Toolkit
Story: Linux servers 'attacked more often'
Posted by: Sam (Monday 23 February 2004, 3:59 PM)
Well. I agree that they counted more Linux servers! They didn't count my Linux server, who is quiet important, was attacked several times but they didn't managed it :> I agree with the man who wrote that if you are good config-file-writter noone can break in :) Not even you yourself :P Could anyone tell me the why how to count hacker attacks? Noone can count hacker attacks =) There is no way doing it :P
Full Talkback thread
Story: Linux servers 'attacked more often'
-
Welcome to the real world Linux! I hope you decide... Dave Oliver -
Not suprising is you consider Linux is used by the... Mark Cope
-
mi2g is a dodgy company with dodgy staff in need o... Anonymous
-
The MI2G study of servers "did not include other m... David Mohring
-
Continued...
ATTACKERS EXECUTING COMMANDS FROM THO... David Mohring
-
a) All the windows servers are already compromised... Anonymous
-
Most likely open mail relays were considered "comp... Anonymous
-
Yes... From my experience, GNU/Linux systems are m... Matthew C. Tedder
-
I had to laugh at this comment: "With Windows serv... Joel Stone
-
Mi2g is a very dodgy company. I'm not sure you wan... Anonymous
-
did they control for the number of servers? and h... mark hahn
-
This is just the begining of the mess.
For years o... Spark
-
That doesn't mean that Linux servers are bad. The... Anonymous
-
Well. I agree that they counted more Linux servers... Sam
Back to: Linux servers 'attacked more often'
