Toolkit
Story: Linux servers 'attacked more often'
Posted by: Anonymous (Friday 20 February 2004, 8:24 PM)
a) All the windows servers are already compromised, therefore no need to attack (Seriously)
b) 13654 servers successfully attacked, where would they get a number like that: extrapolation or heuristics? You can't log that many cases.
c) Author states it does not include worms. Duh.
This article appears to be a cross between anecdotal and toung-in-cheek.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Linux servers 'attacked more often'
-
Welcome to the real world Linux! I hope you decide... Dave Oliver -
Not suprising is you consider Linux is used by the... Mark Cope
-
mi2g is a dodgy company with dodgy staff in need o... Anonymous
-
The MI2G study of servers "did not include other m... David Mohring
-
Continued...
ATTACKERS EXECUTING COMMANDS FROM THO... David Mohring
-
a) All the windows servers are already compromised... Anonymous -
Most likely open mail relays were considered "comp... Anonymous
-
Yes... From my experience, GNU/Linux systems are m... Matthew C. Tedder
-
I had to laugh at this comment: "With Windows serv... Joel Stone
-
Mi2g is a very dodgy company. I'm not sure you wan... Anonymous
-
did they control for the number of servers? and h... mark hahn
-
This is just the begining of the mess.
For years o... Spark
-
That doesn't mean that Linux servers are bad. The... Anonymous
-
Well. I agree that they counted more Linux servers... Sam
Back to: Linux servers 'attacked more often'
