Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Story: Gates takes a side-swipe at Apple, Linux security

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Clue Giver (Tuesday 27 January 2004, 8:57 PM)

  • Reply

Gates understands the situation very well. How else could he ALWAYS be saying the exact opposite to truth?

If Gates says Linux and Mac OSX are vulnerable, then they both can relax in the certain knowledge that they are essentially, invulnerable. Microsoft is no doubt doing everything they can to develop viruses for both these operating systems and if they or their partners had had any success doing so the viruses would be out there. Duplicitous behavior is, after all vintage Microsoft, in fact it's ALL they know. To the best of my knowledge OSX has NEVER had a virus and has been around for years. Linux smaller market share hasn't been so invulnerable but their virus count is tiny compared to the 1970's era sieve that Microsoft calls Windows.

In Gates defense, he is in a very difficult position. Microsoft has an operating system that is absolutely obsolete and if they change it to something modern, useable and secure they will be just like all the other UNIX based operating systems and be unable to use their proprietary software monopoly to extort huge piles of cash from users. They also would have NO unique (proprietary) application base and therefor would be bankrupt in a matter of months. They simply have, NO LEGITIMATE options to maintain their monopoly. Even Microsoft knows their loosing customers so to address this, they will make another lame proprietary attempt to close some holes with Longhorn at the users expense of course by increasing Microsoft's virtual access to everything on your computer. Nothing will be allowed to run without their blessing. Experts feel Longhorn may be USABLE by 2010 if it stays on schedule. Are we prepared for five more years in this hell we live in? Longhorn will of course set up yet another round of forced upgrades to all applications and the money taps are once again wide open and flowing mountains of cash. History repeats and we all swallow the Microsoft LIE whole, one more time. If they were capable of anything superior to absolute crapware we would have seen it LONG ago. Look at Apple they made the operating system transition flawlessly by all accounts, in just a few years, this simply is outside Microsoft's capability. In order to keep all current customers all software transitions must take decades or they risk loosing a customer to something that already works, not some fictional future date when all will, miraculously be wonderful and work too, this time, really.

Currently Windows has nearly a virtual lock on viruses that cost us each the purchase cost of our computer each year and thats just down time. Add to that the virtual certainty that we will each loose all our data each year on average and have to reinstall everything once twice or more each year. One begins to question the sanity of using anything Microsoft. NO other operating system endures this sort of perpetual rape of the customer base, so why do we continually put up with it? Is the certainty of being screwed by Microsoft better than, the uncertainty of changing to something that actually works, is secure and respects people's privacy? It seems insane doesn't it? Microsoft spends BILLIONS of our extorted money each year on FUD to keep us in mortal fear of this change. Microsoft's life literally depends on our stupidity, vulnerability and fear! Fortunately for humanity the shift from blind stupidity has started, so wake up a brother or two if you've come to your senses and if not, open your mind and realize that the years of FUD are simply lies to keep us captive SLAVES to Microsoft!

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: Gates takes a side-swipe at Apple, Linux security

  1. considering the fact that microsoft is the weak li... Adebayo Omo-Dare
  2. Ha mythos over logos Billy Gates. MS Windows is a... Captain Korn
  3. BS Bill! Mac OS X is inherently more secure than... Anonymous
  4. You are right about your comment and there is... Anonymous
  5. Once again, the naiveté of Bill Gates just astound... tom burkowski
  6. Gates is right as usual. It's amazing how people'... Anonymous
  7. Jealous of Gates? Grow up, child. It takes a small... molymauk
  8. This is the greatest ball I ever listened to in my... Guido La Vespa
  9. What a moron. That's like saying a high number... Tom W.
  10. Microsoft applications and operating systems are d... Scott Marlowe
  11. First off, I am not a Mac guy or Linux user. I am... Anonymous
  12. I am guessing that Bill Gates uses the same Crack... Anonymous
  13. Why not have a "Cracker Showdown"? Let's challenge... Anonymous
  14. I think the FBI (USA Internal investigations for t... Pecos Bill
  15. This statement by Bill is a bit like someone on a... Anonymous
  16. Gates is using the sensible defensive strategy: go... Jose L. Hales-Garcia
  17. Gates understands the situation very well. How els... Clue Giver
  18. Security through obscurity - that old saw has been... Mac the User
  19. Windows is fundamentally flawed code and Gates kno... John Davis
  20. An apt analogy might be the quarterback, who, afte... Anonymous
  21. There is, indeed, a world beyond Gates and Windows... Anonymous
  22. Bill Gates? Who is this idiot? Anonymous
  23. I've used a Mac now for 15 years and never once du... Malcolm Roberts
  24. Bring 'em on! Hackers make us stronger...and the w... Anonymous
  25. Noting the large number of major virus epidemics d... Joe
  26. First Off, Lets agree that no operating system now... Anonymous
  27. Dear Mr. Gates: Hackers are good for nothing. Pur... Bill Gordon
  28. There are happy Windows users in this world. I can... Wayne Johnson
  29. First off, let's agree that MY SYSTEM is SAFE from... Mac OS X user
  30. You posted this article too early. April Fool's da... Anonymous
  31. People who see hackers as a scourge miss the point... National Security
  32. Maybe Bill should have a chat with his senior vice... Jonathan
  33. Let's apply this logic elsewhere, shall we? "A Cit... Anonymous
  34. This is closer to it: Baghdad is manifestly safer... Anonymous
  35. After my initial reaction of "What the heck is tha... Tom Caswelch
  36. "Just because no one attacks it it does not make i... Anonymous
  37. Gates is desperate here. The several charges brou... Shane Walker
  38. Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire.... Anonymous
  39. What an arrogant SOB. It is his companys lack of p... Anonymous
  40. Either eat your cake or keep it Bill, but you can'... Rodd Clarkson
  41. My opinion about M$: "One can fool some people on... Tim Isher
  42. I have no idea whose OS is more secure. I only kno... Darrell Gudmundson
  43. I don't think that most of you are looking at the... Daniel Belanger
  44. What is this greatest media ever to hit the planet... Bascule
  45. Lets see Apple humm yes alot of hackers want to sc... Thomas Belajonas
  46. $250 an hour eh? well sign me up son. I just hope... C P Will
  47. $250=cost, not salary. He's saying they COST a lo... Anonymous
  48. bi'chin like little girls and everyone missin... Anonymous

Back to: Gates takes a side-swipe at Apple, Linux security

Sentry Posts Blog

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments

Symantec website breached

Security company Symantec has said that one of its websites was successfully breached. Romanian security researcher 'Unu' posted details of the breach in a blog post on Monday. Unu... More

Post a comment

Campaigners criticise '£10bn NHS IT ov...

The National Health Service's flagship IT project has been criticised by a tax campaign group for running billions of pounds over budget. The NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT)... More

2 comments


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters