Advertisement
Promo

Desktop platforms Toolkit

In association with HP

Talkback

Post a comment


Story: Linux kernel: Moving closer to Windows?

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Jeff Davies (Thursday 1 July 2004, 11:49 PM)

  • Reply

Bad technical article. As the article quotes a guy, I don't know if it's the article, or the person quoted that's at fault here.

Kernel windowing? Do they mean framebuffer support in the kernel?
Who knows.
You can exchange large chunks of memory between programs using shared memory. This isn't new.
You can compile using -O2 optimisation to allow access to hardware (including IO stuff like screen ram mapped in physical RAM) using GNU C. Always could (I did that for 386s!).

The messaging structure of XWindows has absolutely nothing to do at all with the Unix kernel. Xwindows is an application that runs on top of various posix kernels. The core parts of XFree86 will be compiled with -O2 to enable access to hardware for hardware acceleration. This really has nothing at all to do with the linux kernel.

This article is just confused. It's like someone with no knowledge listened to a technical conversation and completely misinterpreted it.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: Linux kernel: Moving closer to Windows?

  1. One good thing about this artcle is that it reveil... Lindsey Rockwell
  2. Haha. It is amazing that the people who write thes... Andy Potter
  3. Microsoft owns ZDNet That's the only reasonable ex... Marc Martin
  4. "Windows, said Russinovich, owes a great deal to a... Matthew Foerman
  5. The article says, and I quote: Meanwhile Linux, n... Christos Dimitrakakis
  6. -sigh- another one bites the bling... It's a shame... Lance Kalzus
  7. In some features sure... Why not? In many others... Anonymous
  8. "one of the creators of Digital's VMS Unix operati... Anonymous
  9. Bad technical article. As the article quotes a guy... Jeff Davies
  10. "Windows, said Russinovich, owes a great deal to a... Russell Conner
  11. I tend to agree with the idea that windows is movi... Anonymous
  12. Heck - Linux closer to windows? Wait, now windows... pepe
  13. He has absolutely no clue what he's talking about:... Michael
  14. If the linux operating system is approaching windo... Ben Dischinger
  15. More FUD and lousy editing. I remember why I stopp... JMc
  16. I'm like... lost of words by the sheer bullshit wr... Anonymous
  17. This guy really know nothing... He is comparing th... Carlos Perilla
  18. Well except the fact that one of the kernels has a... ray klassen
  19. what kind of article is this? it's totally mixing... Mike Johnson
  20. If we accept this as true (and it is not), the mai... No more salves
  21. Maybe this article reveals that M$ is making is ug... Swann Tereo
  22. More FUD. Microsoft products are nothing even clos... Stephen Kuhn
  23. How can you have an opinion... without seeing the... Alan Peery
  24. When journalism becomes little more then a means o... Jon Spanos
  25. Hahaha ZDnet at it again. This _IS_ the most reta... Anonymous
  26. The author is certainly moving closer to BULL SHIT... Aj
  27. I'll put my hands up to the VMS Unix slip-up. We s... Matt Loney
  28. point taken!. I think it is better to publish thes... Hassan moallin
  29. A lot of you guys/gals fail to note that this arti... Robin Strahan
  30. Hmmm.... doing a graphical operation on Windows in... Tim Wright
  31. The Linux kernel is far superior to the NT kernel.... Nicholas Donovan
  32. Dave Cutler was a VMS contributor in the early day... Anonymous
  33. RE: Russinovich tech ability Mark Russinovich is t... Anonymous
  34. ASUS just told today INTEL take your chips... Ajit Arora
  35. This doesn't make any sense. Even though Russinov... Ryan Thoryk
  36. All these comments are nothing more than over... Your Momma
  37. Kernel Windowing... The creator of the Minix OS (A... Ryan Thoryk
  38. Some notes to those who write about how unsta... Adam Sandor
  39. Windows NT 3.0 was monolithic instead of mic... X Microsofty
  40. I'm disappointed . . . that a website with a long... Craig Crabtree
  41. I only access ZDNet to have a laugh or two when an... Anonymous
  42. windoze have SMP kernel? tygr
  43. Well folks! Don't forget that this is from ZDnet,... Anonymous
  44. Dont forget who Russinovitch is. He is a major win... ximmoto
  45. My previous comment left too much unsaid: Linux an... Max Lybbert
  46. I'll never understand why X keeps getting dragged... Lance Boyle
  47. Are any of the kiddies whacking this article over... Vance Shearer
  48. Windows' bad ideas: 1. The GUI can't be stopp... Win Doe
  49. To the last thing in the prevoius commen... Adam Sándor
  50. This must be part of the "Get the facts campaign"... German Krackow

Back to: Linux kernel: Moving closer to Windows?

More In Desktop platforms


Video icon

Video

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

ALL TOOLKITS

Blogs

Newsletters