com.au/

cdutheil

RT @eparody: Redesign complet pour ZDNet UK et AU, Twitter au centre http://www.zdnet.co.uk/ http://www.zdnet.com.au/

ABridgwater

I just joined the ZDNetUK LinkedIn group http://bit.ly/aGgPhc

gerardv

Sharepoint 2010 in photo's http://www.zdnet.co.uk/reviews/communication-and-collaboration/2010/03/04/sharepoint-2010-screenshots-40070577/

David Meyer

Thanks for commenting and clearing that up, Richard. We look forward to seeing what the new clause, if it is not struck out due to protests and/or...

13 hours ago by David Meyer on Rights holders vs digital rights activists - who wins?
RMollet

Thanks Subliminal: I'm afraid I did, but a slip of the tongue in the heat of the moment - I meant to say it would have the opposite of an...

13 hours ago by RMollet on Rights holders vs digital rights activists - who wins?
westcoastfan32

the new look and feel ZDNET, with seriously fast search for better navigation www.zdnet.co.uk

pdub

RT @jay_ro: Loving the new site and unified design! www.zdnet.com.au (also www.zdnetasia.com and www.zdnet.co.uk) /via @pastawoua

cankles

ZDNet Australia, Asia and UK re-launch on a unified platform - looking good. www.zdnet.com.au www.zdnetasia.com www.zdnet.co.uk

Featured white papers

Achieving PCI Compliance for:Privileged Password Management & Remote Vendor Access

For multi-store outlets, including retail, banking, grocery, gas, hospitality, convenience stores and others, reducing (or avoiding) the cost of in-store system support and maintenance while maintaining compliance with PCI and other requirements has become a strategic challenge.

Download now

Web 2.0 Security Threats: How to Protect Your Enterprise Network

Speaker: Dr. Chenxi Wang, Principal Analyst, Security and Risk Management, Forrester Research, Inc. As Enterprises are increasingly connected to the Internet and as hard organizational boundaries are fast disappearing, security professionals are facing fresh challenges in Enterprise computing.

Download now

MindManager - Tutorial for New Users - Short

This tutorial is for new MindManager users and teaches you how to get started, by creating maps, reading maps and organizing your information.

Download now