Emerging tech Toolkit
Story:
Posted by: Curt Rostenbach (Friday 21 May 2004, 8:37 PM)
Thanks for the link to Epson, but if you read the specs, it is larger (40"), but has lower resolution (1280x768) compared to 17" and 1600x1280. Both are remarkable, too bad prices are not compared
Full Talkback thread
-
Not quite the largest:
Seiko Epson unveils first 4... Anonymous -
Epson's OLED isn't due until 2007, Samsung's OLED... Anonymous
-
the title of this article is incorrect. Seiko has... Anonymous
-
The Epson display is physically larger, but it's r... Rupert Goodwins
-
To the author,
Are you assuming it is Kodak's fl... Jonathan Kasso
-
Picture of the Epson unit on their press release h... Anonymous
-
Thanks for the link to Epson, but if you read the... Curt Rostenbach -
The main point of interest to me is the Epson use... Anonymous
-
Until:
1) They have at least 1920 x 1080 resolutio... Anonymous
-
Looks like Samsung are well on the way
http:/... Anonymous -
OLED is not just used as display. Also, it can be... Anonymous
-
So this means that Universal Display is in the dri... Anonymous
-
The cost at which the Samsung Corporation is going... Rahul
-
We would like to buy a large sceen of 500x300 mm Har-melech Moshe
-
Is this product available yet? Anonymous
-
OLED Technology is the Display for the future!
sma... erich STrasser
-
www.oled-display.net
For the people who wants more... Anonymous
