Toolkit
Story: 2004: The year of desktop Linux?
Posted by: Tom Russell (Saturday 3 January 2004, 12:17 PM)
When Unix replaced Mainframes, didn't everything have to rewritten?
When 64bit replaces 32bit wont everything have to rewritten?
When 64bit has 100GB of RAM what then? Which of today's applications will be relevant? How many of today's desktop workers will be needed?
If Linux is mostly free how does IDC count desktops?
If MS is losing enough market share to make its quarterly profit flat, who has gained?
Full Talkback thread
Story: 2004: The year of desktop Linux?
-
Does the Gartner Vice President get handouts from... Andrew Cannon -
Hype May Have Faded? What?
As a systems company e... Nicholas Donovan
-
Linux was on my desktop since 1994 Anonymous
-
As an ordinary user who loves to experiment with t... Anonymous
-
Hmmm, FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, and FUD.
The initial exc... Dick Busch
-
Most Linux advocates seem to see the boogeyman beh... Anonymous
-
When Unix replaced Mainframes, didn't everything h... Tom Russell
Back to: 2004: The year of desktop Linux?
