Toolkit
Story: SCO keeps disputed code secret
Posted by: Anonymous (Tuesday 16 December 2003, 3:49 PM)
More proof of lazy journalism, when the writer bases his conclussions on a company's PR materials. If Mr. Colley wanted to do a bit more digging, he could head over to Groklaw.net, which has become the definitive website for examining the truth behind the press releases of SCO. Blake Stowell and Darl McBride have not proven that they are worthy of trust (quite the opposite), and any journalist that accepts their statements at face value is not earning my trust either.
Full Talkback thread
Story: SCO keeps disputed code secret
-
It's too bad SCO is full of crap. We might be incl... Anonymous -
Typical! From what I've also read on Gartner (?) b... Anonymous
-
I don't understand. If, as SCO claim, their code h... Tony McConnell
-
More proof of lazy journalism, when the writer bas... Anonymous -
How about releasing file, version and line numbers... Richard Corfield
-
Articles like these are amusing:
1. SCO owns only... Anonymous
-
Has the author of this report bothered to check th... Robert Pogson
-
This could prevent IBM from having the resources o... Roy Rezabek
-
It's their IP and that's why they don't want to re... Anco Haaima
-
What a load of BS!
The code is out there, it is pa... Chris Anckaert
-
A million lines of code shown only in a closed cou... Anonymous
-
I read your article with continued amazement and... Anonymous
-
There is a great observation about the SCO IBM la... Emery Jeffreys
-
It's not worrisome that SCO haven't revealed copyr... Rob Levin
-
I would like to see IBM do a hostile take over of... Anonymous
-
Someone didn't get it. SCO is a dying rat who is... Anonymous
-
Some good points here - especially common sense te... Anonymous
Back to: SCO keeps disputed code secret
