Toolkit

Story: SCO keeps disputed code secret

• 
• 

I don't understand. If, as SCO claim, their code has been copied into Linux then how can any code they show in court "be secret"?

Obviously, they are doing this to prevent any infringing code from being removed. Legally, they should give the offender an opportunity to stop offending.

Now, if the copying is significant, what are they worried about? If the copying really is the fundamental foundations of enterprise computing, how can it be removed?

I can only assume that it isn't fundamental to anything (if it exists at all) and could be easily remedied (if a remedy is required).

Yet another heavily spun press release by Mr Stowell. Why is it, that articles appearing in the press rely on commentary provided by readers?

• 
• 

• 
• 
• 

Full Talkback thread