Emerging tech Toolkit
Story:
Posted by: Jonathan Kasso (Friday 21 May 2004, 1:57 AM)
To the author,
Are you assuming it is Kodak's fluorescent OLED they are licensing or did you get that information from the company? This is AMOLED and Samsung only has a license for PMOLED from Kodak. Additionally Samsung SDI has been in a JDA with Universal Display Corp. to develop AMOLED for several years. I would have thought this display incorporated UDC's PHOLEDs perhaps in addition to a blue fluorescent from another source, and not necessarilty Kodak. This is a question really and not necessarily an argument. Thanks!
Full Talkback thread
-
Not quite the largest:
Seiko Epson unveils first 4... Anonymous -
Epson's OLED isn't due until 2007, Samsung's OLED... Anonymous
-
the title of this article is incorrect. Seiko has... Anonymous
-
The Epson display is physically larger, but it's r... Rupert Goodwins
-
To the author,
Are you assuming it is Kodak's fl... Jonathan Kasso -
Picture of the Epson unit on their press release h... Anonymous
-
Thanks for the link to Epson, but if you read the... Curt Rostenbach
-
The main point of interest to me is the Epson use... Anonymous
-
Until:
1) They have at least 1920 x 1080 resolutio... Anonymous
-
Looks like Samsung are well on the way
http:/... Anonymous -
OLED is not just used as display. Also, it can be... Anonymous
-
So this means that Universal Display is in the dri... Anonymous
-
The cost at which the Samsung Corporation is going... Rahul
-
We would like to buy a large sceen of 500x300 mm Har-melech Moshe
-
Is this product available yet? Anonymous
-
OLED Technology is the Display for the future!
sma... erich STrasser
-
www.oled-display.net
For the people who wants more... Anonymous
