Toolkit
Story: SCO: IBM has 'failed to comply'
So SCO are saying IBM haven't fully responded to a lawsuit that SCO itself haven't fully declared.
Isn't that a bit like expecting someone to be able to awnser a question that hasn't even been asked yet?
Surely the US courts can see by now that the whole case is simply a Microsoft sponsored (seeing as their the main financial contributors) attempt to undermine business confidence in Linux.
SCO and Microsoft know they can't win but have figured its cheaper to keep paying the lawyers and keep ripping of companies which would otherwise switch to a cheaper Linux solution.
Full Talkback thread
Story: SCO: IBM has 'failed to comply'
-
Ho hum, another SCO inspired delay. Every time we... Andrew Cannon -
Does anyone still listen to these guys?
Seems to m... Steve -
So SCO are saying IBM haven't fully responded to a... Anonymous -
Hang on here, so SCO are demanding all the pa... Anonymous -
of course this article doesn't mention that SCO ha... cookie -
It's silly of you to print SCO press releases, and... Anonymous -
I have to agree. ZD .... Not one line of the "mill... Rick -
TSG/SCO has provided discovery.
Unfortunately... Dwiget
Back to: SCO: IBM has 'failed to comply'



