Toolkit
Story: AMD Athlon 64: the benchmarks
Posted by: Ultima (Saturday 27 September 2003, 2:44 PM)
WOW! You seem all hyped up for no reason. ZDNet gets their benchmarks from a faulty source. Plus they only used 4 processors: the benchmarks I saw used 6. I'm not saying AMD sucks because I hate Pentium, but the new Pentiums kind of own the AMD's without having 64 lines.
Full Talkback thread
Story: AMD Athlon 64: the benchmarks
-
It would have been nice to see some sort of compar... Anonymous -
Come on industry - AMD has a serious product that... Carl White
-
WOW! You seem all hyped up for no reason. ZDNet ge... Ultima -
This is all fine for the graphics and gaming indus... Andy
-
These are 32 bit bench marks. Why don't you get a... Jerome Davies
-
AMD once again proves that GHz is not everything.... Vassilis Perantzakis
-
I purchased an Athlon 64 and Asus k8v motherboard.... bendopp
-
I've always been an 'Intel person'... but for the... Anonymous
-
I have always hated intel, this is not due to the... allen kost
-
More than any other application - its High Perform... Anonymous
-
Wow! Just purchased AMD's Athlon 64 3200+
I've nev... Anonymous
-
Oh well, did this come as a bit of a surprise to m... Rupak
-
Ibought an Athlon 64 in the LIDL store on Thursday... oliver burns
-
i read somewhere that the athlon 64 when not in us... Anonymous
-
the amd athlon 64 is designed for 64 bit usage not... Anonymous
-
Athlon 64's are superior to Intel's in just about... Apokalipse
Back to: AMD Athlon 64: the benchmarks
