Story: Who Shot Darl McBride?
Posted by: Robert Halloran (Thursday 22 April 2004, 6:53 PM)
Excellent points, though Groklaw has pretty well shot most of SCO's IP claims down in flames. The likelihood of SCO ever collecting another cent of IP licensing is minute. The best they can hope for at this point is keeping the body alive long enough to unload their stock on the unsuspecting.
Oh, and a not-so-minor nitpick: Groklaw's Jones is Pamela, not Paula; Paula was one of Clinton's Conquests, remember?
Full Talkback thread
Story: Who Shot Darl McBride?
-
Excellent article! I enjoyed the read even though... Anonymous -
Excellent points, though Groklaw has pretty well s... Robert Halloran -
SCO can't drop the products side of their business... Dominc Jackson
-
Great article!
BayStar now looking for a scapgoa... Anonymous
-
Excellent.
I loved the article Anonymous
-
Very well written! A jewel of a summary for past a... Pierre van der Riet
-
there is a lot of both ,god and common sense in th... Anonymous
-
Excellent. I loved it. (S)ublime (C)orporate (O)ratory
-
Excellent Article - Microsoft was the puppeteer!! Anonymous
-
Good article, but there's one more hypothesis you... Jack Carroll
-
Don't get our hopes up with titles like that! ;^) Anonymous
-
Once all the dust settles and the smoke is cleared... Anonymous
-
You're a fluff idiot (lousy journalist). No one wa... Anonymous
-
Great insight, colorfully written. Thanks for the... John Koenig
-
To anonymous who complained that "no one was shot"... Anonymous
Back to: Who Shot Darl McBride?
