Previous
Apple Mac OS X Tiger: a first look
Talkback OS X has always been a little slow to navigate through compared with windows and hopefully Tiger will be improved upon in that issue. What I hate, is the fact that they have to constantly come out with new "major releases" every year and make...
[March 16, 2005, 3:53]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Tired-of-Whining. I must've been unclear. Obviously you should be able to replace a hard drive. That's the whole point. My logic is that if people complain about computer support/stability issues, they must not know how to fix it.
[November 11, 2005, 4:25]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Where did he get a copy of the OS? Couple of questions need to be asked here. Is it legitimate, if not then the installer put themselves in one heck of a place for a piracy.
[June 1, 2006, 17:11]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback And thus when Mac began using the IBM manufactured PowerPC chip back in the 90's I was probably the only one disgusted and crying: "Hypocracy! Thus, I breath easier now that Intel is in a Mac. I for one have never liked IBM hardware.
[January 11, 2006, 19:57]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Funny how all of the Windows and Mac OS users are at each other throats. OSX isn't even really it's own OS anymore IT'S A PRETTY FACE ON A REAL OS. BSD UNIX! Everyone grow up buy ANY PC that does your job and live with it.
[January 5, 2006, 5:37]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Most non-computer enthusiasts feel more comfortable using the same OS at home as they use at work, one of the many reasons that Windows is so popular. The handful of applications that run on a current Mac work wonderfully!
[January 4, 2006, 17:12]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Where mac employ developers to build good operating systems that are stable GATES releases systems for genera use and lets the public BETA test it for him which he then corrects at will, when enough faults are discovered he changes versions WAKE...
[December 31, 2005, 13:30]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Anti-virus for the Mac? I could go on forever about the costs involved in Microsoft Licensing practices for business users vs that of Apple's, cheap components placed in PC workstations just to get them to that $499 price tag, losses due to...
[December 10, 2005, 17:45]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback What is with all the negative comments. This review was commentary. There was a big flag that said.this is on pre-release software! The review was fair. Based on this build the performance is decent and the PPC optimized apps run slowly under...
[November 11, 2005, 5:49]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Anyone who says that the average cheap PC and the average Mac are the same is drunk. I have a Mac. My logic is that if people complain about computer support/stability issues, they must not know how to fix it.
[November 11, 2005, 6:04]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback People who have a Mac have ONE COMPANY to call: Apple. Comment:------------ Look for complaints about Apple support, especially problems getting satisfaction under AppleCare warranties, and you will find many, many, unhappy people.
[November 11, 2005, 6:17]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Basically the Mac OS does not need the same kind of processing power to get the same job done. OS X may be slower in certain avenues, such as copying Discs. Because of the OS. Listen, in my opinion, either camp (Windows and Mac) have their advantages.
[November 11, 2005, 9:18]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Jobs is continuing to trsh traditional Mac enthusiasts with his move to Intel processors. AMD would have made sense but Intel, with its history of shady dealings (with OEM customers) and its inclination to allow gov trashing of privacy as a build...
[December 17, 2005, 9:20]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback This article reads like a review of a warez product. It sickens me to see such blatant disregard of legal and moral standards, and for no demonstrable purpose at all. Ethically, it just blows my mind: What you have deigned to do is illegal, and for...
[November 11, 2005, 10:26]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback : D Okay, I give up! FUD, you said I couldn't install a hard drive; that's the ONLY reason I mentioned building my own PC. I didn't realize in the 1st post that I had to defend my 1337-ness to share an opinion, and therefor corrected myself.
[November 11, 2005, 12:00]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback I'd love to ditch windows on my laptop and use MAC OSX. Where can I get hold of the operating system for Intel Machines?
[November 11, 2005, 12:03]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback If someone could please answer this for me it would be much appreciated but why did Apple go with Intel? I can understand it in the short term with the IBM PPC chip coming under fire from Intel and their reluctance to solve the heat problem G5...
[December 2, 2005, 12:04]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback In my opinion this is good try for a PC user. Next step would be buy a Powerbook G4 notebook and become happy with life.
[November 14, 2005, 11:45]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback I am very much IMPRESSED by the speed of iTunes under Rosetta! Several other people have already said this was an inaccurate comparison since iTunes is not a native application yet. It is therefore completely normal that it is slower.
[November 14, 2005, 10:07]
