Story: Who Shot Darl McBride?
Posted by: Dominc Jackson (Thursday 22 April 2004, 7:20 PM)
SCO can't drop the products side of their business because the strongest of their (very weak) claims for $5 billion from IBM relate to the damage done (and continuing to be done) to their business by IBM's actions. That's why they have to keep the facade up of being a software company and developing real products.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Who Shot Darl McBride?
-
Excellent article! I enjoyed the read even though... Anonymous -
Excellent points, though Groklaw has pretty well s... Robert Halloran
-
SCO can't drop the products side of their business... Dominc Jackson -
Great article!
BayStar now looking for a scapgoa... Anonymous
-
Excellent.
I loved the article Anonymous
-
Very well written! A jewel of a summary for past a... Pierre van der Riet
-
there is a lot of both ,god and common sense in th... Anonymous
-
Excellent. I loved it. (S)ublime (C)orporate (O)ratory
-
Excellent Article - Microsoft was the puppeteer!! Anonymous
-
Good article, but there's one more hypothesis you... Jack Carroll
-
Don't get our hopes up with titles like that! ;^) Anonymous
-
Once all the dust settles and the smoke is cleared... Anonymous
-
You're a fluff idiot (lousy journalist). No one wa... Anonymous
-
Great insight, colorfully written. Thanks for the... John Koenig
-
To anonymous who complained that "no one was shot"... Anonymous
Back to: Who Shot Darl McBride?
