Toolkit
Story: XP uptake 'too slow' - Microsoft
Posted by: Anonymous (Thursday 15 April 2004, 7:46 PM)
My company has spent a lot of time and money following the MS WindoZe bouncing ball. I've used 3, 95, 98, 98SE, ME, And now have 2000. Up til 2000, it seemed that when enough bugs were fixed, out came a new release. Remember when ME was touted as the pinnacle of the series, and promptly hit the scrap heap?
Why bother with XP, anxiously awaiting SP2 when 2000 is stable and is up to SP4. Why go to XP when its replacement (Longhorn) is in the works for a 200? delivery. Why go to XP when it has so much bloat by trying to encompass all major features that others have developed for WindoZe. "innovation!!)
Full Talkback thread
Story: XP uptake 'too slow' - Microsoft
-
to whom it may concern
I have... Anonymous -
My company has spent a lot of time and money follo... Anonymous
Back to: XP uptake 'too slow' - Microsoft
