Toolkit
Story: Attackers take down SCO site again
Posted by: Anonymous (Thursday 11 December 2003, 4:13 PM)
SCO contradicts themselves. They claimed the attack was both a syn flood and a page request flood at the same time. This technically can't happen because if it's a syb flood then page requests would not be getting through enough to be a flood.
When a company like SCO, who's record of FUD is well known, any 'facts' they claim should first be researched.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Attackers take down SCO site again
-
I wish ZDnet reported would do some checking, i th... ian -
Some serious questions have been raised about
SCO'... Anonymous
-
Please in every case when in receipt of SCO press... Peter Garrett
-
Please see http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor... Anonymous
-
What a bunch of boobs at SCO !! And they claim to... Anonymous
-
Their ftp server is still accessible (even though... Jaime F Moraga
-
Why did you take SCO's word on this?
There is over... Bill Harlan
-
You people should really try to do a little resear... Anonymous
-
SCO contradicts themselves. They claimed the attac... Anonymous -
Does any reporter ever check their facts these day... Frank Earl
-
You know what I want to say: Bob go do your homewo... pierre van der riet
-
Take a look at this link:
http://uptime.netcraft.c... Scott Marlowe
Back to: Attackers take down SCO site again
