Toolkit

Story: SCO fights back against 'don't pay' advice

Posted by: Andrew Cannon (Friday 28 May 2004, 10:41 AM)

Anyone who actually buys a SCO Linux "licence" should ask themselves why they are buying the "licence".

SCO have not proved they own the copyrights, despite requiring you to buy a "licence" allowing you use of "their" code.

SCO are saying that the source code was illegally in the public domain, despite the fact that SCO also had a LINUX version that was FREE TO DOWNLOAD.

SCO have dropped the initial claims against IBM, yet increased their compensation demands.

SCO contributed to LINUX under the GPL.

Read about it at http://www.grocklaw.net

Full Talkback thread